Scope of the arbitrage pricing theory

M. Lekovič
{"title":"Scope of the arbitrage pricing theory","authors":"M. Lekovič","doi":"10.5937/aneksub1942129l","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An important element of the positive portfolio theory which in addition to the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) provides an important contribution in terms of understanding the relationship between return and risk and pricing of assets in the capital market is the Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT). This theory has been in focus of the economists for decades and is gaining advantage over the CAPM model in theory; however, not in practical terms. The paper aims to search for an answer to the question whether, after the four decades since the APT model has been introduced, there is a consensus in the financial literature on the validity and feasibility of this model in practice. The method of qualitative economic analysis, which allows us to draw valid conclusions on the researched issue based on studying the relevant literature, was applied in this paper. The general conclusion of the research is that the consensus on the key factors of the systematic risk has not yet been reached among economic theorists, researchers and practitioners, which would have eliminated the main deficiency of the APT model, ensured its validity and improved the applicability in practice. The lack of consensus on the most important systematic risk factors has been identified, thus indicating the limited scope of the APT model, which at the same time represents the main result of the research.","PeriodicalId":33873,"journal":{"name":"Anali Ekonomskog fakulteta u Subotici","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anali Ekonomskog fakulteta u Subotici","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/aneksub1942129l","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An important element of the positive portfolio theory which in addition to the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) provides an important contribution in terms of understanding the relationship between return and risk and pricing of assets in the capital market is the Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT). This theory has been in focus of the economists for decades and is gaining advantage over the CAPM model in theory; however, not in practical terms. The paper aims to search for an answer to the question whether, after the four decades since the APT model has been introduced, there is a consensus in the financial literature on the validity and feasibility of this model in practice. The method of qualitative economic analysis, which allows us to draw valid conclusions on the researched issue based on studying the relevant literature, was applied in this paper. The general conclusion of the research is that the consensus on the key factors of the systematic risk has not yet been reached among economic theorists, researchers and practitioners, which would have eliminated the main deficiency of the APT model, ensured its validity and improved the applicability in practice. The lack of consensus on the most important systematic risk factors has been identified, thus indicating the limited scope of the APT model, which at the same time represents the main result of the research.
套利定价理论的适用范围
除了资本资产定价模型(CAPM)之外,正投资组合理论的一个重要组成部分是套利定价理论(APT),它在理解资本市场中资产的回报与风险和定价之间的关系方面做出了重要贡献。几十年来,这一理论一直受到经济学家的关注,并在理论上逐渐超越CAPM模型;然而,在实践中并非如此。本文旨在寻找一个问题的答案,即在APT模型引入四十年后,金融文献是否对该模型在实践中的有效性和可行性达成共识。本文采用定性经济分析的方法,在研究相关文献的基础上对所研究的问题得出有效的结论。研究的总体结论是,经济理论家、研究者和实践者对系统性风险的关键因素尚未达成共识,这将消除APT模型的主要缺陷,保证其有效性,提高其在实践中的适用性。对最重要的系统性风险因素缺乏共识,这表明APT模型的范围有限,同时也代表了研究的主要成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信