Ghana during the First World War: The Colonial Administration of Sir Hugh Clifford

IF 0.3 4区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY
D. Maier
{"title":"Ghana during the First World War: The Colonial Administration of Sir Hugh Clifford","authors":"D. Maier","doi":"10.5860/choice.51-3995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ghana during the First World War: The Colonial Administration of Sir Hugh Clifford. By Elizabeth Wrangham. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press, 2013. Pp. xxvii, 310; appendices, footnotes, bibliography. $50.00 paper.Through a comprehensive scouring of the Colonial Office records relating to the Gold Coast 1912-1919, Elizabeth Wrangham, Senior Research Fellow of Roehampton University, has produced a meticulously documented and interesting new history of the Hugh Clifford colonial governorship of Ghana. Wrangham's overarching argument is that Clifford had noble intentions for development of the colony when he arrived in late 1912, but that these admirable plans were thwarted by the strictures of the war: no money, shrinking personnel, and lack of essential imports (railroad stock, building materials, fuel). She maintains that Clifford's blueprint for development was sound and he has not received sufficient credit for his vision, which was instead operationalized by his successor, the disappointingly middle-class, albeit blessed with better timing, Governor Guggisberg, who has received much more (Wrangham implies undeserved) recognition from historians. The book is clearly and systematically organized with three chapters on Ghana's prewar situation and Clifford's initial goals as governor, six chapters on the war years, and a post- war conclusion. The war chapters are thematically focused on shipping, the economy, revenue and finance, social welfare, and governance issues.Several themes emerge early and are reiterated throughout the book. The British administration was thin: limited numbers of personnel in political administration, medical service, military and police officers, and government inspection. The numbers of colonial officials, incredibly small for the size of the colony and territories, were reduced by another third during the war. This is not new information about British colonial rule, but Wrangham provides detailed evidence year after year to leave no doubt. A meager administration however was sustainable, according to Wrangham, because Ghanaians were prospering economically. She depicts a colony whose economy was expanding rapidly from global trade, arguing that while Ghanaians had become overly dependent on a single export (cocoa) and simultaneously imported goods (food, soap, fuels, tools), they were reaping an increased standard of living. Such was clearly the view of the colonial government at the time also, but one does wonder if the economic welfare of a whole country is best defined solely by success in external trade, and Wrangham makes only minimal effort to explore internal exchange.The book implicitly engages a wider argument about colonialism. Wrangham argues that export-import profits, despite periodic constriction due to the wartime vagaries of ocean shipping (submarine warfare) facilitated Ghanaian acquiescence and even positive support of the British during the war. …","PeriodicalId":45676,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AFRICAN HISTORICAL STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AFRICAN HISTORICAL STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.51-3995","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Ghana during the First World War: The Colonial Administration of Sir Hugh Clifford. By Elizabeth Wrangham. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press, 2013. Pp. xxvii, 310; appendices, footnotes, bibliography. $50.00 paper.Through a comprehensive scouring of the Colonial Office records relating to the Gold Coast 1912-1919, Elizabeth Wrangham, Senior Research Fellow of Roehampton University, has produced a meticulously documented and interesting new history of the Hugh Clifford colonial governorship of Ghana. Wrangham's overarching argument is that Clifford had noble intentions for development of the colony when he arrived in late 1912, but that these admirable plans were thwarted by the strictures of the war: no money, shrinking personnel, and lack of essential imports (railroad stock, building materials, fuel). She maintains that Clifford's blueprint for development was sound and he has not received sufficient credit for his vision, which was instead operationalized by his successor, the disappointingly middle-class, albeit blessed