Safety assessment of medicines available in the ‘Brazilian list of essential medicines’ in the older persons according to the Beers Criteria

F. A. S. G. Monteiro, Gabriela Mesquita Pontes, Gilsiane de Sousa Sampaio, Maria Eugênia Ribeiro Carvalho de Oliveira, Paulo M. A. Lima
{"title":"Safety assessment of medicines available in the ‘Brazilian list of essential medicines’ in the older persons according to the Beers Criteria","authors":"F. A. S. G. Monteiro, Gabriela Mesquita Pontes, Gilsiane de Sousa Sampaio, Maria Eugênia Ribeiro Carvalho de Oliveira, Paulo M. A. Lima","doi":"10.53886/gga.e0230015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To describe the safety of medicines available in the “Brazilian List of Essential Medicines” (RENAME/2022) for the main comorbidities that affect older persons according to the Beers criteria 2019. Methods: Medicines listed in RENAME and recommended by the respective Brazilian medical guidelines for the treatment of hypertension, heart failure, diabetes, and neurological/ psychiatric diseases were evaluated for their safety profiles according to the Beers criteria 2019. Results: Fifty-eight out of 529 medicines in RENAME were evaluated. Of these, 29 were included in any of the Beers criteria: 20 were classified as potentially inappropriate, 17 should be avoided due to disease exacerbation, and 14 needed to be used with caution. Considering drugs used to treat cardiovascular, diabetes, and neurological/psychiatric disorders, 40.00, 37.50 and 60.00% respectively, had some criterion for their appropriate use in older persons. Conclusion: RENAME presents alternatives for the safe treatment of older patients. In the treatment of cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, and neurodegenerative diseases, the firstchoice recommendations are available in RENAME. Regarding psychiatric disorders, safe pharmacological alternatives are still scarce and need to be better discussed.","PeriodicalId":52782,"journal":{"name":"Geriatrics Gerontology and Aging","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatrics Gerontology and Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53886/gga.e0230015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To describe the safety of medicines available in the “Brazilian List of Essential Medicines” (RENAME/2022) for the main comorbidities that affect older persons according to the Beers criteria 2019. Methods: Medicines listed in RENAME and recommended by the respective Brazilian medical guidelines for the treatment of hypertension, heart failure, diabetes, and neurological/ psychiatric diseases were evaluated for their safety profiles according to the Beers criteria 2019. Results: Fifty-eight out of 529 medicines in RENAME were evaluated. Of these, 29 were included in any of the Beers criteria: 20 were classified as potentially inappropriate, 17 should be avoided due to disease exacerbation, and 14 needed to be used with caution. Considering drugs used to treat cardiovascular, diabetes, and neurological/psychiatric disorders, 40.00, 37.50 and 60.00% respectively, had some criterion for their appropriate use in older persons. Conclusion: RENAME presents alternatives for the safe treatment of older patients. In the treatment of cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, and neurodegenerative diseases, the firstchoice recommendations are available in RENAME. Regarding psychiatric disorders, safe pharmacological alternatives are still scarce and need to be better discussed.
根据比尔斯标准对“巴西基本药物清单”中老年人可用药物的安全性进行评估
目的:根据2019年Beers标准,描述“巴西基本药物清单”(RENAME/2022)中用于影响老年人的主要合并症的药物的安全性。方法:根据2019年Beers标准,对RENAME中列出的药物以及巴西医疗指南推荐的用于治疗高血压、心力衰竭、糖尿病和神经/精神疾病的药物的安全性进行评估。结果:RENAME 529种药物中有58种得到了评价。其中,29例被列入任何Beers标准:20例被归类为可能不合适,17例因疾病恶化应避免,14例需要谨慎使用。考虑到用于治疗心血管、糖尿病和神经/精神疾病的药物,分别有40.00%、37.50%和60.00%的人对老年人的适当使用有一定的标准。结论:RENAME为老年患者的安全治疗提供了替代方案。在心血管疾病、糖尿病和神经退行性疾病的治疗中,RENAME提供了首选推荐。关于精神疾病,安全的药物替代品仍然很少,需要更好地讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信