The selection of coping strategies by university students stratified based on prior covid-19 exposure

IF 0.2 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
A. Shpakou, L. Klimatckaia, J. Bocharova, A. Dyachuk, O. Shik, Aleh Kuzniatsou
{"title":"The selection of coping strategies by university students stratified based on prior covid-19 exposure","authors":"A. Shpakou, L. Klimatckaia, J. Bocharova, A. Dyachuk, O. Shik, Aleh Kuzniatsou","doi":"10.5114/hpc.2021.112364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. The present study examined factors influencing the choice of coping strategies in response to stress caused by the pandemic. The aim of the study was the analysis of the selection of coping strategies chosen by university students stratified based on whether they had previously contracted coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Material and methods. A variant of the COPE questionnaire was used to examine the choice of coping strategies among 876 students of Krasnoyarsk (Russia) during the lockdown. Fifteen coping strategies were assessed in 27.9% students who had COVID-19 and 72.1% who did not have COVID-19, taking into account sex differences. Results. Problem-oriented and active coping strategies were common in both groups. The most common scenarios are active handling strategies (median 6.0). In both groups, respondents rarely singled out (median ≤4.0) the use of psychoactive substances, denial of the situation, and conversion to religion. Females more often than young males used concentration on emotions as a coping strategy. Females who experienced COVID-19 refuse to believe what happened, and choose to seek social support for emotional reasons. Conclusions. The risk of infection and the transmitted illness engendered coping strategies associated with active actions. Passive coping strategies were used less frequently. The tactics used to select appropriate coping strategies for those who have not been ill and who have recovered are similar, irrespective of sex.","PeriodicalId":41946,"journal":{"name":"Health Problems of Civilization","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Problems of Civilization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/hpc.2021.112364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background. The present study examined factors influencing the choice of coping strategies in response to stress caused by the pandemic. The aim of the study was the analysis of the selection of coping strategies chosen by university students stratified based on whether they had previously contracted coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Material and methods. A variant of the COPE questionnaire was used to examine the choice of coping strategies among 876 students of Krasnoyarsk (Russia) during the lockdown. Fifteen coping strategies were assessed in 27.9% students who had COVID-19 and 72.1% who did not have COVID-19, taking into account sex differences. Results. Problem-oriented and active coping strategies were common in both groups. The most common scenarios are active handling strategies (median 6.0). In both groups, respondents rarely singled out (median ≤4.0) the use of psychoactive substances, denial of the situation, and conversion to religion. Females more often than young males used concentration on emotions as a coping strategy. Females who experienced COVID-19 refuse to believe what happened, and choose to seek social support for emotional reasons. Conclusions. The risk of infection and the transmitted illness engendered coping strategies associated with active actions. Passive coping strategies were used less frequently. The tactics used to select appropriate coping strategies for those who have not been ill and who have recovered are similar, irrespective of sex.
大学生应对策略的分层选择基于先前的covid-19暴露
背景。本研究审查了影响选择应对流行病造成的压力的应对战略的因素。本研究的目的是分析大学生根据是否感染过冠状病毒(COVID-19)分层选择的应对策略的选择。材料和方法。使用COPE问卷的变体来检查克拉斯诺亚尔斯克(俄罗斯)的876名学生在封锁期间的应对策略选择。在考虑性别差异的情况下,对27.9%的COVID-19学生和72.1%的未感染COVID-19的学生评估了15种应对策略。结果。问题导向和积极应对策略在两组中都很常见。最常见的场景是主动处理策略(中值6.0)。在这两组中,受访者很少单独指出(中位数≤4.0)使用精神活性物质、否认情况和皈依宗教。与年轻男性相比,女性更多地将注意力集中在情绪上作为应对策略。经历过COVID-19的女性拒绝相信发生的事情,并出于情感原因选择寻求社会支持。结论。感染和传播疾病的风险产生了与积极行动相关的应对战略。被动应对策略的使用频率较低。不论性别,为那些未患病和已康复的人选择适当的应对策略所采用的策略是相似的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Problems of Civilization
Health Problems of Civilization HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
25.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信