Genocide: A Normative Account

IF 0.7 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
S. Romaniuk
{"title":"Genocide: A Normative Account","authors":"S. Romaniuk","doi":"10.5860/choice.48-1129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Genocide: A Normative Account, by Larry May, Cambridge University Press, 2010, 296 pp., ISBN: 978-0-521-12296-2Abstract: Academics studying genocide are required, amid the exigency of predicting and preventing further instances of this crime, to extend their efforts so as to connect with policy makers, provide vital information, respond to particular instances of genocide or state-inspired genocida! campaigns, and prompt a political will to intervene at any stage in this crime. May2 starts by placing genocide studies in the normative foundation of this discipline. In this work, which stands as the fourth volume of a broader project that assesses the \"conceptual and normative underpinnings of this 'crime of crimes'\", genocide is treated as the most serious of all international crimes. May calls for additional work to be performed to include other forms and conceptualizations of genocide such as cultural genocide and ethnic cleansing. The book outlines the fundamental concepts behind the crime, its study, and the discipline, while offering a unique presentation of \"special problems of genocide\". It also considers steps that should be taken forward with the view of facilitating reconciliation. May refers to war as the final response to genocidaI situations, not the first, stating that, \"there are situations where there is not unambiguous groups of victims\". Thus, humanitarian intervention, as a viable approach to mitigating acts of genocide, is still difficult to justify.Keywords: genocide, humanitarian intervention, Rwanda massacresThe study of genocide as an exceptional academic discipline still faces scores of challenges irrespective of its attempts to build upon critical knowledge and understanding amid the exigency of predicting and preventing further instances of this crime. Consequently, academics working in this discipline are required, to an overwhelming degree, to extend their efforts well beyond the ivory tower so as to connect with policy makers in government positions, provide vital information about crimes against humanity, respond to particular instances of genocide or state-inspired genocidal campaigns, and bring about the creation of a political will to intervene at any stage in this crime. Presently, however, a rather poor track record has been displayed within the paradigm of genocide studies when it comes to prohibiting genocides on multiple levels and in all categories of intensity and scale.In order to make a rare contribution to the many debates stemming from the field of genocide studies, May starts by placing the inherent problems of this discipline within the context of its normative, moral, and international criminal law foundations. Originally conceived of as what he describes as a paper-length project, this work stands as the fourth volume of a much broader project that brilliantly and cogently assesses the \"conceptual and normative underpinnings of this 'crime of crimes'\" (p. 1). Genocide is treated as the most serious of all international crimes, yet May considers genocide no less serious than other international crimes, and calls for additional work to be performed in continuing to change and broaden the status of these studies. The ultimate aim of these efforts should be the inclusion of other forms and conceptualizations of genocide such as cultural genocide and ethnic cleansing while the list of protected groups should also be expanded so that others like gender and political groups are included.This book is comprised of thirteen concise chapters developed in order to fit neatly into categories that cleanly outline the fundamental concepts behind the crime, its study, and the discipline as engaged with actual cases. The latter section of the work offers a unique presentation of \"special problems of genocide\" that connects with some of the problems that have surfaced as a result of reasonably attempting to assuage the motivation of perpetrators of past acts. It also considers steps that should be taken forward with the view of facilitating reconciliation. …","PeriodicalId":42899,"journal":{"name":"Romanian Journal of European Affairs","volume":"15 1","pages":"86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanian Journal of European Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.48-1129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Genocide: A Normative Account, by Larry May, Cambridge University Press, 2010, 296 pp., ISBN: 978-0-521-12296-2Abstract: Academics studying genocide are required, amid the exigency of predicting and preventing further instances of this crime, to extend their efforts so as to connect with policy makers, provide vital information, respond to particular