Smartphone and medical applications use by contemporary surgical trainees: A national questionnaire study

T. Carter, Alexandre Jais, M. Rodrigues, A. Robertson, R. Brady
{"title":"Smartphone and medical applications use by contemporary surgical trainees: A national questionnaire study","authors":"T. Carter, Alexandre Jais, M. Rodrigues, A. Robertson, R. Brady","doi":"10.7309/JMTM.3.2.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Results: Thirty three percent (76/233) of trainees responded. Ninety two percent owned a smartphone. Trainees used smartphones at work for email (96%), calls (85%), SMS/MMS (81%), Internet browsing (76%) and medical app access (55%). Eighty two percent of respondents had downloaded at least one app, including clinical guidelines (70%), medical calculators (59%), anatomy guides (50%) and study aids (32%). There was no statistical difference between demographics and smartphone use or app downloads. Thirty five percent had used apps to help make clinical decisions. Thirteen percent felt they had encountered erroneous outputs, according to their own judgement and/or calculation. Fifty eight percent felt apps should be compulsorily regulated however only one trainee could name a regulatory body. Conclusion: Smartphone possession amongst NHS surgical trainees is high. Knowledge of app regulation is poor, with potential safety concerns regarding inaccurate outputs. Integration of apps, developed and approved by an appropriate authority, may improve confidence when integrating them into training and healthcare delivery.","PeriodicalId":87305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of mobile technology in medicine","volume":"3 1","pages":"2-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of mobile technology in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7309/JMTM.3.2.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Results: Thirty three percent (76/233) of trainees responded. Ninety two percent owned a smartphone. Trainees used smartphones at work for email (96%), calls (85%), SMS/MMS (81%), Internet browsing (76%) and medical app access (55%). Eighty two percent of respondents had downloaded at least one app, including clinical guidelines (70%), medical calculators (59%), anatomy guides (50%) and study aids (32%). There was no statistical difference between demographics and smartphone use or app downloads. Thirty five percent had used apps to help make clinical decisions. Thirteen percent felt they had encountered erroneous outputs, according to their own judgement and/or calculation. Fifty eight percent felt apps should be compulsorily regulated however only one trainee could name a regulatory body. Conclusion: Smartphone possession amongst NHS surgical trainees is high. Knowledge of app regulation is poor, with potential safety concerns regarding inaccurate outputs. Integration of apps, developed and approved by an appropriate authority, may improve confidence when integrating them into training and healthcare delivery.
当代外科受训者使用智能手机和医疗应用程序:一项全国问卷调查研究
结果:33%(76/233)的学员做出了回应。92%的人拥有智能手机。学员在工作中使用智能手机收发电子邮件(96%)、打电话(85%)、发短信/彩信(81%)、上网(76%)和访问医疗应用程序(55%)。82%的受访者至少下载了一个应用程序,包括临床指南(70%)、医疗计算器(59%)、解剖指南(50%)和学习辅助(32%)。人口统计数据与智能手机使用或应用下载量之间没有统计学差异。35%的人使用应用程序来帮助做出临床决定。13%的人认为,根据他们自己的判断和/或计算,他们遇到了错误的输出。58%的受访者认为应用程序应该受到强制监管,但只有一名受训者能说出监管机构的名字。结论:NHS外科培训生智能手机拥有率较高。对应用程序监管的了解很少,对不准确的输出存在潜在的安全担忧。整合由适当机构开发和批准的应用程序,可以提高将其整合到培训和医疗保健服务中的信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信