Effects of Different Soil Tillage on Soil Moisture, Weed Control, Yield and Quality of Maize (Zea mays L.)

IF 0.9 4区 农林科学 Q3 AGRONOMY
E. Partal, C. V. Oltenacu, M. Paraschivu, O. Cotuna, M. Dima, E. Conțescu
{"title":"Effects of Different Soil Tillage on Soil Moisture, Weed Control, Yield and Quality of Maize (Zea mays L.)","authors":"E. Partal, C. V. Oltenacu, M. Paraschivu, O. Cotuna, M. Dima, E. Conțescu","doi":"10.59665/rar4044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study of the relationship between the crop plant and the technological measures is very important for establishing the best management to increase the yield, to preserve water in the soil and to reduce weed pressure. This article emphasizes the influence of tillage systems: conventional tillage (CT), minimum tillage (MT) and no-tillage (NT) on soil moisture, weed control and maize yield over three years (2020-2022) on a chernozem soil type at NARDI Fundulea, Romania. Determinations of soil moisture contributed to the climatic characterization of the agricultural year and supplied yearly reference data. In 2022, very low soil moisture values were recorded, being differentiated by the tillage system, leading to a minimum value of only 15.0% (517.5 m3 ha-1 ) for the CT system with spring plowing, a maximum of 19.4% (640.2 m3 ha-1 ) in the NT system and intermediate values in the MT system with 15.8% (564.9 m 3 ha-1 ) for chisel variant. The structure of the weeds present in the maize crop was 36% monocotyledonous and 64% dicotyledonous. The best weeds management does not involve their eradication, but keeping them under economic threshold using technological measures, such as soil tillage systems. Statistical analyzes showed significant effects of all soil tillage on maize yield and of their interactions with other technological measures. The three-year average results showed that the highest yields were recorded with MT (4.51 t ha-1 ), while the averages for CT and NT were lower (4.81 t ha-1 and, respectively, 3.38 t ha-1 ). The application of technological measures in accordance with the climate forecast led to an increase in the chances that maize crop will go well through the vegetation period and give high and stable yields.","PeriodicalId":49589,"journal":{"name":"Romanian Agricultural Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanian Agricultural Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59665/rar4044","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study of the relationship between the crop plant and the technological measures is very important for establishing the best management to increase the yield, to preserve water in the soil and to reduce weed pressure. This article emphasizes the influence of tillage systems: conventional tillage (CT), minimum tillage (MT) and no-tillage (NT) on soil moisture, weed control and maize yield over three years (2020-2022) on a chernozem soil type at NARDI Fundulea, Romania. Determinations of soil moisture contributed to the climatic characterization of the agricultural year and supplied yearly reference data. In 2022, very low soil moisture values were recorded, being differentiated by the tillage system, leading to a minimum value of only 15.0% (517.5 m3 ha-1 ) for the CT system with spring plowing, a maximum of 19.4% (640.2 m3 ha-1 ) in the NT system and intermediate values in the MT system with 15.8% (564.9 m 3 ha-1 ) for chisel variant. The structure of the weeds present in the maize crop was 36% monocotyledonous and 64% dicotyledonous. The best weeds management does not involve their eradication, but keeping them under economic threshold using technological measures, such as soil tillage systems. Statistical analyzes showed significant effects of all soil tillage on maize yield and of their interactions with other technological measures. The three-year average results showed that the highest yields were recorded with MT (4.51 t ha-1 ), while the averages for CT and NT were lower (4.81 t ha-1 and, respectively, 3.38 t ha-1 ). The application of technological measures in accordance with the climate forecast led to an increase in the chances that maize crop will go well through the vegetation period and give high and stable yields.
不同耕作方式对土壤水分、杂草防治及玉米产量和品质的影响
研究作物与技术措施之间的关系,对制定最佳的管理措施,提高产量,保持土壤水分,减少杂草压力具有重要意义。本文重点介绍了常规耕作(CT)、最少耕作(MT)和免耕作(NT)三种耕作制度对罗马尼亚NARDI Fundulea黑钙土类型土壤水分、杂草控制和玉米产量的影响。土壤湿度的测定有助于农业年的气候特征,并提供年度参考数据。2022年,由于耕作制度的差异,土壤湿度值非常低,春耕的CT系统最小值仅为15.0% (517.5 m3 ha-1), NT系统最大值为19.4% (640.2 m3 ha-1),而MT系统的中间值为15.8% (564.9 m3 ha-1)。玉米杂草中单子叶杂草占36%,双子叶杂草占64%。最好的杂草管理不包括根除杂草,而是通过技术措施,如土壤耕作制度,将杂草控制在经济阈值以下。统计分析表明,所有土壤耕作方式对玉米产量及其与其他技术措施的相互作用均有显著影响。3年平均结果表明,稻作产量最高,为4.51 t hm -1,而稻作和稻作产量较低,分别为4.81 t hm -1和3.38 t hm -1。根据气候预报采取技术措施,增加了玉米作物顺利度过植被期和高产稳产的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Romanian Agricultural Research
Romanian Agricultural Research 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
28.60%
发文量
2
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal ROMANIAN AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH is an “open access” one, which publishes original articles, short communications, presenting new scientific results – theoretical, experimental and technical – on plant breeding and genetics, physiology, biotechnology, mineral nutrition and plant protection, in field crops. Reviews on up-to date subjects and recent research, preferably from Eastern Europe, may also be published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信