G. Cvijanović, N. Čolic, Nenad Đurić, G. Dozet, Abduladim Eltreki, Marija Cvijanović, M. Žuža
{"title":"Effect of biostimulants on soybean seedlings","authors":"G. Cvijanović, N. Čolic, Nenad Đurić, G. Dozet, Abduladim Eltreki, Marija Cvijanović, M. Žuža","doi":"10.5937/AASER2050099C","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"www.afc.kg.ac.rs Effect of biostimulants on soybean seedlings Gorica Cvijanović1, Ninoslav Čolić2, Nenad Đurić2, Gordana Dozet2, Abduladim Eltreki2, Marija Cvijanović3, Milena Žuža2 1University of Kragujevac, Institute for Information Technologies Jovana Cvijića bb, Kragujevac, Serbia 2Megatrend University, Faculty of Biofarming Maršala Tita 39, 24300 Bačka Topola, Serbia 3University of Bijeljina, Faculty of Agriculture Pavlovića put bb, 76300 Bijeljina, BiH *Corresponding author: cvijagor@yahoo.com Received 8 April 2020; Accepted 9 September 2020 A B S T R A C T The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of biostimulants on the morphological characteristics of soybean seedlings. The testing was conducted in the laboratory of the Faculty of Biofarming in Bačka Topola. The experimental material included three soybean varieties (‘Galina’, ‘Sava’ and ‘Rubin’) selected at the Institute of Field and Vegetable Crops in Novi Sad. The study lasted for two years, 2015–2016, and identical biostimulant treatments were applied in both years. In order to determine the effect of biostimulants on soybean seedling root, hypocotyl and weight, the following commercial biostimulants were applied: EM Aktiv, Terra Green Hobby, Slavol and Bioplant Flora. In addition to the single application of biostimulants, two combinations of Slavol + Bioplant Flora and Slavol + Bioplant Flora + Epin Extra + Slavol S were used as treatments. EM Aktiv showed the greatest effect on root growth. The root was on average 12% longer than the control. Slavol S had the greatest influence on seedling hypocotyl and weight. The increase was 8.24% and 5.15%, respectively, compared with the control.","PeriodicalId":31632,"journal":{"name":"Acta Agriculturae Serbica","volume":"25 1","pages":"99-104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Agriculturae Serbica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/AASER2050099C","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
www.afc.kg.ac.rs Effect of biostimulants on soybean seedlings Gorica Cvijanović1, Ninoslav Čolić2, Nenad Đurić2, Gordana Dozet2, Abduladim Eltreki2, Marija Cvijanović3, Milena Žuža2 1University of Kragujevac, Institute for Information Technologies Jovana Cvijića bb, Kragujevac, Serbia 2Megatrend University, Faculty of Biofarming Maršala Tita 39, 24300 Bačka Topola, Serbia 3University of Bijeljina, Faculty of Agriculture Pavlovića put bb, 76300 Bijeljina, BiH *Corresponding author: cvijagor@yahoo.com Received 8 April 2020; Accepted 9 September 2020 A B S T R A C T The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of biostimulants on the morphological characteristics of soybean seedlings. The testing was conducted in the laboratory of the Faculty of Biofarming in Bačka Topola. The experimental material included three soybean varieties (‘Galina’, ‘Sava’ and ‘Rubin’) selected at the Institute of Field and Vegetable Crops in Novi Sad. The study lasted for two years, 2015–2016, and identical biostimulant treatments were applied in both years. In order to determine the effect of biostimulants on soybean seedling root, hypocotyl and weight, the following commercial biostimulants were applied: EM Aktiv, Terra Green Hobby, Slavol and Bioplant Flora. In addition to the single application of biostimulants, two combinations of Slavol + Bioplant Flora and Slavol + Bioplant Flora + Epin Extra + Slavol S were used as treatments. EM Aktiv showed the greatest effect on root growth. The root was on average 12% longer than the control. Slavol S had the greatest influence on seedling hypocotyl and weight. The increase was 8.24% and 5.15%, respectively, compared with the control.
www.afc.kg.ac.rs生物刺激素对大豆幼苗的影响Gorica Cvijanović1,NinoslavČ奥利ć2,NenadĐurić2,Gordana Dozet2, Abduladim Eltreki2, Marija Cvijanović3米Žuža2 1 Kragujevac大学信息技术研究所Jovana Cvijićbb, Kragujevac,塞尔维亚两大趋势大学学院生物农业Marš泰坦阿拉巴马州39 24300 Bačka Topola,塞尔维亚3叫Bijeljina大学农业学院Pavlović把bb, 76300叫Bijeljina,波黑*通讯作者:cvijagor@yahoo.com 2020年4月8日收稿;A B S T R A C T本研究的目的是分析生物刺激素对大豆幼苗形态特征的影响。测试是在ba ka Topola生物农业学院的实验室进行的。实验材料包括三个大豆品种(“Galina”、“Sava”和“Rubin”),这些品种是由诺维萨德的大田和蔬菜作物研究所选择的。该研究持续了两年,2015-2016年,两年内都使用了相同的生物刺激素治疗。为了确定生物刺激素对大豆幼苗根系、下胚轴和体重的影响,应用了EM Aktiv、Terra Green Hobby、Slavol和Bioplant Flora等商品生物刺激素。除单一施用生物刺激剂外,还采用Slavol + Bioplant Flora和Slavol + Bioplant Flora + Epin Extra + Slavol S两种组合处理。EM Aktiv对根系生长的影响最大。根平均比对照长12%。Slavol S对幼苗下胚轴和重的影响最大。与对照组相比分别增加8.24%和5.15%。