Prognostic assessment in palliative cancer care: is there a difference between adult and older patients?

Simone Garruth dos Santos Machado Sampaio, L. Oliveira, K. Rosa
{"title":"Prognostic assessment in palliative cancer care: is there a difference between adult and older patients?","authors":"Simone Garruth dos Santos Machado Sampaio, L. Oliveira, K. Rosa","doi":"10.53886/gga.e0210044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE: To compare factors associated with death in adults and older people with advanced cancer who were hospitalized in a palliative care unit (PCU). METHODS: Case-control study with patients (adults vs older people) admitted to a PCU of National Cancer Institute José Alencar Gomes da Silva (INCA), in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Logistic regressions (odds ratio [OR] and 95% confidence interval [95%CI]) were used to identify factors associated with death. RESULTS: The study included 205 patients, most of which were aged over 60 years old (60.5%). Among the adult patients, a Karnofsky Performance Status ≤ 40% (OR 2.54 [95%CI 1.11–3.45]) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (OR 1.09 [95%CI 1.02–1.24]) were risk factors for death, while albumin (OR 0.30 [95%CI 0.12–0.78]) was a protective factor. Among older patients, NLR (OR: 1.13 [95%CI 1.02–1.24]), C-reactive protein (CRP) (OR 1.09 [95%CI 1.02–1.17]), modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) 1 and 2 (OR 4.66 [95%CI 1.35–16.06]), CRP-to-albumin ratio (CAR) (OR 1.27 [95%CI 1.03–1.58]), and nutritional risk (OR 1.11 [95%CI 1.03–1.19]) were risk factors, whereas albumin (OR 0.23 [95%CI 0.09–0.57]) was a protective factor against death. CONCLUSIONS: Prognostic factors differed between groups. The NLR was a risk factor, and albumin was a protective factor regarding death in both groups. Additionally, CRP, mGPS, CAR, and nutritional risk were associated with an increased risk of death only among older people.","PeriodicalId":52782,"journal":{"name":"Geriatrics Gerontology and Aging","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatrics Gerontology and Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53886/gga.e0210044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare factors associated with death in adults and older people with advanced cancer who were hospitalized in a palliative care unit (PCU). METHODS: Case-control study with patients (adults vs older people) admitted to a PCU of National Cancer Institute José Alencar Gomes da Silva (INCA), in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Logistic regressions (odds ratio [OR] and 95% confidence interval [95%CI]) were used to identify factors associated with death. RESULTS: The study included 205 patients, most of which were aged over 60 years old (60.5%). Among the adult patients, a Karnofsky Performance Status ≤ 40% (OR 2.54 [95%CI 1.11–3.45]) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (OR 1.09 [95%CI 1.02–1.24]) were risk factors for death, while albumin (OR 0.30 [95%CI 0.12–0.78]) was a protective factor. Among older patients, NLR (OR: 1.13 [95%CI 1.02–1.24]), C-reactive protein (CRP) (OR 1.09 [95%CI 1.02–1.17]), modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) 1 and 2 (OR 4.66 [95%CI 1.35–16.06]), CRP-to-albumin ratio (CAR) (OR 1.27 [95%CI 1.03–1.58]), and nutritional risk (OR 1.11 [95%CI 1.03–1.19]) were risk factors, whereas albumin (OR 0.23 [95%CI 0.09–0.57]) was a protective factor against death. CONCLUSIONS: Prognostic factors differed between groups. The NLR was a risk factor, and albumin was a protective factor regarding death in both groups. Additionally, CRP, mGPS, CAR, and nutritional risk were associated with an increased risk of death only among older people.
姑息性癌症治疗的预后评估:成人和老年患者之间有区别吗?
目的:比较在姑息治疗病房(PCU)住院的成人和老年晚期癌症患者的死亡相关因素。方法:在巴西里约热内卢巴西国家癌症研究所josise Alencar Gomes da Silva (INCA) PCU住院的患者(成人与老年人)进行病例对照研究。采用Logistic回归(优势比[OR]和95%可信区间[95% ci])确定与死亡相关的因素。结果:纳入205例患者,年龄≥60岁者占60.5%。成人患者中,Karnofsky Performance Status≤40% (OR 2.54 [95%CI 1.11-3.45])和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(OR 1.09 [95%CI 1.02-1.24])是死亡的危险因素,白蛋白(OR 0.30 [95%CI 0.12-0.78])是死亡的保护因素。在老年患者中,NLR (OR: 1.13 [95%CI 1.02-1.24])、c反应蛋白(CRP) (OR 1.09 [95%CI 1.02-1.17])、改良格拉斯哥预后评分(mGPS) 1和2 (OR 4.66 [95%CI 1.35-16.06])、CRP-白蛋白比(CAR) (OR 1.27 [95%CI 1.03-1.58])和营养风险(OR 1.11 [95%CI 1.03-1.19])是危险因素,而白蛋白(OR 0.23 [95%CI 0.09-0.57])是死亡的保护因素。结论:两组预后因素存在差异。NLR是两组死亡的危险因素,白蛋白是两组死亡的保护因素。此外,CRP、mGPS、CAR和营养风险仅在老年人中与死亡风险增加相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信