Evaluating waterfront landscape aesthetics as a tourist attraction: Case study of the river Tisza, Hungary

Turizam Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.5937/turizam26-29744
Z. Karancsi, Sándor Hornyák, E. Szalma, Ferenc Oláh, Annamária Korom, Gergely Horváth, Ferenc Győri
{"title":"Evaluating waterfront landscape aesthetics as a tourist attraction: Case study of the river Tisza, Hungary","authors":"Z. Karancsi, Sándor Hornyák, E. Szalma, Ferenc Oláh, Annamária Korom, Gergely Horváth, Ferenc Győri","doi":"10.5937/turizam26-29744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper represents a methodological attempt to evaluate the natural and built riverside environment of the Tisza river, from the point of view of landscape-and environmental aesthetics and features, which might serve as background for river tourism. The research methodology was based on the theoretical division of the riverside into more or less homogeneous , easily observable sections (called visual units), and then they were evaluated one by one. Objectivity was one of the most important aims; researchers attempted to achieve it by applying the value-selection method. Following the evaluation of each sample section of the riverside area, all sections were then assigned to three different categories. Those sections which were capable of generating positive feelings were placed under the category 'Attractive', those which were capable of arousing less enthusiasm were assigned to the category of 'Neutral', and those which could be characterized by visually conflicting elements were categorized as 'Unattractive/Repulsive'. As a result of the findings of a tour of inspection and the compilation and survey of the photo documentation at the researchers' disposal, they were able to point out that the sample area was not characterized by visual conflicts of considerable significance, consequently , none of the chosen sample units fell into the category of 'Unattractive'.","PeriodicalId":34846,"journal":{"name":"Turizam","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turizam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/turizam26-29744","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper represents a methodological attempt to evaluate the natural and built riverside environment of the Tisza river, from the point of view of landscape-and environmental aesthetics and features, which might serve as background for river tourism. The research methodology was based on the theoretical division of the riverside into more or less homogeneous , easily observable sections (called visual units), and then they were evaluated one by one. Objectivity was one of the most important aims; researchers attempted to achieve it by applying the value-selection method. Following the evaluation of each sample section of the riverside area, all sections were then assigned to three different categories. Those sections which were capable of generating positive feelings were placed under the category 'Attractive', those which were capable of arousing less enthusiasm were assigned to the category of 'Neutral', and those which could be characterized by visually conflicting elements were categorized as 'Unattractive/Repulsive'. As a result of the findings of a tour of inspection and the compilation and survey of the photo documentation at the researchers' disposal, they were able to point out that the sample area was not characterized by visual conflicts of considerable significance, consequently , none of the chosen sample units fell into the category of 'Unattractive'.
评价作为旅游景点的滨水景观美学:以匈牙利Tisza河为例
本文从景观环境美学和特征的角度,对天萨河的自然环境和人工河滨环境进行了方法学上的评价,为开发河滨旅游提供了理论依据。研究方法是在理论上将河段划分为或多或少同质的、容易观察的区段(称为视觉单元),然后逐一进行评价。客观性是最重要的目标之一;研究者试图通过应用价值选择方法来实现它。在对河滨地区的每个样本区域进行评估后,将所有区域划分为三个不同的类别。那些能够产生积极感觉的部分被归为“有吸引力”类别,那些能够唤起较少热情的部分被归为“中性”类别,那些具有视觉冲突元素的部分被归为“没有吸引力/令人反感”类别。根据研究人员对照片文件进行的考察和整理和调查,他们能够指出,样本区域没有显著的视觉冲突,因此,没有一个选定的样本单位属于“不吸引人”的类别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信