Dual visual impairment and contrast sensitivity among community-dwelling older adults: a cross-sectional study from the PrevQuedas Brazil trial

Fernanda Pretti Chalet Ferreira, Maria Aquimara Zambone Magalhães, R. Varanda, E. Y. Ishigaki, A. D. S. Passos, A. Sañudo, M. Perracini
{"title":"Dual visual impairment and contrast sensitivity among community-dwelling older adults: a cross-sectional study from the PrevQuedas Brazil trial","authors":"Fernanda Pretti Chalet Ferreira, Maria Aquimara Zambone Magalhães, R. Varanda, E. Y. Ishigaki, A. D. S. Passos, A. Sañudo, M. Perracini","doi":"10.53886/gga.e0230025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To investigate the importance of improving visual assessment for community-dwelling older adult fallers. Methods: This cross-sectional study included eligible community-dwelling older adults (> 60 years of age) from the PrevQuedas Brazil clinical trial who had suffered at least 1 fall in the last 12 months (n = 703). We evaluated visual acuity and contrast sensitivity using the Snellen E chart and low contrast visual acuity tests; those with both impairment types were considered to have dual visual impairment. Results: Visual acuity, low contrast sensitivity, and dual visual impairment were associated with recurrent falls (OR 1.85); visual impairment was more prevalent among the oldest old. Approximately 90.00% of the participants reported using glasses, and 63.80% used multifocal lenses. Dual impairment was identified in 143 (20.30%) participants. In multivariate logistic regression, the predictive variables for recurrent falls were low contrast sensitivity (95%CI 1.15–2.47), dual visual impairment (95%CI 1.16–2.83), and self-perceived fall risk (95%CI 1.16–2.46) which was measured using the Falls Efficacy Scale-International. Conclusion: Older adults with dual visual impairment are more likely to suffer recurrent falls. Low contrast sensitivity is crucial for fall risk assessment. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01698580).","PeriodicalId":52782,"journal":{"name":"Geriatrics Gerontology and Aging","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatrics Gerontology and Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53886/gga.e0230025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the importance of improving visual assessment for community-dwelling older adult fallers. Methods: This cross-sectional study included eligible community-dwelling older adults (> 60 years of age) from the PrevQuedas Brazil clinical trial who had suffered at least 1 fall in the last 12 months (n = 703). We evaluated visual acuity and contrast sensitivity using the Snellen E chart and low contrast visual acuity tests; those with both impairment types were considered to have dual visual impairment. Results: Visual acuity, low contrast sensitivity, and dual visual impairment were associated with recurrent falls (OR 1.85); visual impairment was more prevalent among the oldest old. Approximately 90.00% of the participants reported using glasses, and 63.80% used multifocal lenses. Dual impairment was identified in 143 (20.30%) participants. In multivariate logistic regression, the predictive variables for recurrent falls were low contrast sensitivity (95%CI 1.15–2.47), dual visual impairment (95%CI 1.16–2.83), and self-perceived fall risk (95%CI 1.16–2.46) which was measured using the Falls Efficacy Scale-International. Conclusion: Older adults with dual visual impairment are more likely to suffer recurrent falls. Low contrast sensitivity is crucial for fall risk assessment. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01698580).
社区居住老年人的双重视力障碍和对比敏感性:来自PrevQuedas巴西试验的横断面研究
目的:探讨改善社区老年跌倒患者视力评估的重要性。方法:本横断面研究纳入了来自PrevQuedas巴西临床试验的在过去12个月内至少发生过1次跌倒的符合条件的社区居住老年人(60岁至60岁)(n = 703)。我们使用Snellen E图和低对比度视力测试评估视力和对比灵敏度;同时患有这两种视力障碍的人被认为患有双重视力障碍。结果:视力、低对比敏感度和双重视力障碍与复发性跌倒相关(OR 1.85);视力障碍在老年人中更为普遍。大约90.00%的参与者报告使用眼镜,63.80%使用多焦镜片。143名(20.30%)参与者存在双重损伤。在多变量logistic回归中,反复跌倒的预测变量为低对比敏感度(95%CI 1.15-2.47)、双重视力障碍(95%CI 1.16-2.83)和自我感知跌倒风险(95%CI 1.16-2.46),使用国际跌倒疗效量表测量。结论:老年双重视力障碍患者更容易发生复发性跌倒。低对比敏感度对于评估跌倒风险至关重要。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01698580)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信