Impediments to deprescription in Brazil: overview from a panel of geriatrics experts

Juliana Junqueira Marques Teixeira, M. P. Provin, M. P. Freitas, Fabiana Ribeiro Santana, M. T. A. Pedatella, Luis Eduardo de Araujo Rocha
{"title":"Impediments to deprescription in Brazil: overview from a panel of geriatrics experts","authors":"Juliana Junqueira Marques Teixeira, M. P. Provin, M. P. Freitas, Fabiana Ribeiro Santana, M. T. A. Pedatella, Luis Eduardo de Araujo Rocha","doi":"10.53886/gga.e0220002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To identify impediments to deprescription among older adults from the perspective of a panel of Brazilian geriatricians. Methods: The Delphi method was used to obtain a consensus among Brazilian geriatricians about the factors that influence the lack of deprescription for older adults in clinical practice. The study was developed in two stages: (i) a survey and description of potential factors involved in deprescription; and (ii) applying the results of the survey to a panel of experts to obtain a consensus. Results: The deprescription process is influenced by the interaction of three pillars of older adult health care: the prescriber, the patient-family, and the health care system. In the professional and health care systems, professional training and communication skills, prolonged clinical follow-up, access to the multidisciplinary team, medical consultations of an adequate time, and unified electronic health records were identified as facilitators of deprescription. In the patient-family pillar, clear facilitators included health literacy, no sensory or cognitive deficits, and a clinical situation of transitional or palliative care. Conclusions: Deprescription is a complex, multifactorial process that requires attention, time, and specific skills and competencies from the attending physician, but it also requires shared decision-making and a health system compatible with a culture of deprescription.","PeriodicalId":52782,"journal":{"name":"Geriatrics Gerontology and Aging","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatrics Gerontology and Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53886/gga.e0220002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To identify impediments to deprescription among older adults from the perspective of a panel of Brazilian geriatricians. Methods: The Delphi method was used to obtain a consensus among Brazilian geriatricians about the factors that influence the lack of deprescription for older adults in clinical practice. The study was developed in two stages: (i) a survey and description of potential factors involved in deprescription; and (ii) applying the results of the survey to a panel of experts to obtain a consensus. Results: The deprescription process is influenced by the interaction of three pillars of older adult health care: the prescriber, the patient-family, and the health care system. In the professional and health care systems, professional training and communication skills, prolonged clinical follow-up, access to the multidisciplinary team, medical consultations of an adequate time, and unified electronic health records were identified as facilitators of deprescription. In the patient-family pillar, clear facilitators included health literacy, no sensory or cognitive deficits, and a clinical situation of transitional or palliative care. Conclusions: Deprescription is a complex, multifactorial process that requires attention, time, and specific skills and competencies from the attending physician, but it also requires shared decision-making and a health system compatible with a culture of deprescription.
巴西取消处方的障碍:来自老年病学专家小组的概述
目的:从巴西老年病专家小组的角度确定老年人去处方的障碍。方法:采用德尔菲法对影响临床实践中老年人缺乏去处方的因素在巴西老年病学家中取得共识。这项研究分两个阶段进行:(i)调查和描述脱处方所涉及的潜在因素;(ii)将调查结果应用于专家小组,以获得共识。结果:老年人处方去处方过程受处方者、患者-家庭和卫生保健系统三大支柱的相互作用影响。在专业和卫生保健系统中,专业培训和沟通技巧、延长的临床随访、获得多学科团队的帮助、充足的医疗咨询时间和统一的电子健康记录被认为是减少处方的促进因素。在患者-家庭支柱中,明确的促进因素包括健康素养、无感觉或认知缺陷以及过渡性或姑息治疗的临床情况。结论:去处方是一个复杂的、多因素的过程,需要主治医生的注意力、时间和特定的技能和能力,但它也需要共同决策和与去处方文化相适应的卫生系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信