THE ROLE OF SMARTPHONES IN THE RECORDING AND DISSEMINATION OF MEDICAL IMAGES

Michael Kirk, Sarah R Hunter-Smith, Katrina M. Smith, D. Hunter-Smith
{"title":"THE ROLE OF SMARTPHONES IN THE RECORDING AND DISSEMINATION OF MEDICAL IMAGES","authors":"Michael Kirk, Sarah R Hunter-Smith, Katrina M. Smith, D. Hunter-Smith","doi":"10.7309/JMTM.3.2.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:Smartphones have evolved rapidly in the medical profession, and can now produce highquality medical images, providing a quick and simple method of image distribution. This has thepotential to improve clinical care of patients, but comes with specific ethical and medico-legalconsiderations that include issues of confidentiality, privacy and policy control.Aim: To quantify the use, distribution and storage of medical images taken using smartphones byclinicians, along with their perceptions regarding policies, practices and patient care.Methods: All clinicians and medical students employed or undergoing rotation at Peninsula Healthduring March 2012 were asked to participate in a de-identified, 36 item, online survey administeredby SurveyMonkey. The survey questioned respondent’s demographics, and issues surrounding therecording and dissemination of medical images using smartphones.Results: 134 responses were received. Most respondents were from the surgical discipline, followedby medicine, then emergency. Sixty five per cent admitted to taking medical images on theirsmartphones, yet no consent was obtained in almost a quarter (24%). When consent was taken, itwas predominantly verbal, but only documented 23% of the time. Of those who took medicalimages, 64% stored them personally and 82% shared them with someone else, mostly for input fromanother clinician. Forty three per cent were aware that an institutional policy existed, but only 28%had read the policy.Conclusion: Whilst the use of smartphones in a hospital setting is inevitable, the results obtainedhighlight issues related to privacy, confidentiality and patient care. This study will enable discussionand formulation of an evidence-based hospital policy","PeriodicalId":87305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of mobile technology in medicine","volume":"3 1","pages":"40-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of mobile technology in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7309/JMTM.3.2.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Background:Smartphones have evolved rapidly in the medical profession, and can now produce highquality medical images, providing a quick and simple method of image distribution. This has thepotential to improve clinical care of patients, but comes with specific ethical and medico-legalconsiderations that include issues of confidentiality, privacy and policy control.Aim: To quantify the use, distribution and storage of medical images taken using smartphones byclinicians, along with their perceptions regarding policies, practices and patient care.Methods: All clinicians and medical students employed or undergoing rotation at Peninsula Healthduring March 2012 were asked to participate in a de-identified, 36 item, online survey administeredby SurveyMonkey. The survey questioned respondent’s demographics, and issues surrounding therecording and dissemination of medical images using smartphones.Results: 134 responses were received. Most respondents were from the surgical discipline, followedby medicine, then emergency. Sixty five per cent admitted to taking medical images on theirsmartphones, yet no consent was obtained in almost a quarter (24%). When consent was taken, itwas predominantly verbal, but only documented 23% of the time. Of those who took medicalimages, 64% stored them personally and 82% shared them with someone else, mostly for input fromanother clinician. Forty three per cent were aware that an institutional policy existed, but only 28%had read the policy.Conclusion: Whilst the use of smartphones in a hospital setting is inevitable, the results obtainedhighlight issues related to privacy, confidentiality and patient care. This study will enable discussionand formulation of an evidence-based hospital policy
智能手机在记录和传播医学图像中的作用
背景:智能手机在医疗行业发展迅速,现在可以产生高质量的医学图像,提供了一种快速简单的图像分发方法。这有可能改善患者的临床护理,但也会带来具体的伦理和医学法律方面的考虑,包括保密、隐私和政策控制等问题。目的:量化临床医生使用智能手机拍摄的医学图像的使用、分发和存储情况,以及他们对政策、做法和患者护理的看法。方法:2012年3月在半岛医疗中心工作或轮岗的所有临床医生和医学生都被要求参加一项由SurveyMonkey管理的36项匿名在线调查。该调查询问了受访者的人口统计数据,以及使用智能手机记录和传播医学图像的相关问题。结果:共收到134份回复。大多数受访者来自外科学科,其次是内科,然后是急诊。65%的人承认用智能手机拍摄过医学图像,但有近四分之一(24%)的人没有征得同意。当同意被采纳时,它主要是口头的,但只有23%的时间记录在案。在那些拍摄医学图像的人中,64%的人将其存储在个人中,82%的人与他人分享,主要是为了从其他临床医生那里获得信息。43%的人知道存在制度性政策,但只有28%的人读过该政策。结论:虽然在医院环境中使用智能手机是不可避免的,但获得的结果突出了与隐私、保密和患者护理相关的问题。本研究将促进循证医院政策的讨论和制定
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信