Theatre and Performance Design: A Reader in Scenography

IF 0.1 4区 艺术学 0 THEATER
P. Monaghan
{"title":"Theatre and Performance Design: A Reader in Scenography","authors":"P. Monaghan","doi":"10.5860/choice.48-1987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"JANE COLLINS ANI ANIIEW NISIET |EIS|, THEAT?? AHB PEREBBMAHCE BESIEH: A REABEB IH SCEHBEBAPHY (LONDON ANI NEW roil: IOITIEIGE, 20101Josef Svoboda, 'the father of modern scenography' (390), insists - in Jarka Burian, The Scenography of Josef Svoboda (Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 1971) - that 'true scenography is what happens when the curtain opens and can't be judged in any other way'. Nevertheless, in this fabulous reader Jane Collins and Andrew Nisbet have collected a fascinating range of existing and newly commissioned contributions that explore and expand our understanding of scenography in theatre and performance. The title, as the editors mention in their Introduction (1), has been carefully chosen to encompass the terms 'theatre', 'performance', 'design' and 'scenography' - practices which 'are sometimes considered discretely but more often paired when they are written or spoken about'. Moreover, 'the blurring of boundaries between these fields is one of the distinguishing features of current practice' (1). A reader of this kind has long been missing and therefore warrants celebration.It is now widely recognised that the term 'design' in relation to theatre and performance carries with it the baggage - commonly misrecognised as 'Aristotelian' - that the visual and spatial aspects of theatre are less important than words and actions. Arnold Aronson refers, elsewhere, to scenography as 'an all encompassing visual-spatial construct as well as the process of change and transformation that is an inherent part of the physical vocabulary of the stage'. For Svoboda, the term 'scenography' refers to the 'interplay of space, time movement and light on stage' - in Pamela Howard, What Is Scenography? (London: Routledge, 2002) - and Implies 'a handling of total production space, which means not only the space of the stage, but also the auditorium in terms of the demands of a given production' (in Burian). It concerns itself with architectural forms, objects and bodies in space, but also with making the invisible visible, with what exists between architecture, objects and bodies. In an extract in the reader, Svoboda quotes Paul Klee on this point: 'Instead of the phenomenon of a tree, brook or rose, we are more interested in revealing the growth, flow and blossoming which takes place within them' (391). Scenography is dramaturgically active, and might indeed be thought of as the equivalent of visual and spatial dramaturgy; see, for example, the editors' discussion of 'the scenographic' (140-2). Hence the practice and theory of scenography are discursive, and this reader is 'an invitation to enter into this discourse, to participate in this journey of enquiry' (1).The readings are divided into five parts, each of which contributes to the discourse of scenography. The sections move from broad issues of philosophy and perception, towards more specific issues of scenographic practice, and then broaden out again to the way that spectators make meaning from scenography within these various contexts. The sections recognise that this discourse involves, at least, the sub-discourses of ways of seeing, with all the cognitive, philosophical and cultural questions this involves; broad issues of space and place; the shaping of space and the visual - and aural and olfactory - field in performance by scenographers, and other theatre artists; bodies in space; and the contribution of spectators to meaning-making. Each section is introduced generally, each reading is further contextualised, and there are suggestions for further reading at the end of each essay. The editors admit that most readings throughout the book 'come from a western/Eurocentric position' (2).In Part 1, 'Looking: The Experience of Seeing', readings cover'ways of seeing across a range of different historic and cultural contexts' (5). Extracts from Bertrand Russell and Plato address the philosophical issue of distinguishing between appearance and 'reality', while John Willats, Jonathan Crary and Ernst Gombrich address the problematic relationship between representation and the object represented. …","PeriodicalId":42838,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Drama Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Drama Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.48-1987","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

