Chieftaincy, the State, and Democracy: Political Legitimacy in Post-Apartheid South Africa

IF 0.3 4区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY
R. H. Davis
{"title":"Chieftaincy, the State, and Democracy: Political Legitimacy in Post-Apartheid South Africa","authors":"R. H. Davis","doi":"10.5860/choice.47-7109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chieftaincy, the State, and Democracy: Political Legitimacy in Post-Apartheid South Africa. By J. Michael Williams. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 2010. Pp. viii, 282; maps, bibliography, index, list of abbreviations. $65.00 cloth, $24.95 paper. \"One of the most vivid political reminders of the apartheid past, the institution of chieftaincy\" (p. 1), has maintained its legitimacy in a country where the ruling African National Congress (ANC) has dedicated itself since 1994 to eradicating that past. J. Michael Williams explores how the \"conflicting worldviews about the nature of authority and the right to rule\" (p. 2) between chieftaincy and the post-apartheid state have produced an inevitable struggle about political legitimacy. To understand how this struggle plays out at the local level, he focuses on three chieftaincies in KwaZulu-Natal in order to \"tell the stories of real South Africans dealing with the everyday struggles that exist in the postapartheid dispensation\" (p. 31). Utilizing \"the multiple legitimacies framework,\" he argues \"that even though both the democratic state institutions and the chieftaincy seek to exercise exclusive political control in the rural areas\" (p. 19), neither is able to dominate. Instead, the outcome is a \"syncretism of authority relations\" in which \"the different sources of legitimacy overlap\" (p. 19). Having introduced his overall argument in the Introduction, Williams uses the next six chapters to understand how and why the chieftaincy in each of his three study areas remains \"a central pillar to the local populations\" (p. 38). The second chapter, \"The Binding Together of the People,\" examines chieftaincy in historical perspective and how through the changing circumstance of colonial and apartheid rule the principle of the unity of the community through the chieftaincy persevered. This was in large part due to the chiefs and izinduna (\"headmen\") learning \"to selectively invoke particular principles and ideas in different circumstances\" (p. 79). The third chapter \"examines the national debates concerning the chieftaincy in the 1990s\" (p. 80), and the official integration of the institution into the new constitutional order, which resulted in the creation of a mixed polity. With the passage of the Traditional Leadership and Governance Framework Act (TLGF Act) in 2003, the ANC seemingly came to recognize \"the unique qualities of the chieftaincy and that it indeed occupies a space distinct from the state or civil society\" (p. 106). The next chapters focus on the local level to gain insight into how the TLGF Act was largely reactive to events unfolding from the early 1990s. …","PeriodicalId":45676,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AFRICAN HISTORICAL STUDIES","volume":"44 1","pages":"141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"45","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AFRICAN HISTORICAL STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.47-7109","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 45

