{"title":"Ghana during the First World War: The Colonial Administration of Sir Hugh Clifford","authors":"D. Maier","doi":"10.5860/choice.51-3995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ghana during the First World War: The Colonial Administration of Sir Hugh Clifford. By Elizabeth Wrangham. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press, 2013. Pp. xxvii, 310; appendices, footnotes, bibliography. $50.00 paper.Through a comprehensive scouring of the Colonial Office records relating to the Gold Coast 1912-1919, Elizabeth Wrangham, Senior Research Fellow of Roehampton University, has produced a meticulously documented and interesting new history of the Hugh Clifford colonial governorship of Ghana. Wrangham's overarching argument is that Clifford had noble intentions for development of the colony when he arrived in late 1912, but that these admirable plans were thwarted by the strictures of the war: no money, shrinking personnel, and lack of essential imports (railroad stock, building materials, fuel). She maintains that Clifford's blueprint for development was sound and he has not received sufficient credit for his vision, which was instead operationalized by his successor, the disappointingly middle-class, albeit blessed with better timing, Governor Guggisberg, who has received much more (Wrangham implies undeserved) recognition from historians. The book is clearly and systematically organized with three chapters on Ghana's prewar situation and Clifford's initial goals as governor, six chapters on the war years, and a post- war conclusion. The war chapters are thematically focused on shipping, the economy, revenue and finance, social welfare, and governance issues.Several themes emerge early and are reiterated throughout the book. The British administration was thin: limited numbers of personnel in political administration, medical service, military and police officers, and government inspection. The numbers of colonial officials, incredibly small for the size of the colony and territories, were reduced by another third during the war. This is not new information about British colonial rule, but Wrangham provides detailed evidence year after year to leave no doubt. A meager administration however was sustainable, according to Wrangham, because Ghanaians were prospering economically. She depicts a colony whose economy was expanding rapidly from global trade, arguing that while Ghanaians had become overly dependent on a single export (cocoa) and simultaneously imported goods (food, soap, fuels, tools), they were reaping an increased standard of living. Such was clearly the view of the colonial government at the time also, but one does wonder if the economic welfare of a whole country is best defined solely by success in external trade, and Wrangham makes only minimal effort to explore internal exchange.The book implicitly engages a wider argument about colonialism. Wrangham argues that export-import profits, despite periodic constriction due to the wartime vagaries of ocean shipping (submarine warfare) facilitated Ghanaian acquiescence and even positive support of the British during the war. …","PeriodicalId":45676,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AFRICAN HISTORICAL STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AFRICAN HISTORICAL STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.51-3995","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
Ghana during the First World War: The Colonial Administration of Sir Hugh Clifford. By Elizabeth Wrangham. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press, 2013. Pp. xxvii, 310; appendices, footnotes, bibliography. $50.00 paper.Through a comprehensive scouring of the Colonial Office records relating to the Gold Coast 1912-1919, Elizabeth Wrangham, Senior Research Fellow of Roehampton University, has produced a meticulously documented and interesting new history of the Hugh Clifford colonial governorship of Ghana. Wrangham's overarching argument is that Clifford had noble intentions for development of the colony when he arrived in late 1912, but that these admirable plans were thwarted by the strictures of the war: no money, shrinking personnel, and lack of essential imports (railroad stock, building materials, fuel). She maintains that Clifford's blueprint for development was sound and he has not received sufficient credit for his vision, which was instead operationalized by his successor, the disappointingly middle-class, albeit blessed with better timing, Governor Guggisberg, who has received much more (Wrangham implies undeserved) recognition from historians. The book is clearly and systematically organized with three chapters on Ghana's prewar situation and Clifford's initial goals as governor, six chapters on the war years, and a post- war conclusion. The war chapters are thematically focused on shipping, the economy, revenue and finance, social welfare, and governance issues.Several themes emerge early and are reiterated throughout the book. The British administration was thin: limited numbers of personnel in political administration, medical service, military and police officers, and government inspection. The numbers of colonial officials, incredibly small for the size of the colony and territories, were reduced by another third during the war. This is not new information about British colonial rule, but Wrangham provides detailed evidence year after year to leave no doubt. A meager administration however was sustainable, according to Wrangham, because Ghanaians were prospering economically. She depicts a colony whose economy was expanding rapidly from global trade, arguing that while Ghanaians had become overly dependent on a single export (cocoa) and simultaneously imported goods (food, soap, fuels, tools), they were reaping an increased standard of living. Such was clearly the view of the colonial government at the time also, but one does wonder if the economic welfare of a whole country is best defined solely by success in external trade, and Wrangham makes only minimal effort to explore internal exchange.The book implicitly engages a wider argument about colonialism. Wrangham argues that export-import profits, despite periodic constriction due to the wartime vagaries of ocean shipping (submarine warfare) facilitated Ghanaian acquiescence and even positive support of the British during the war. …
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of African Historical Studies (IJAHS) is devoted to the study of the African past. Norman Bennett was the founder and guiding force behind the journal’s growth from its first incarnation at Boston University as African Historical Studies in 1968. He remained its editor for more than thirty years. The title was expanded to the International Journal of African Historical Studies in 1972, when Africana Publishers Holmes and Meier took over publication and distribution for the next decade. Beginning in 1982, the African Studies Center once again assumed full responsibility for production and distribution. Jean Hay served as the journal’s production editor from 1979 to 1995, and editor from 1998 to her retirement in 2005. Michael DiBlasi is the current editor, and James McCann and Diana Wylie are associate editors of the journal. Members of the editorial board include: Emmanuel Akyeampong, Peter Alegi, Misty Bastian, Sara Berry, Barbara Cooper, Marc Epprecht, Lidwien Kapteijns, Meredith McKittrick, Pashington Obang, David Schoenbrun, Heather Sharkey, Ann B. Stahl, John Thornton, and Rudolph Ware III. The journal publishes three issues each year (April, August, and December). Articles, notes, and documents submitted to the journal should be based on original research and framed in terms of historical analysis. Contributions in archaeology, history, anthropology, historical ecology, political science, political ecology, and economic history are welcome. Articles that highlight European administrators, settlers, or colonial policies should be submitted elsewhere, unless they deal substantially with interactions with (or the affects on) African societies.