instances of genocide or state-inspired genocida! campaigns, and prompt a political will to intervene at any stage in this crime. May2 starts by placing genocide studies in the normative foundation of this discipline. In this work, which stands as the fourth volume of a broader project that assesses the "conceptual and normative underpinnings of this 'crime of crimes'", genocide is treated as the most serious of all international crimes. May calls for additional work to be performed to include other forms and conceptualizations of genocide such as cultural genocide and ethnic cleansing. The book outlines the fundamental concepts behind the crime, its study, and the discipline, while offering a unique presentation of "special problems of genocide". It also considers steps that should be taken forward with the view of facilitating reconciliation. May refers to war as the final response to genocidaI situations, not the first, stating that, "there are situations where there is not unambiguous groups of victims". Thus, humanitarian intervention, as a viable approach to mitigating acts of genocide, is still difficult to justify.Keywords: genocide, humanitarian intervention, Rwanda massacresThe study of genocide as an exceptional academic discipline still faces scores of challenges irrespective of its attempts to build upon critical knowledge and understanding amid the exigency of predicting and preventing further instances of this crime. Consequently, academics working in this discipline are required, to an overwhelming degree, to extend their efforts well beyond the ivory tower so as to connect with policy makers in government positions, provide vital information about crimes against humanity, respond to particular instances of genocide or state-inspired genocidal campaigns, and bring about the creation of a political will to intervene at any stage in this crime. Presently, however, a rather poor track record has been displayed within the paradigm of genocide studies when it comes to prohibiting genocides on multiple levels and in all categories of intensity and scale.In order to make a rare contribution to the many debates stemming from the field of genocide studies, May starts by placing the inherent problems of this discipline within the context of its normative, moral, and international criminal law foundations. Originally conceived of as what he describes as a paper-length project, this work stands as the fourth volume of a much broader project that brilliantly and cogently assesses the "conceptual and normative underpinnings of this 'crime of crimes'" (p. 1). Genocide is treated as the most serious of all international crimes, yet May considers genocide no less serious than other international crimes, and calls for additional work to be performed in continuing to change and broaden the status of these studies. The ultimate aim of these efforts should be the inclusion of other forms and conceptualizations of genocide such as cultural genocide and ethnic cleansing while the list of protected groups should also be expanded so that others like gender and political groups are included.This book is comprised of thirteen concise chapters developed in order to fit neatly into categories that cleanly outline the fundamental concepts behind the crime, its study, and the discipline as engaged with actual cases. The latter section of the work offers a unique presentation of "special problems of genocide" that connects with some of the problems that have surfaced as a result of reasonably attempting to assuage the motivation of perpetrators of past acts. It also considers steps that should be taken forward with the view of facilitating reconciliation. …
种族灭绝:一个规范的解释
摘要:在预测和防止这种罪行进一步发生的紧急情况下,研究种族灭绝的学者需要扩大他们的努力,以便与政策制定者联系,提供重要信息,对种族灭绝或国家煽动的种族灭绝的特定实例作出反应!运动,并促使政治意愿在这一罪行的任何阶段进行干预。5月2日首先将种族灭绝研究置于这一学科的规范基础上。这项工作是评估“这一‘万罪之罪’的概念和规范基础”的一个更广泛项目的第四卷。在这项工作中,种族灭绝被视为所有国际罪行中最严重的罪行。她呼吁开展更多工作,包括其他形式的种族灭绝和种族灭绝概念,如文化种族灭绝和种族清洗。这本书概述了犯罪背后的基本概念,它的研究和学科,同时提供了“种族灭绝的特殊问题”的独特呈现。它还审议了为促进和解应采取的步骤。梅认为战争是对种族灭绝局势的最后反应,而不是第一反应,他说,“有些情况下,受害者群体并不明确”。因此,人道主义干预作为一种减轻灭绝种族行为的可行办法,仍然难以证明是合理的。关键词:种族灭绝,人道主义干预,卢旺达大屠杀种族灭绝研究作为一门特殊的学术学科,尽管它试图在预测和防止这种罪行进一步发生的紧迫性中建立关键的知识和理解,但仍然面临着许多挑战。因此,从事这一学科的学者在很大程度上需要将他们的努力扩展到远远超出象牙塔的范围,以便与政府职位上的决策者建立联系,提供有关危害人类罪的重要信息,对种族灭绝或国家煽动的种族灭绝运动的特定实例作出反应,并产生在这一罪行的任何阶段进行干预的政治意愿。然而,目前在种族灭绝研究范式中,在禁止多层次和所有强度和规模类别的种族灭绝方面,显示出相当差的记录。为了对种族灭绝研究领域产生的许多争论做出罕见的贡献,梅首先将这一学科的内在问题置于其规范、道德和国际刑法基础的背景下。最初的设想是他所描述的一个论文长度的项目,这本书是一个更广泛的项目的第四卷,该项目出色而令人信服地评估了“这种‘罪中之罪’的概念和规范基础”(第1页)。种族灭绝被视为所有国际罪行中最严重的,但梅认为种族灭绝的严重程度不亚于其他国际罪行。并要求在继续改变和扩大这些研究的地位方面进行更多的工作。这些努力的最终目标应该是包括其他形式的种族灭绝和种族灭绝的概念,例如文化种族灭绝和种族清洗,同时还应扩大受保护群体的名单,以便包括性别和政治群体等其他群体。这本书由十三章简明扼要的章节组成,以便整齐地归入类别,清晰地概述了犯罪背后的基本概念,其研究,以及与实际案件有关的学科。本书的后一节以独特的方式介绍了“种族灭绝的特殊问题”,这些问题与由于合理地试图缓和过去行为肇事者的动机而出现的一些问题有关。它还审议了为促进和解应采取的步骤。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Romanian Journal of European Affairs
Romanian Journal of European Affairs INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信