Fernanda Pretti Chalet Ferreira, Maria Aquimara Zambone Magalhães, R. Varanda, E. Y. Ishigaki, A. D. S. Passos, A. Sañudo, M. Perracini
{"title":"Dual visual impairment and contrast sensitivity among community-dwelling older adults: a cross-sectional study from the PrevQuedas Brazil trial","authors":"Fernanda Pretti Chalet Ferreira, Maria Aquimara Zambone Magalhães, R. Varanda, E. Y. Ishigaki, A. D. S. Passos, A. Sañudo, M. Perracini","doi":"10.53886/gga.e0230025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To investigate the importance of improving visual assessment for community-dwelling older adult fallers. Methods: This cross-sectional study included eligible community-dwelling older adults (> 60 years of age) from the PrevQuedas Brazil clinical trial who had suffered at least 1 fall in the last 12 months (n = 703). We evaluated visual acuity and contrast sensitivity using the Snellen E chart and low contrast visual acuity tests; those with both impairment types were considered to have dual visual impairment. Results: Visual acuity, low contrast sensitivity, and dual visual impairment were associated with recurrent falls (OR 1.85); visual impairment was more prevalent among the oldest old. Approximately 90.00% of the participants reported using glasses, and 63.80% used multifocal lenses. Dual impairment was identified in 143 (20.30%) participants. In multivariate logistic regression, the predictive variables for recurrent falls were low contrast sensitivity (95%CI 1.15–2.47), dual visual impairment (95%CI 1.16–2.83), and self-perceived fall risk (95%CI 1.16–2.46) which was measured using the Falls Efficacy Scale-International. Conclusion: Older adults with dual visual impairment are more likely to suffer recurrent falls. Low contrast sensitivity is crucial for fall risk assessment. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01698580).","PeriodicalId":52782,"journal":{"name":"Geriatrics Gerontology and Aging","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatrics Gerontology and Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53886/gga.e0230025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the importance of improving visual assessment for community-dwelling older adult fallers. Methods: This cross-sectional study included eligible community-dwelling older adults (> 60 years of age) from the PrevQuedas Brazil clinical trial who had suffered at least 1 fall in the last 12 months (n = 703). We evaluated visual acuity and contrast sensitivity using the Snellen E chart and low contrast visual acuity tests; those with both impairment types were considered to have dual visual impairment. Results: Visual acuity, low contrast sensitivity, and dual visual impairment were associated with recurrent falls (OR 1.85); visual impairment was more prevalent among the oldest old. Approximately 90.00% of the participants reported using glasses, and 63.80% used multifocal lenses. Dual impairment was identified in 143 (20.30%) participants. In multivariate logistic regression, the predictive variables for recurrent falls were low contrast sensitivity (95%CI 1.15–2.47), dual visual impairment (95%CI 1.16–2.83), and self-perceived fall risk (95%CI 1.16–2.46) which was measured using the Falls Efficacy Scale-International. Conclusion: Older adults with dual visual impairment are more likely to suffer recurrent falls. Low contrast sensitivity is crucial for fall risk assessment. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01698580).