Chan Jan-Bond, Teh Wee-Min, N. Hong-Kee, Ik Zu-Quan, S. Khairy-Shamel, E. Zunaina, A. Liza-Sharmini
{"title":"REST AN INNOVATIVE RAPID EYE SCREENING TEST","authors":"Chan Jan-Bond, Teh Wee-Min, N. Hong-Kee, Ik Zu-Quan, S. Khairy-Shamel, E. Zunaina, A. Liza-Sharmini","doi":"10.7309/jmtm.4.3.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Results: Mean visual acuity using ETDRS was 0.086 9 0.194 for right eye (RE) and 0.085 9 0.196 for left eye (LE) while REST measurement was 0.091 9 0.182 for RE and 0.098 9 0.203 for LE. There was significant and strong direct correlation between visual acuity using ETDRS and REST in both eyes (RE: r 0.829; p B 0.001, LE: r 0.871; p B 0.001). The 95% limits of agreement between the two charts was 90.11 LogMAR for right eye and 90.10 LogMAR for left eye. Time taken for REST was significantly shorter than ETDRS (p B 0.001). Conclusion: REST is accurate and time-saving, thus potentially ideal for mass screening in remote area.","PeriodicalId":87305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of mobile technology in medicine","volume":"4 1","pages":"20-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of mobile technology in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7309/jmtm.4.3.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
Abstract
Results: Mean visual acuity using ETDRS was 0.086 9 0.194 for right eye (RE) and 0.085 9 0.196 for left eye (LE) while REST measurement was 0.091 9 0.182 for RE and 0.098 9 0.203 for LE. There was significant and strong direct correlation between visual acuity using ETDRS and REST in both eyes (RE: r 0.829; p B 0.001, LE: r 0.871; p B 0.001). The 95% limits of agreement between the two charts was 90.11 LogMAR for right eye and 90.10 LogMAR for left eye. Time taken for REST was significantly shorter than ETDRS (p B 0.001). Conclusion: REST is accurate and time-saving, thus potentially ideal for mass screening in remote area.