Abstract

Chieftaincy, the State, and Democracy: Political Legitimacy in Post-Apartheid South Africa. By J. Michael Williams. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 2010. Pp. viii, 282; maps, bibliography, index, list of abbreviations. $65.00 cloth, $24.95 paper. "One of the most vivid political reminders of the apartheid past, the institution of chieftaincy" (p. 1), has maintained its legitimacy in a country where the ruling African National Congress (ANC) has dedicated itself since 1994 to eradicating that past. J. Michael Williams explores how the "conflicting worldviews about the nature of authority and the right to rule" (p. 2) between chieftaincy and the post-apartheid state have produced an inevitable struggle about political legitimacy. To understand how this struggle plays out at the local level, he focuses on three chieftaincies in KwaZulu-Natal in order to "tell the stories of real South Africans dealing with the everyday struggles that exist in the postapartheid dispensation" (p. 31). Utilizing "the multiple legitimacies framework," he argues "that even though both the democratic state institutions and the chieftaincy seek to exercise exclusive political control in the rural areas" (p. 19), neither is able to dominate. Instead, the outcome is a "syncretism of authority relations" in which "the different sources of legitimacy overlap" (p. 19). Having introduced his overall argument in the Introduction, Williams uses the next six chapters to understand how and why the chieftaincy in each of his three study areas remains "a central pillar to the local populations" (p. 38). The second chapter, "The Binding Together of the People," examines chieftaincy in historical perspective and how through the changing circumstance of colonial and apartheid rule the principle of the unity of the community through the chieftaincy persevered. This was in large part due to the chiefs and izinduna ("headmen") learning "to selectively invoke particular principles and ideas in different circumstances" (p. 79). The third chapter "examines the national debates concerning the chieftaincy in the 1990s" (p. 80), and the official integration of the institution into the new constitutional order, which resulted in the creation of a mixed polity. With the passage of the Traditional Leadership and Governance Framework Act (TLGF Act) in 2003, the ANC seemingly came to recognize "the unique qualities of the chieftaincy and that it indeed occupies a space distinct from the state or civil society" (p. 106). The next chapters focus on the local level to gain insight into how the TLGF Act was largely reactive to events unfolding from the early 1990s. …
酋长、国家与民主:后种族隔离时代南非的政治合法性
酋长、国家与民主:后种族隔离时代南非的政治合法性。迈克尔·威廉姆斯著。布卢明顿和印第安纳波利斯:印第安纳大学出版社,2010。第8页,282页;地图,参考书目,索引,缩略语列表。布65.00美元,纸24.95美元。“酋长制度是过去种族隔离最生动的政治提醒之一”(第1页),在执政的非洲人国民大会(ANC)自1994年以来一直致力于根除这一过去的国家保持其合法性。j·迈克尔·威廉姆斯探讨了酋长制度和后种族隔离国家之间“关于权威和统治权利的本质的相互冲突的世界观”(第2页)如何产生了一场关于政治合法性的不可避免的斗争。为了理解这种斗争是如何在地方层面上展开的,他把重点放在了夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省的三个酋长辖区上,以“讲述南非人如何处理在后种族隔离制度下存在的日常斗争的真实故事”(第31页)。利用“多重合法性框架”,他认为“尽管民主国家机构和酋长都试图在农村地区行使排他性的政治控制”(第19页),但两者都无法占主导地位。相反,其结果是“权威关系的融合”,其中“合法性的不同来源重叠”(第19页)。在引言中介绍了他的总体论点后,威廉姆斯用接下来的六章来理解他的三个研究领域中的酋长如何以及为什么仍然是“当地人口的中心支柱”(第38页)。第二章“人民的团结”从历史的角度考察了酋长制,以及酋长制如何在不断变化的殖民和种族隔离统治环境中坚持了社区团结的原则。这在很大程度上是由于酋长和izinduna(“首领”)学会了“在不同情况下有选择地援引特定的原则和思想”(第79页)。第三章“考察了1990年代关于酋长制的全国辩论”(第80页),以及将酋长制正式纳入新的宪法秩序,从而导致了混合政体的建立。随着2003年《传统领导与治理框架法》(TLGF Act)的通过,非国大似乎开始认识到“酋长的独特品质,它确实占据了与国家或公民社会不同的空间”(第106页)。接下来的章节将重点放在地方层面,以深入了解TLGF法案在很大程度上是如何应对20世纪90年代初发生的事件的。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The International Journal of African Historical Studies (IJAHS) is devoted to the study of the African past. Norman Bennett was the founder and guiding force behind the journal’s growth from its first incarnation at Boston University as African Historical Studies in 1968. He remained its editor for more than thirty years. The title was expanded to the International Journal of African Historical Studies in 1972, when Africana Publishers Holmes and Meier took over publication and distribution for the next decade. Beginning in 1982, the African Studies Center once again assumed full responsibility for production and distribution. Jean Hay served as the journal’s production editor from 1979 to 1995, and editor from 1998 to her retirement in 2005. Michael DiBlasi is the current editor, and James McCann and Diana Wylie are associate editors of the journal. Members of the editorial board include: Emmanuel Akyeampong, Peter Alegi, Misty Bastian, Sara Berry, Barbara Cooper, Marc Epprecht, Lidwien Kapteijns, Meredith McKittrick, Pashington Obang, David Schoenbrun, Heather Sharkey, Ann B. Stahl, John Thornton, and Rudolph Ware III. The journal publishes three issues each year (April, August, and December). Articles, notes, and documents submitted to the journal should be based on original research and framed in terms of historical analysis. Contributions in archaeology, history, anthropology, historical ecology, political science, political ecology, and economic history are welcome. Articles that highlight European administrators, settlers, or colonial policies should be submitted elsewhere, unless they deal substantially with interactions with (or the affects on) African societies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信