Not White Enough, Not Black Enough: Racial Identity in the South African Coloured Community

IF 0.3 4区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY
Shannon M. Jackson
{"title":"Not White Enough, Not Black Enough: Racial Identity in the South African Coloured Community","authors":"Shannon M. Jackson","doi":"10.5860/choice.44-0480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Not White Enough, Not Black Enough: Racial Identity in the South African Coloured Community. By Mohamed Adhikari. Ohio University Research in International Studies, Africa Series no. 83. Athens: Ohio University Press, 2005. Pp. vii, 252. $24.00 paper. Mohamed Adhikari's most recent book explores the historical formation of the most complex and contested of identity positions in South Africa. His focus is on the political and conscious nature of Coloured identity, with particular focus on the period between Union (1910) and the era of Apartheid rule beginning in 1948. His central theme is that ambiguity has provided a stabilizing mechanism by which Coloured identity is sustained across different periods of South African history. Adhikari is offering an important and convincing challenge to those who would destabilize Coloured identity because of its racially hybrid origins, reify it for strictly racialist reasons, or deconstruct it for its nonracial political potential. The challenge is to offer insight into the capacity of an inherently unstable category to collectively cohere at the level of conscious conviction and unconscious practice. Adhikari is less interested in the unconscious domain of habituated meaning, focusing, instead, on self-making and instrumental social action. Almost all of the case studies and bodies of literature he reviews are analyzed in terms of the creative responses of political activists, intellectuals, and artists to platforms and changes in official policy and administrative structure. Adhikari succeeds in offering one of the most accessible frameworks for organizing the history behind Coloured identity to date. He does so without reducing the complexity that is the sine qua non of this category. His narrative is organized around the primary goal of assimilation and the structural constraints of a specifically Western Cape climate of political liberalism. It is the constant movement in and around the Janus-faced policies of British liberals rhetorically offering universal human rights, but practicing spatial and economic segregationism, that most notably shapes the contours of Coloured identity. The contradictions inherent in Cape liberalism keep Coloureds politically and culturally marginal as a group, all the while offering economic reward for disciplined and self-governing practice. Coloured leaders and political activists therefore compel the community to aspire to the higher goals of education, temperance, and self-restraint. They also generally compel political ideology to work within the dominant paradigm. The vigilant but thwarted pursuit of respectability is explored through several political organizations-the African Political/People's Organization (1902-mid1940s), the Teachers' League of South Africa (1913-1940), and the NonEuropean Unity Movement (1943-1963), to name a few. …","PeriodicalId":45676,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AFRICAN HISTORICAL STUDIES","volume":"39 1","pages":"537"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2006-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"167","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AFRICAN HISTORICAL STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.44-0480","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 167