with better timing, Governor Guggisberg, who has received much more (Wrangham implies undeserved) recognition from historians. The book is clearly and systematically organized with three chapters on Ghana's prewar situation and Clifford's initial goals as governor, six chapters on the war years, and a post- war conclusion. The war chapters are thematically focused on shipping, the economy, revenue and finance, social welfare, and governance issues.Several themes emerge early and are reiterated throughout the book. The British administration was thin: limited numbers of personnel in political administration, medical service, military and police officers, and government inspection. The numbers of colonial officials, incredibly small for the size of the colony and territories, were reduced by another third during the war. This is not new information about British colonial rule, but Wrangham provides detailed evidence year after year to leave no doubt. A meager administration however was sustainable, according to Wrangham, because Ghanaians were prospering economically. She depicts a colony whose economy was expanding rapidly from global trade, arguing that while Ghanaians had become overly dependent on a single export (cocoa) and simultaneously imported goods (food, soap, fuels, tools), they were reaping an increased standard of living. Such was clearly the view of the colonial government at the time also, but one does wonder if the economic welfare of a whole country is best defined solely by success in external trade, and Wrangham makes only minimal effort to explore internal exchange.The book implicitly engages a wider argument about colonialism. Wrangham argues that export-import profits, despite periodic constriction due to the wartime vagaries of ocean shipping (submarine warfare) facilitated Ghanaian acquiescence and even positive support of the British during the war. …
第一次世界大战期间的加纳:休·克利福德爵士的殖民管理
第一次世界大战期间的加纳:休·克利福德爵士的殖民管理。伊丽莎白·兰厄姆著。达勒姆,北卡罗来纳州:卡罗莱纳学术出版社,2013。第27页,310页;附录、脚注、参考书目。50.00美元。罗汉普顿大学高级研究员伊丽莎白·兰厄姆(Elizabeth Wrangham)通过对1912年至1919年黄金海岸相关的殖民办公室记录的全面梳理,为加纳的休·克利福德(Hugh Clifford)殖民总督制作了一部精心记录的有趣的新历史。兰厄姆的主要论点是,克利福德在1912年底到达殖民地时,有发展殖民地的崇高意图,但这些令人钦佩的计划受到战争的限制:没有钱,人员减少,缺乏必要的进口(铁路库存,建筑材料,燃料)。她坚持认为,克利福德的发展蓝图是健全的,他的愿景没有得到足够的赞誉,而是由他的继任者,令人失望的中产阶级,尽管幸运地拥有更好的时机,古吉斯伯格州长,他得到了历史学家更多的认可(Wrangham暗示不值得)。这本书清晰而系统地组织了三章关于加纳战前的情况和克利福德作为总督的最初目标,六章关于战争年代,以及战后的结论。战争章节的主题集中在航运、经济、税收和财政、社会福利和治理问题上。几个主题很早就出现了,并在全书中反复出现。当时的英国政府非常单薄,在政治管理、医疗服务、军队和警察、政府检查等方面的人员都非常有限。殖民地官员的数量相对于殖民地和领土的规模来说少得令人难以置信,在战争期间又减少了三分之一。这并不是关于英国殖民统治的新信息,但朗厄姆年复一年地提供了详细的证据,让人毫无疑问。然而,根据Wrangham的说法,一个微薄的政府是可持续的,因为加纳人在经济上繁荣。她描述了一个经济从全球贸易中迅速扩张的殖民地,她认为,虽然加纳人过度依赖单一出口(可可),同时依赖进口商品(食品、肥皂、燃料、工具),但他们的生活水平正在提高。这显然也是当时殖民政府的观点,但人们确实想知道,整个国家的经济福利是否最好仅由对外贸易的成功来定义,而朗厄姆在探索内部交换方面只付出了最小的努力。这本书含蓄地涉及了关于殖民主义的更广泛的争论。Wrangham认为,尽管由于战时海上运输的变幻莫测(潜艇战)而周期性地受到限制,但进出口利润促使加纳在战争期间默许甚至积极支持英国。...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The International Journal of African Historical Studies (IJAHS) is devoted to the study of the African past. Norman Bennett was the founder and guiding force behind the journal’s growth from its first incarnation at Boston University as African Historical Studies in 1968. He remained its editor for more than thirty years. The title was expanded to the International Journal of African Historical Studies in 1972, when Africana Publishers Holmes and Meier took over publication and distribution for the next decade. Beginning in 1982, the African Studies Center once again assumed full responsibility for production and distribution. Jean Hay served as the journal’s production editor from 1979 to 1995, and editor from 1998 to her retirement in 2005. Michael DiBlasi is the current editor, and James McCann and Diana Wylie are associate editors of the journal. Members of the editorial board include: Emmanuel Akyeampong, Peter Alegi, Misty Bastian, Sara Berry, Barbara Cooper, Marc Epprecht, Lidwien Kapteijns, Meredith McKittrick, Pashington Obang, David Schoenbrun, Heather Sharkey, Ann B. Stahl, John Thornton, and Rudolph Ware III. The journal publishes three issues each year (April, August, and December). Articles, notes, and documents submitted to the journal should be based on original research and framed in terms of historical analysis. Contributions in archaeology, history, anthropology, historical ecology, political science, political ecology, and economic history are welcome. Articles that highlight European administrators, settlers, or colonial policies should be submitted elsewhere, unless they deal substantially with interactions with (or the affects on) African societies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信