What’s Unethical About Interprofessional Collaboration?

BioethiqueOnline Pub Date : 2016-03-04 DOI:10.7202/1035492AR

Lise Lévesque

引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this commentary, the beneficial value of the relational aspects of interprofessional collaboration is emphasized to demonstrate that conflict of interests arising in self-referrals are more complex than presented in classic cases of conflicts of interest. A dialog involving health professionals and ethicists is recommended to better understand the relational aspects that are essential to patient wellness and autonomy, in relation to the various care and organizational contexts across private and public sectors. The goal is to inform policy making on management of conflicts of interests associated with self-referrals.

查看原文本刊更多论文

跨专业合作有哪些不道德之处?

在这篇评论中，强调了跨专业合作的关系方面的有益价值，以证明在自我推荐中产生的利益冲突比在经典的利益冲突案例中呈现的利益冲突更为复杂。建议由卫生专业人员和伦理学家进行对话，以便更好地了解与私营和公共部门的各种护理和组织环境有关的对患者健康和自主至关重要的关系方面。目的是为政策制定提供信息，以管理与自我转诊有关的利益冲突。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

BioethiqueOnline

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

8 weeks

期刊介绍： The Canadian Journal of Bioethics is a peer-reviewed, bilingual (French and English), international, open access academic journal that publishes theoretical, conceptual and empirical research in bioethics. The aim of the journal is to provide a space for the publication of high quality and thought provoking bioethics scholarship of diverse forms (e.g., articles, commentaries, book reviews, editorials, debate pieces, case studies) and from across the full range of specialties in the field (e.g., clinical ethics, research ethics, public health ethics, technology ethics, professional ethics). The journal welcomes submissions that might not otherwise be publishable in US or European bioethics journals because of the language (e.g., in French), jurisdictional context (e.g., specific national issues or cases), form or subject matter (e.g., using diverse theoretical frameworks or applying novel methods).