Test-Retest Reliability of the SWAY Balance Mobile Application

R. Amick, A. Chaparro, J. Patterson, M. Jorgensen
{"title":"Test-Retest Reliability of the SWAY Balance Mobile Application","authors":"R. Amick, A. Chaparro, J. Patterson, M. Jorgensen","doi":"10.7309/jmtm.4.2.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The SWAY Balance Mobile Application is an FDA-cleared balance testing system which uses the built-in tri-axial accelerometers of a mobile electronic device to objectively assess postural movement. The system was designed to provide a means of quantitative balance assessment in clinical and on-field environments. The purpose of this study was to determine the intrasession and intersession reliability, as well as the minimum difference to be considered real, of the SWAY Balance Mobile Application. Methods: 24 individuals (15 male, 9 female; aged 25.96 (95.78 years)) performed the SWAY Balance protocol twice per testing session over a period of three testing sessions. Each testing session was separated by a minimum of seven days. Interclass Correlation Coefficients were calculated as an indication of the test-retest reliability. The minimum difference to be considered real was calculated to determine the minimum score change necessary to indicate an actual change in balance performance. Results: Mean SWAY Balance scores ranged from 86.90 (914.37) to 89.90 (911.19). Repeated measures ANOVA revealed no significant mean differences between SWAY balance scores of the experimental trials (F(5,115) 0.673; p 0.65). Excellent reliability was found (ICC(3,1) 0.76; SEM 5.39) with a minimum difference to be considered real of approximately 15. Conclusions: Results indicate that SWAY provides excellent overall reliability. However, it may be appropriate to have subjects perform a familiarization trial at the beginning of each testing session. Additionally, SWAY may demonstrate a ceiling effect when assessing balance improvements in those who already demonstrate good balance.","PeriodicalId":87305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of mobile technology in medicine","volume":"4 1","pages":"40-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"46","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of mobile technology in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7309/jmtm.4.2.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 46

Abstract

Background: The SWAY Balance Mobile Application is an FDA-cleared balance testing system which uses the built-in tri-axial accelerometers of a mobile electronic device to objectively assess postural movement. The system was designed to provide a means of quantitative balance assessment in clinical and on-field environments. The purpose of this study was to determine the intrasession and intersession reliability, as well as the minimum difference to be considered real, of the SWAY Balance Mobile Application. Methods: 24 individuals (15 male, 9 female; aged 25.96 (95.78 years)) performed the SWAY Balance protocol twice per testing session over a period of three testing sessions. Each testing session was separated by a minimum of seven days. Interclass Correlation Coefficients were calculated as an indication of the test-retest reliability. The minimum difference to be considered real was calculated to determine the minimum score change necessary to indicate an actual change in balance performance. Results: Mean SWAY Balance scores ranged from 86.90 (914.37) to 89.90 (911.19). Repeated measures ANOVA revealed no significant mean differences between SWAY balance scores of the experimental trials (F(5,115) 0.673; p 0.65). Excellent reliability was found (ICC(3,1) 0.76; SEM 5.39) with a minimum difference to be considered real of approximately 15. Conclusions: Results indicate that SWAY provides excellent overall reliability. However, it may be appropriate to have subjects perform a familiarization trial at the beginning of each testing session. Additionally, SWAY may demonstrate a ceiling effect when assessing balance improvements in those who already demonstrate good balance.
SWAY Balance移动应用程序的重测可靠性
背景:SWAY平衡移动应用程序是fda批准的平衡测试系统,它使用移动电子设备的内置三轴加速度计来客观评估姿势运动。该系统旨在为临床和现场环境提供定量平衡评估的手段。本研究的目的是确定会话内和会话间的可靠性,以及被认为真实的最小差异,SWAY平衡移动应用程序。方法:24只,其中男15只,女9只;年龄25.96岁(95.78岁)的参与者在三次测试期间,每次测试两次执行SWAY Balance协议。每次测试至少间隔7天。计算类间相关系数作为重测信度的指示。计算被认为是真实的最小差异,以确定表明平衡性能实际变化所需的最小分数变化。结果:SWAY平均平衡评分为86.90(914.37)~ 89.90(911.19)。重复测量方差分析显示,实验试验的SWAY平衡评分之间无显著差异(F(5,115) 0.673;p 0.65)。发现极好的信度(ICC(3,1) 0.76;SEM 5.39),最小差值约为15。结论:结果表明SWAY具有良好的总体信度。然而,在每次测试开始时让受试者进行熟悉性试验可能是合适的。此外,SWAY在评估那些已经表现出良好平衡的人的平衡改善时可能会显示出天花板效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信