State of War: The Political Economy of American Warfare, 1945-2011

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Parameters Pub Date : 2012-09-06 DOI:10.5860/choice.50-4556
Paul A. C. Koistinen
{"title":"State of War: The Political Economy of American Warfare, 1945-2011","authors":"Paul A. C. Koistinen","doi":"10.5860/choice.50-4556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In his farewell speech, President Dwight Eisenhower famously warned us of the dangers of a military-industrial complex (MIC). In Paul Koistinen's sobering new book, that warning appears to have been both prophetic and largely ignored. As the final volume in his magisterial study of the political economy of American warfare, State of War describes the bipolar world that developed from the rivalry between the U.S. and USSR, showing how seventy years of defence spending have bred a monster that has sunk its claws into the very fabric of American life. Koistinen underscores how during the second half of the twentieth century and well into the twenty-first, the United States for the first time in its history began to maintain large military structures during peacetime. Many factors led to that result: the American economy stood practically alone in a war-ravaged world; the federal government, especially executive authority, was at the pinnacle of its powers; the military accumulated unprecedented influence over national security; and weaponry became much more sophisticated following World War II. Koistinen describes how the rise of the MIC was preceded by a gradual process of institutional adaptation and then supported and reinforced by the willing participation of Big Science and its industrial partners, the broader academic world, and a proliferation of think tanks. He also evaluates the effects of ongoing defines budgets within the context of the nation's economy since the 1950s. Over time, the MIC effectively blocked efforts to reduce expenditures, control the arms race, improve relations with adversaries, or adopt more enlightened policies toward the developing world--all the while manipulating the public on behalf of national security to sustain the warfare state. Now twenty years after the Soviet Union's demise, defence budgets are higher than at any time during the Cold War. As Koistinen observes, more than six decades of militaristic mobilisation for stabilising a turbulent world have firmly entrenched the state of war as a state of mind for our nation. Collectively, his five-volume opus provides an unparalleled analysis of the economics of America's wars from the colonial period to the present, illuminating its impact upon the nation's military campaigns, foreign policy, and domestic life.","PeriodicalId":35242,"journal":{"name":"Parameters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parameters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.50-4556","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

In his farewell speech, President Dwight Eisenhower famously warned us of the dangers of a military-industrial complex (MIC). In Paul Koistinen's sobering new book, that warning appears to have been both prophetic and largely ignored. As the final volume in his magisterial study of the political economy of American warfare, State of War describes the bipolar world that developed from the rivalry between the U.S. and USSR, showing how seventy years of defence spending have bred a monster that has sunk its claws into the very fabric of American life. Koistinen underscores how during the second half of the twentieth century and well into the twenty-first, the United States for the first time in its history began to maintain large military structures during peacetime. Many factors led to that result: the American economy stood practically alone in a war-ravaged world; the federal government, especially executive authority, was at the pinnacle of its powers; the military accumulated unprecedented influence over national security; and weaponry became much more sophisticated following World War II. Koistinen describes how the rise of the MIC was preceded by a gradual process of institutional adaptation and then supported and reinforced by the willing participation of Big Science and its industrial partners, the broader academic world, and a proliferation of think tanks. He also evaluates the effects of ongoing defines budgets within the context of the nation's economy since the 1950s. Over time, the MIC effectively blocked efforts to reduce expenditures, control the arms race, improve relations with adversaries, or adopt more enlightened policies toward the developing world--all the while manipulating the public on behalf of national security to sustain the warfare state. Now twenty years after the Soviet Union's demise, defence budgets are higher than at any time during the Cold War. As Koistinen observes, more than six decades of militaristic mobilisation for stabilising a turbulent world have firmly entrenched the state of war as a state of mind for our nation. Collectively, his five-volume opus provides an unparalleled analysis of the economics of America's wars from the colonial period to the present, illuminating its impact upon the nation's military campaigns, foreign policy, and domestic life.
战争状态:1945-2011年美国战争的政治经济学
德怀特·艾森豪威尔(Dwight Eisenhower)总统在他的告别演说中警告我们军事工业复合体(MIC)的危险。在Paul Koistinen发人深省的新书中,这一警告似乎既是预言,又在很大程度上被忽视了。作为他对美国战争的政治经济学权威研究的最后一卷,《战争状态》描述了从美国和苏联之间的竞争中发展起来的两极世界,展示了70年的国防开支如何培育了一个怪物,它的爪子已经潜入了美国人生活的结构。Koistinen强调了在20世纪下半叶和进入21世纪后,美国在其历史上第一次开始在和平时期维持大型军事结构。许多因素导致了这一结果:美国经济在一个饱受战争蹂躏的世界中几乎是孤立的;联邦政府,特别是行政当局,处于权力的顶峰;军队对国家安全积累了前所未有的影响力;第二次世界大战后,武器装备变得更加复杂。Koistinen描述了在MIC的崛起之前,如何经历了一个渐进的制度适应过程,然后得到了大科学及其工业伙伴、更广泛的学术界和智囊团的自愿参与的支持和加强。他还在20世纪50年代以来的国家经济背景下评估了持续定义预算的影响。随着时间的推移,MIC有效地阻止了削减开支、控制军备竞赛、改善与对手的关系或对发展中国家采取更开明的政策的努力——同时以国家安全的名义操纵公众,以维持战争状态。在苏联解体20年后的今天,国防预算比冷战时期的任何时候都要高。正如Koistinen所观察到的那样,60多年来为稳定动荡的世界而进行的军国主义动员,已经牢固地确立了战争状态作为我国精神状态的地位。总的来说,他的五卷本著作对从殖民时期到现在的美国战争的经济学进行了无与伦比的分析,阐明了它对国家军事行动、外交政策和国内生活的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Parameters
Parameters Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信