Understanding Education. A Sociological Perspective

IF 0.4 4区 社会学 Q4 SOCIOLOGY
M. Zahorska
{"title":"Understanding Education. A Sociological Perspective","authors":"M. Zahorska","doi":"10.5860/choice.47-6388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sharon Gewirtz, Alan Cribb, Understanding Education. A Sociological Perspective, Cambridge: Polity Press UK; Maiden: Polity Press, USA, 2009, pp. 240.Keywords: education, sociology of education, educational knowledge.According to the authors of Understanding Education,the sociology of education has made a very important contribution to the understanding of social and educational values and how they are produced, allocated and experienced. In other words, sociology has both descriptive/explanatory and normative agenda (emphasis by MZ). (p. vi)This excerpt contains the authors' credo around which they structured their book and its contents. Their intention was to introduce readers into the sociology of education but also to present this subdiscipline from the perspective of values. Thus, the volume does not only offer an overview of essential concepts and problems in the sociology of education but also imposes authors' vision of what this branch of sociology should stand for. The key theme in the sociology of education centres around development and balancing of educational inequalities. Therefore, it is forced to take a normative stance and to determine what is good, just or desirable. Oftentimes, it is not obvious what such an unambiguous stance should be as discussions reveal dilemmas around divergent values professed by people from various cultures and social groups, and different hierarchies of values. By analysing educational problems sociologists of education become involved into debates on practical and political solutions. Therefore, \"Sociology of education [...] is a subject full of controversy and contestation [...]\" (p. 21). Sociologists constantly have to ask about the nature of knowledge they have, their goals and social consequences. The sociology of education should be, to a very large extent, a reflexive discipline.Already in the first chapter Gewirtz and Cribb present various controversies and dilemmas faced by scholars researching education processes. They use some examples to show the conflict between official knowledge transmitted in recognised institutions and individuals' interests and values. This chapter also uses the pattern around which the remaining sections of the book are structured. When presenting theories and directions in the sociology of education, the authors use examples from relevant studies. This is an excellent didactic approach: various theoretical issues are presented to readers through specific research questions operationalising those issues. By showing real-life situations and research dilemmas the book becomes interesting rather than fatiguing, which is often the case with many other handbook publica- tions.The book consists of two parts. Part I offers a general introduction into the sociology of education, presenting its key theorists and major concepts. Part II analyses four key themes: social reproduction, dilemmas associated with constructing curricula, identity processes and factors determining teachers' positions. The eighth chapter at the end elaborates on, and summarises, the authors' key idea: sociology of education as a reflexive discipline.Part I, which presents key strands and scholars of this branch of sociology, con- sists of two chapters. The first one outlines classic theories whereas the second one talks about modern concepts. Each consists of a brief description followed by a sum- mary of a seminal work which the authors consider representative for a particular line of inquiry. The first chapter focuses on two classic theories. It begins with struc- tural functionalism and, as an example, summarises a paper by Talcott Parsons \"The School Class as a Social System\" (1959). This is followed by a description of symbolic interactionism and a summary of Howard S. Becker's \"The teacher in the authority system of the public school\" (1953). These sample papers are used by the authors to explain essential differences between the two theories, stressing the dominant role of structure (Parsons) and the role of the actor (teacher) in creating or contesting the schooling system (Becker). …","PeriodicalId":44204,"journal":{"name":"Polish Sociological Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"48","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Sociological Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.47-6388","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 48

