Implementation of the Feed and Swaddle Technique as a Non-Pharmacological Strategy to Conduct Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Very Low Birth Weight Infants
{"title":"Implementation of the Feed and Swaddle Technique as a Non-Pharmacological Strategy to Conduct Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Very Low Birth Weight Infants","authors":"Y. Yoo, J. E. Park, M. Park, Jang Hoon Lee","doi":"10.5385/nm.2021.28.3.108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a useful tool for evaluating brain injury and maturation in preterm infants and often requires sedation to acquire images of sufficient quality. Infant sedation is often associated with adverse events, despite extreme precautions. In this study, the swaddling technique was investigated as an alternative non-pharmacological strategy to obtain brain MRIs of sufficient quality.Methods: We applied the feed and swaddle technique during routine brain MRI as a quality improvement project and compared its morbidity with that of sedation in a historic age-matched group. Seventy-nine very low birth weight infants in the neonatal intensive care unit of Ajou University Hospital (Suwon, Korea) were enrolled. Thirty-two (40.5%) infants were in the feed and swaddling group, and 47 (59.5%) were in the sedation group.Results: The morbidity associated with the cardiopulmonary system (swaddling group vs. sedation group: 53.13% [n=17] vs. 63.83% [n=30], P=0.723) and central nervous system (40.63% [n=13] vs. 29.79% [n=14], P=0.217) were not significantly different between groups. The MRI failure rate was not significantly different (swaddling group vs. sedation group: 12.5% [n=4] vs. 4.3% [n=2], P=0.174). The MRI scanning time was longer in the swaddling group than in the sedation group (76.5±20.3 minutes vs. 61.5±13.6 minutes, P=0.001). Cardiopulmonary adverse events were significantly less common in the swaddling group than in the sedation group (3.13% [n=1] vs. 34.04% [n=16], P=0.002).Conclusion: The success rate of MRI was comparable between the swaddling technique and sedation. Furthermore, despite the drawback of prolonged scan time, cardiopulmonary adverse events are fewer with swaddling than with sedative agents. Therefore, swaddling can be an alternative to sedation or anesthesia when performing neonatal MRI scans.","PeriodicalId":32945,"journal":{"name":"Neonatal Medicine","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neonatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5385/nm.2021.28.3.108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Purpose: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a useful tool for evaluating brain injury and maturation in preterm infants and often requires sedation to acquire images of sufficient quality. Infant sedation is often associated with adverse events, despite extreme precautions. In this study, the swaddling technique was investigated as an alternative non-pharmacological strategy to obtain brain MRIs of sufficient quality.Methods: We applied the feed and swaddle technique during routine brain MRI as a quality improvement project and compared its morbidity with that of sedation in a historic age-matched group. Seventy-nine very low birth weight infants in the neonatal intensive care unit of Ajou University Hospital (Suwon, Korea) were enrolled. Thirty-two (40.5%) infants were in the feed and swaddling group, and 47 (59.5%) were in the sedation group.Results: The morbidity associated with the cardiopulmonary system (swaddling group vs. sedation group: 53.13% [n=17] vs. 63.83% [n=30], P=0.723) and central nervous system (40.63% [n=13] vs. 29.79% [n=14], P=0.217) were not significantly different between groups. The MRI failure rate was not significantly different (swaddling group vs. sedation group: 12.5% [n=4] vs. 4.3% [n=2], P=0.174). The MRI scanning time was longer in the swaddling group than in the sedation group (76.5±20.3 minutes vs. 61.5±13.6 minutes, P=0.001). Cardiopulmonary adverse events were significantly less common in the swaddling group than in the sedation group (3.13% [n=1] vs. 34.04% [n=16], P=0.002).Conclusion: The success rate of MRI was comparable between the swaddling technique and sedation. Furthermore, despite the drawback of prolonged scan time, cardiopulmonary adverse events are fewer with swaddling than with sedative agents. Therefore, swaddling can be an alternative to sedation or anesthesia when performing neonatal MRI scans.
目的:磁共振成像(MRI)是评估早产儿脑损伤和成熟的有用工具,通常需要镇静才能获得足够质量的图像。尽管采取了极端的预防措施,婴儿镇静往往与不良事件有关。在这项研究中,襁褓技术被研究作为一种替代的非药物策略,以获得足够质量的脑mri。方法:作为一项质量改进项目,我们在常规脑MRI中应用饲料和襁褓技术,并将其发病率与历史年龄匹配组的镇静发生率进行比较。入选了亚洲大学医院(韩国水原)新生儿重症监护病房的79名极低出生体重婴儿。喂养襁褓组32例(40.5%),镇静组47例(59.5%)。结果:与心肺系统相关的发病率(襁褓组与镇静组:53.13% [n=17] vs. 63.83% [n=30], P=0.723)和中枢神经系统相关的发病率(40.63% [n=13] vs. 29.79% [n=14], P=0.217)组间差异无统计学意义。两组MRI失败率差异无统计学意义(襁褓组与镇静组:12.5% [n=4]对4.3% [n=2], P=0.174)。包裹组MRI扫描时间明显长于镇静组(76.5±20.3 min vs. 61.5±13.6 min, P=0.001)。襁褓组心肺不良事件发生率明显低于镇静组(3.13% [n=1] vs. 34.04% [n=16], P=0.002)。结论:包裹术与镇静术的MRI成功率相当。此外,尽管有延长扫描时间的缺点,襁褓的心肺不良事件比镇静剂少。因此,在进行新生儿MRI扫描时,襁褓可以替代镇静或麻醉。