Abstract

Not White Enough, Not Black Enough: Racial Identity in the South African Coloured Community. By Mohamed Adhikari. Ohio University Research in International Studies, Africa Series no. 83. Athens: Ohio University Press, 2005. Pp. vii, 252. $24.00 paper. Mohamed Adhikari's most recent book explores the historical formation of the most complex and contested of identity positions in South Africa. His focus is on the political and conscious nature of Coloured identity, with particular focus on the period between Union (1910) and the era of Apartheid rule beginning in 1948. His central theme is that ambiguity has provided a stabilizing mechanism by which Coloured identity is sustained across different periods of South African history. Adhikari is offering an important and convincing challenge to those who would destabilize Coloured identity because of its racially hybrid origins, reify it for strictly racialist reasons, or deconstruct it for its nonracial political potential. The challenge is to offer insight into the capacity of an inherently unstable category to collectively cohere at the level of conscious conviction and unconscious practice. Adhikari is less interested in the unconscious domain of habituated meaning, focusing, instead, on self-making and instrumental social action. Almost all of the case studies and bodies of literature he reviews are analyzed in terms of the creative responses of political activists, intellectuals, and artists to platforms and changes in official policy and administrative structure. Adhikari succeeds in offering one of the most accessible frameworks for organizing the history behind Coloured identity to date. He does so without reducing the complexity that is the sine qua non of this category. His narrative is organized around the primary goal of assimilation and the structural constraints of a specifically Western Cape climate of political liberalism. It is the constant movement in and around the Janus-faced policies of British liberals rhetorically offering universal human rights, but practicing spatial and economic segregationism, that most notably shapes the contours of Coloured identity. The contradictions inherent in Cape liberalism keep Coloureds politically and culturally marginal as a group, all the while offering economic reward for disciplined and self-governing practice. Coloured leaders and political activists therefore compel the community to aspire to the higher goals of education, temperance, and self-restraint. They also generally compel political ideology to work within the dominant paradigm. The vigilant but thwarted pursuit of respectability is explored through several political organizations-the African Political/People's Organization (1902-mid1940s), the Teachers' League of South Africa (1913-1940), and the NonEuropean Unity Movement (1943-1963), to name a few. …
不够白,不够黑:南非有色人种社区的种族认同
不够白,不够黑:南非有色人种社区的种族认同。作者:Mohamed Adhikari。俄亥俄大学国际研究,非洲系列,第1期。83. 雅典:俄亥俄大学出版社,2005。第七页,252页。24.00美元。穆罕默德·阿迪卡里(Mohamed Adhikari)的最新著作探讨了南非最复杂、最具争议的身份地位的历史形成。他的研究重点是有色人种身份的政治和意识本质,尤其关注从1910年的联邦政府到1948年开始的种族隔离统治时期。他的中心主题是,模糊性提供了一种稳定机制,通过这种机制,有色人种的身份在南非历史的不同时期得以维持。对于那些因为有色人种的混血起源而动摇有色人种身份的人,那些因为严格的种族主义原因而将有色人种身份具体化的人,以及那些因为有色人种的非种族政治潜力而解构有色人种身份的人来说,Adhikari提供了一个重要而令人信服的挑战。我们面临的挑战是,如何洞察一个本质上不稳定的类别在有意识的信念和无意识的实践层面上集体凝聚的能力。Adhikari对习惯性意义的无意识领域不太感兴趣,而是专注于自我创造和工具性的社会行动。他所评论的几乎所有案例研究和文献都是根据政治活动家、知识分子和艺术家对官方政策和行政结构的平台和变化的创造性反应来分析的。Adhikari成功地提供了一个最容易理解的框架来组织有色人种身份背后的历史。他这样做并没有减少复杂性,而复杂性是这一类别的必要条件。他的叙述围绕着同化的主要目标和西开普省政治自由主义气候的结构限制进行组织。英国自由主义者在口头上提供普遍的人权,但在空间和经济上实行隔离主义,这种双面政策内外的不断运动,最明显地塑造了有色人种身份的轮廓。开普自由主义固有的矛盾使有色人种作为一个群体在政治和文化上处于边缘地位,同时又为纪律和自治的实践提供了经济回报。因此,有色人种领袖和政治活动家迫使社区追求教育、节制和自我约束的更高目标。它们通常也会迫使政治意识形态在主导范式内工作。几个政治组织——非洲政治/人民组织(1902- 1940年代中期)、南非教师联盟(1913-1940)和非欧洲统一运动(1943-1963)——探索了对体面的警惕但受挫的追求。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The International Journal of African Historical Studies (IJAHS) is devoted to the study of the African past. Norman Bennett was the founder and guiding force behind the journal’s growth from its first incarnation at Boston University as African Historical Studies in 1968. He remained its editor for more than thirty years. The title was expanded to the International Journal of African Historical Studies in 1972, when Africana Publishers Holmes and Meier took over publication and distribution for the next decade. Beginning in 1982, the African Studies Center once again assumed full responsibility for production and distribution. Jean Hay served as the journal’s production editor from 1979 to 1995, and editor from 1998 to her retirement in 2005. Michael DiBlasi is the current editor, and James McCann and Diana Wylie are associate editors of the journal. Members of the editorial board include: Emmanuel Akyeampong, Peter Alegi, Misty Bastian, Sara Berry, Barbara Cooper, Marc Epprecht, Lidwien Kapteijns, Meredith McKittrick, Pashington Obang, David Schoenbrun, Heather Sharkey, Ann B. Stahl, John Thornton, and Rudolph Ware III. The journal publishes three issues each year (April, August, and December). Articles, notes, and documents submitted to the journal should be based on original research and framed in terms of historical analysis. Contributions in archaeology, history, anthropology, historical ecology, political science, political ecology, and economic history are welcome. Articles that highlight European administrators, settlers, or colonial policies should be submitted elsewhere, unless they deal substantially with interactions with (or the affects on) African societies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信