Abstract

Sharon Gewirtz, Alan Cribb, Understanding Education. A Sociological Perspective, Cambridge: Polity Press UK; Maiden: Polity Press, USA, 2009, pp. 240.Keywords: education, sociology of education, educational knowledge.According to the authors of Understanding Education,the sociology of education has made a very important contribution to the understanding of social and educational values and how they are produced, allocated and experienced. In other words, sociology has both descriptive/explanatory and normative agenda (emphasis by MZ). (p. vi)This excerpt contains the authors' credo around which they structured their book and its contents. Their intention was to introduce readers into the sociology of education but also to present this subdiscipline from the perspective of values. Thus, the volume does not only offer an overview of essential concepts and problems in the sociology of education but also imposes authors' vision of what this branch of sociology should stand for. The key theme in the sociology of education centres around development and balancing of educational inequalities. Therefore, it is forced to take a normative stance and to determine what is good, just or desirable. Oftentimes, it is not obvious what such an unambiguous stance should be as discussions reveal dilemmas around divergent values professed by people from various cultures and social groups, and different hierarchies of values. By analysing educational problems sociologists of education become involved into debates on practical and political solutions. Therefore, "Sociology of education [...] is a subject full of controversy and contestation [...]" (p. 21). Sociologists constantly have to ask about the nature of knowledge they have, their goals and social consequences. The sociology of education should be, to a very large extent, a reflexive discipline.Already in the first chapter Gewirtz and Cribb present various controversies and dilemmas faced by scholars researching education processes. They use some examples to show the conflict between official knowledge transmitted in recognised institutions and individuals' interests and values. This chapter also uses the pattern around which the remaining sections of the book are structured. When presenting theories and directions in the sociology of education, the authors use examples from relevant studies. This is an excellent didactic approach: various theoretical issues are presented to readers through specific research questions operationalising those issues. By showing real-life situations and research dilemmas the book becomes interesting rather than fatiguing, which is often the case with many other handbook publica- tions.The book consists of two parts. Part I offers a general introduction into the sociology of education, presenting its key theorists and major concepts. Part II analyses four key themes: social reproduction, dilemmas associated with constructing curricula, identity processes and factors determining teachers' positions. The eighth chapter at the end elaborates on, and summarises, the authors' key idea: sociology of education as a reflexive discipline.Part I, which presents key strands and scholars of this branch of sociology, con- sists of two chapters. The first one outlines classic theories whereas the second one talks about modern concepts. Each consists of a brief description followed by a sum- mary of a seminal work which the authors consider representative for a particular line of inquiry. The first chapter focuses on two classic theories. It begins with struc- tural functionalism and, as an example, summarises a paper by Talcott Parsons "The School Class as a Social System" (1959). This is followed by a description of symbolic interactionism and a summary of Howard S. Becker's "The teacher in the authority system of the public school" (1953). These sample papers are used by the authors to explain essential differences between the two theories, stressing the dominant role of structure (Parsons) and the role of the actor (teacher) in creating or contesting the schooling system (Becker). …
理解教育。社会学视角
Sharon Gewirtz, Alan Cribb,《理解教育》《社会学视角》,剑桥:英国政治出版社;少女:美国政治出版社,2009年,第240页。关键词:教育,教育社会学,教育知识。《理解教育》一书的作者认为,教育社会学对理解社会和教育价值以及它们是如何产生、分配和体验的做出了非常重要的贡献。换句话说,社会学既有描述性/解释性议程,也有规范性议程(MZ强调)。这一节选包含了作者的信条,他们围绕着这些信条组织了他们的书及其内容。他们的意图是向读者介绍教育社会学,但也从价值观的角度来呈现这一分支学科。因此,该卷不仅提供了教育社会学的基本概念和问题的概述,而且还强加了作者对社会学的这个分支应该代表什么的看法。教育社会学的主要主题是发展和平衡教育不平等。因此,它被迫采取一种规范的立场,并确定什么是好的、公正的或可取的。通常情况下,这种明确的立场应该是什么并不明显,因为讨论揭示了来自不同文化和社会群体的人所信奉的不同价值观以及不同的价值观等级所带来的困境。通过分析教育问题,教育社会学家参与到实际和政治解决方案的辩论中。因此,“教育社会学[…]是一个充满争议和争论的话题[…]](第21页)。社会学家必须不断地询问他们所拥有的知识的本质,他们的目标和社会后果。教育社会学在很大程度上应该是一门反思性的学科。在第一章中,Gewirtz和Cribb已经提出了研究教育过程的学者所面临的各种争议和困境。他们用一些例子来说明在公认的机构中传播的官方知识与个人的利益和价值观之间的冲突。本章还使用了本书其余部分的结构模式。在阐述教育社会学的理论和方向时,作者引用了相关研究中的例子。这是一种极好的教学方法:通过具体的研究问题将这些问题付诸实践,向读者呈现各种理论问题。通过展示现实生活中的情况和研究困境,这本书变得有趣而不是令人疲劳,这是许多其他手册出版物经常出现的情况。这本书由两部分组成。第一部分是对教育社会学的总体介绍,介绍了教育社会学的主要理论家和主要概念。第二部分分析了四个关键主题:社会再生产、课程建构困境、认同过程和决定教师地位的因素。第八章最后阐述并总结了作者的核心思想:教育社会学是一门反思性学科。第一部分由两章组成,介绍了这一社会学分支的主要分支和学者。第一篇概述了经典理论,而第二篇则讨论了现代概念。每一个都包括一个简短的描述,然后是一个重要工作的总结,作者认为代表了一个特定的调查线。第一章主要论述了两个经典理论。它从结构功能主义开始,作为一个例子,总结了塔尔科特·帕森斯的一篇论文“学校阶级作为一种社会系统”(1959)。接下来是对符号互动主义的描述和对霍华德·s·贝克尔(Howard S. Becker)的《公立学校权威系统中的教师》(1953)的总结。作者使用这些样本论文来解释两种理论之间的本质区别,强调结构(帕森斯)和演员(教师)在创建或竞争学校制度(贝克尔)中的主导作用。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信