Impella®, Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Device for Cardiogenic Shock

M. Iida, T. Shimokawa
{"title":"Impella®, Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Device for Cardiogenic Shock","authors":"M. Iida, T. Shimokawa","doi":"10.7793/JCAD.27.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"5.0 with maximum fl ow of 6 L/min), and Impella RP (Right Percutaneous - designed to support the right ventri-cle). Impella 5.5 is expected to be available in Japan soon. Historically, intra-aortic balloon pumping (IABP) and percutaneous cardiopulmonary support (PCPS) have been widely used for patients with refractory CS. However, multiple clinical studies show that IABP alone may not improve prognosis of refractory CS 10, 11) . Some of those refractory CS patients may benefi t from PCPS in terms of survival 12) but robust data to validate the strategy is still lacking. The Impella device is hence expected to improve outcomes of patients with drug-resistant acute heart failure including cardiogenic shock as a new therapy option 13) . In Japan, the fi rst implant was done in October 2017 at Osaka University, and since then 1,326 patients have been implanted and enrolled in the Japanese Registry for Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices (J-PVAD registry), an investigator-led, pro-Review We report the outcome of patients supported with the Impella device at our institution. Similar to the interim analysis of J-PVAD registry presented at the 84th Annual Scientific Meeting of the Japanese Circulation Society, we observed a worse outcome in patients with AMI cardiogenic shock who received late Impella support. It is also important to highlight that only one patient of this cohort received Impella support before reperfusion at our institute. A door to unloading strategy as opposed to one emphasizing door to balloon combined with earlier initiation of Impella support seems promising 1) and it the creation of a system that embraces door to unloading which is both our institute’s challenge and opportunity to improve outcomes.","PeriodicalId":73692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of coronary artery disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of coronary artery disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7793/JCAD.27.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

5.0 with maximum fl ow of 6 L/min), and Impella RP (Right Percutaneous - designed to support the right ventri-cle). Impella 5.5 is expected to be available in Japan soon. Historically, intra-aortic balloon pumping (IABP) and percutaneous cardiopulmonary support (PCPS) have been widely used for patients with refractory CS. However, multiple clinical studies show that IABP alone may not improve prognosis of refractory CS 10, 11) . Some of those refractory CS patients may benefi t from PCPS in terms of survival 12) but robust data to validate the strategy is still lacking. The Impella device is hence expected to improve outcomes of patients with drug-resistant acute heart failure including cardiogenic shock as a new therapy option 13) . In Japan, the fi rst implant was done in October 2017 at Osaka University, and since then 1,326 patients have been implanted and enrolled in the Japanese Registry for Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices (J-PVAD registry), an investigator-led, pro-Review We report the outcome of patients supported with the Impella device at our institution. Similar to the interim analysis of J-PVAD registry presented at the 84th Annual Scientific Meeting of the Japanese Circulation Society, we observed a worse outcome in patients with AMI cardiogenic shock who received late Impella support. It is also important to highlight that only one patient of this cohort received Impella support before reperfusion at our institute. A door to unloading strategy as opposed to one emphasizing door to balloon combined with earlier initiation of Impella support seems promising 1) and it the creation of a system that embraces door to unloading which is both our institute’s challenge and opportunity to improve outcomes.
Impella®,经皮左心室辅助装置用于心源性休克
5.0,最大流量为6l /min), Impella RP(右经皮-设计用于支持右心室)。Impella 5.5预计将很快在日本上市。历史上,主动脉内球囊泵送(IABP)和经皮心肺支持(pps)已广泛应用于难治性CS患者。然而,多项临床研究表明,单独使用IABP可能无法改善难治性CS的预后(10,11)。一些难治性CS患者可能会从ppps中获益,但仍然缺乏可靠的数据来验证该策略。因此,Impella装置有望改善耐药急性心力衰竭患者的预后,包括心源性休克,作为一种新的治疗选择(13)。在日本,首次植入于2017年10月在大阪大学完成,从那时起,1,326名患者被植入并登记在日本经皮心室辅助装置登记处(J-PVAD登记处),这是一项由研究者领导的专业审查。我们报告了在我们机构支持Impella设备的患者的结果。与在日本循环学会第84届年度科学会议上发表的J-PVAD登记的中期分析类似,我们观察到AMI心源性休克患者接受晚期Impella支持的预后更差。同样重要的是,该队列中只有1例患者在我院再灌注前接受了Impella支持。门到卸载策略,而不是强调门到气球的策略,与早期发起的Impella支持相结合,似乎很有希望(1),它是一个包含门到卸载的系统的创建,这既是我们研究所的挑战,也是改善结果的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信