Racial Differences in Patients with Coronary Vasomotion Disorders

S. Sueda, Tomoki Sakaue
{"title":"Racial Differences in Patients with Coronary Vasomotion Disorders","authors":"S. Sueda, Tomoki Sakaue","doi":"10.7793/JCAD.27.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Japanese physicians have made major contributions in this fi eld of coronary epicardial spasm 13, 14) . Compared with Caucasian variant angina, Japanese variant angina affect fewer female patients and exhibits less organic stenosis, less poor left ventricular function, less prior myocardial infarction, and good prognosis as shown in Table 1 13 - 18) . Under the optimal medications, Japanese variant angina had favorable clinical outcomes, whereas Caucasian variant angina did not have a benign prognosis in the clinic. The incidence of death without organic stenosis in Japanese variant angina is higher than that in Caucasian variant angina. We rarely experi-Review Racial differences regarding coronary vasomotion disorders between Caucasian and Japanese populations are controversial. In the past, coronary epicardial spasm was more often recognized in Japanese people than in Caucasian populations. In contrast, coronary microvascular dysfunction is typically observed in Caucasian patients. Japanese cardiologists perform spasm provocation testing actively in patients with unobstructive coronary artery disease, whereas Caucasian cardiologists except for those in some special institutions may skip coronary reactivity testing in the cardiac catheterization laboratory if they encounter patients with unobstructive coronary artery disease. In this review, we present the racial and ethnic disparities in the incidence and clinical characteristics between Caucasian and Japanese populations with coronary vasomotion disorders.","PeriodicalId":73692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of coronary artery disease","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of coronary artery disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7793/JCAD.27.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Japanese physicians have made major contributions in this fi eld of coronary epicardial spasm 13, 14) . Compared with Caucasian variant angina, Japanese variant angina affect fewer female patients and exhibits less organic stenosis, less poor left ventricular function, less prior myocardial infarction, and good prognosis as shown in Table 1 13 - 18) . Under the optimal medications, Japanese variant angina had favorable clinical outcomes, whereas Caucasian variant angina did not have a benign prognosis in the clinic. The incidence of death without organic stenosis in Japanese variant angina is higher than that in Caucasian variant angina. We rarely experi-Review Racial differences regarding coronary vasomotion disorders between Caucasian and Japanese populations are controversial. In the past, coronary epicardial spasm was more often recognized in Japanese people than in Caucasian populations. In contrast, coronary microvascular dysfunction is typically observed in Caucasian patients. Japanese cardiologists perform spasm provocation testing actively in patients with unobstructive coronary artery disease, whereas Caucasian cardiologists except for those in some special institutions may skip coronary reactivity testing in the cardiac catheterization laboratory if they encounter patients with unobstructive coronary artery disease. In this review, we present the racial and ethnic disparities in the incidence and clinical characteristics between Caucasian and Japanese populations with coronary vasomotion disorders.
冠状动脉血管舒张障碍患者的种族差异
日本医生在冠状动脉心外膜痉挛这一领域做出了重大贡献(13,14)。与高加索变异性心绞痛相比,日本变异性心绞痛女性患者较少,器质性狭窄较少,左心室功能较差,既往心肌梗死较少,预后较好(见表1 13 - 18)。在最佳药物治疗下,日本变异型心绞痛临床预后良好,而高加索变异型心绞痛临床预后不佳。日本变异型心绞痛无器质性狭窄的死亡率高于高加索变异型心绞痛。白种人和日本人在冠状动脉血管舒张障碍方面的种族差异是有争议的。在过去,冠状动脉心外膜痉挛在日本人中比在白种人中更常见。相反,冠状动脉微血管功能障碍在白种人患者中较为典型。日本心脏病专家在遇到非梗阻性冠状动脉疾病患者时会积极进行痉挛激发试验,而高加索心脏病专家除了一些特殊机构的专家外,在遇到非梗阻性冠状动脉疾病患者时可能会跳过心导管实验室的冠状动脉反应性试验。在这篇综述中,我们介绍了高加索人和日本人冠状动脉血管舒张症发病率和临床特征的种族和民族差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信