JANE COLLINS ANI ANIIEW NISIET |EIS|, THEAT?? AHB PEREBBMAHCE BESIEH: A REABEB IH SCEHBEBAPHY (LONDON ANI NEW roil: IOITIEIGE, 20101Josef Svoboda, 'the father of modern scenography' (390), insists - in Jarka Burian, The Scenography of Josef Svoboda (Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 1971) - that 'true scenography is what happens when the curtain opens and can't be judged in any other way'. Nevertheless, in this fabulous reader Jane Collins and Andrew Nisbet have collected a fascinating range of existing and newly commissioned contributions that explore and expand our understanding of scenography in theatre and performance. The title, as the editors mention in their Introduction (1), has been carefully chosen to encompass the terms 'theatre', 'performance', 'design' and 'scenography' - practices which 'are sometimes considered discretely but more often paired when they are written or spoken about'. Moreover, 'the blurring of boundaries between these fields is one of the distinguishing features of current practice' (1). A reader of this kind has long been missing and therefore warrants celebration.It is now widely recognised that the term 'design' in relation to theatre and performance carries with it the baggage - commonly misrecognised as 'Aristotelian' - that the visual and spatial aspects of theatre are less important than words and actions. Arnold Aronson refers, elsewhere, to scenography as 'an all encompassing visual-spatial construct as well as the process of change and transformation that is an inherent part of the physical vocabulary of the stage'. For Svoboda, the term 'scenography' refers to the 'interplay of space, time movement and light on stage' - in Pamela Howard, What Is Scenography? (London: Routledge, 2002) - and Implies 'a handling of total production space, which means not only the space of the stage, but also the auditorium in terms of the demands of a given production' (in Burian). It concerns itself with architectural forms, objects and bodies in space, but also with making the invisible visible, with what exists between architecture, objects and bodies. In an extract in the reader, Svoboda quotes Paul Klee on this point: 'Instead of the phenomenon of a tree, brook or rose, we are more interested in revealing the growth, flow and blossoming which takes place within them' (391). Scenography is dramaturgically active, and might indeed be thought of as the equivalent of visual and spatial dramaturgy; see, for example, the editors' discussion of 'the scenographic' (140-2). Hence the practice and theory of scenography are discursive, and this reader is 'an invitation to enter into this discourse, to participate in this journey of enquiry' (1).The readings are divided into five parts, each of which contributes to the discourse of scenography. The sections move from broad issues of philosophy and perception, towards more specific issues of scenographic practice, and then broaden out again to the way that spectators make meaning from scenography within these various contexts. The sections recognise that this discourse involves, at least, the sub-discourses of ways of seeing, with all the cognitive, philosophical and cultural questions this involves; broad issues of space and place; the shaping of space and the visual - and aural and olfactory - field in performance by scenographers, and other theatre artists; bodies in space; and the contribution of spectators to meaning-making. Each section is introduced generally, each reading is further contextualised, and there are suggestions for further reading at the end of each essay. The editors admit that most readings throughout the book 'come from a western/Eurocentric position' (2).In Part 1, 'Looking: The Experience of Seeing', readings cover'ways of seeing across a range of different historic and cultural contexts' (5). Extracts from Bertrand Russell and Plato address the philosophical issue of distinguishing between appearance and 'reality', while John Willats, Jonathan Crary and Ernst Gombrich address the problematic relationship between representation and the object represented. …
戏剧与表演设计:舞台设计读本
简·柯林斯:我的观点是:我的观点是:我的观点是:我的观点是:“现代舞台学之父”约瑟夫·斯沃博达(390)在Jarka Burian的《约瑟夫·斯沃博达的舞台学》(Middletown, CT:卫斯理大学出版社,1971)中坚持认为,“真正的舞台学是当幕布打开时发生的事情,不能以任何其他方式判断”。然而,在这本精彩的读物中,简·柯林斯和安德鲁·尼斯贝特收集了一系列引人入胜的现有和新委托的贡献,探索和扩展了我们对戏剧和表演中舞台设计的理解。正如编辑们在前言(1)中提到的那样,本书的标题经过精心挑选,包含了“戏剧”、“表演”、“设计”和“布景”等术语,这些术语“有时被认为是独立的,但在书面或口头上更经常是成对的”。此外,“这些领域之间界限的模糊是当前实践的显著特征之一”(1)。这种读者长期以来一直缺失,因此值得庆祝。现在人们普遍认为,与戏剧和表演相关的“设计”一词带有一种包袱——通常被误认为是“亚里士多德”——即戏剧的视觉和空间方面不如言语和动作重要。阿诺德·阿伦森(Arnold Aronson)在其他地方提到,场景设计是“一个包罗万象的视觉空间结构,以及变化和转换的过程,这是舞台物理词汇的固有部分”。对于Svoboda来说,“舞台设计”一词指的是“舞台上空间、时间运动和光线的相互作用”——在Pamela Howard的《什么是舞台设计?》(伦敦:Routledge, 2002)——并暗示“对整个生产空间的处理,这不仅意味着舞台的空间,也意味着礼堂在给定生产的需求方面”(在Burian中)。它关注的是建筑形式、物体和空间中的身体,也关注的是将不可见的变为可见,关注的是建筑、物体和身体之间存在的东西。在《读者》的摘录中,Svoboda引用了Paul Klee的话:“我们更感兴趣的是揭示它们内部的生长、流动和开花,而不是树木、小溪或玫瑰的现象。”(391)。场景学在戏剧上是活跃的,确实可以被认为是视觉和空间戏剧的等同物;例如,参见编辑对“场景”的讨论(140-2)。因此,场景学的实践和理论是话语性的,读者是“进入这个话语的邀请,参与这个探索之旅”(1)。阅读分为五个部分,每个部分都有助于场景学的话语。这些部分从哲学和感知的广泛问题转向更具体的场景实践问题,然后再次扩展到观众在这些不同背景下从场景中获得意义的方式。这些章节认识到,这个论述至少涉及到关于观看方式的子论述,以及它所涉及的所有认知、哲学和文化问题;广泛的空间和地点问题;舞台设计和其他戏剧艺术家在表演中对空间、视觉、听觉和嗅觉领域的塑造;太空中的物体;以及观众对意义形成的贡献。每个部分都有概括性的介绍,每个阅读都有进一步的语境化,每篇文章的最后都有进一步阅读的建议。编辑们承认,整本书的大部分阅读都“来自西方/欧洲中心的立场”(2)。《观看的体验》,阅读材料涵盖了“在一系列不同的历史和文化背景下观看的方式”(5)。罗素和柏拉图的摘录解决了区分表象和“现实”的哲学问题,而约翰·威拉茨、乔纳森·克拉里和恩斯特·贡布里希则解决了表征与被表征对象之间有问题的关系。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信