Ouidah: The Social History of a West African Slaving "Port," 1727-1892

IF 0.3 4区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY
Scott Brunger
{"title":"Ouidah: The Social History of a West African Slaving \"Port,\" 1727-1892","authors":"Scott Brunger","doi":"10.5860/choice.43-6057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ouidah: The Social History of a West African Slaving \"Port,\" 1727-1892. By Robin Law. Athens: Ohio University Press, 2004. Pp. xi, 297; 5 maps. $49.95 cloth, $29.95 paper. Ouidah in French, Whydah in English, Fida in Dutch, and Ajuda in Portuguese originally was called Hueda, Peda, or Glehue depending on the local language. Robin Law has done careful local research integrating oral traditions and official archives from Benin, Britain, and France. Law's first chapter covers the origins of Ouidah until its conquest by the Kingdom of Dahomey in 1727. Facing competing local accounts of the founding of the town and without European documents to choose among them, Law proposes that religion may hold the key. Chapters 2 and 3 cover the Dahomian conquest. The Yovogan, \"Chief of the Whites,\" was supposed to control and tax the European forts, the local merchants, and the population. As such, he was the point of contact between the Kingdom of Dahomey and European traders. Since Law is arguing that Ouidah was not a neutral port of trade as proposed by Karl Polanyi but rather a dependency of Dahomey, the degree of control by the Yovogan was crucial. Out of thirteen officials in the first four decades, most were executed or deposed. While these punishments show that kings were attempting to assert control of their Yovogan and merchants, the incentives for Ouidah to become a neutral port of trade were very strong. Chapter 4 discusses the operation of the Atlantic slave trade. African kings had enough influence to force European powers to respect the neutrality of Ouidah, even during their wars. Though Britain outlawed the slave trade to its colonies in 1808 and France did so in 1818, the slave trade between Portuguese colonies South of the Equator and Brazil legally continued until 1839, when it was finally outlawed in Britain's treaty with Portugal. Chapter 5 shows that Francisco de Souza used his Portuguese nationality to prolong the slave trade in Ouidah. In this he had cooperation of the Yovogan. Even after Portuguese slave trading became illegal, de Souza continued it through his agents in other ports. Chapters 6 and 7 discuss the transition from slave trading to palm oil after 1840. Law argues that the palm oil trade did not interfere with the slave trade, but rather became a cover under which banned trading could continue. Slaves could be bought for easily transportable silver coins, which could then be exchanged for British manufactured goods imported for the palm oil trade. …","PeriodicalId":45676,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AFRICAN HISTORICAL STUDIES","volume":"39 1","pages":"313"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2006-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"42","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AFRICAN HISTORICAL STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.43-6057","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 42

Abstract

Ouidah: The Social History of a West African Slaving "Port," 1727-1892. By Robin Law. Athens: Ohio University Press, 2004. Pp. xi, 297; 5 maps. $49.95 cloth, $29.95 paper. Ouidah in French, Whydah in English, Fida in Dutch, and Ajuda in Portuguese originally was called Hueda, Peda, or Glehue depending on the local language. Robin Law has done careful local research integrating oral traditions and official archives from Benin, Britain, and France. Law's first chapter covers the origins of Ouidah until its conquest by the Kingdom of Dahomey in 1727. Facing competing local accounts of the founding of the town and without European documents to choose among them, Law proposes that religion may hold the key. Chapters 2 and 3 cover the Dahomian conquest. The Yovogan, "Chief of the Whites," was supposed to control and tax the European forts, the local merchants, and the population. As such, he was the point of contact between the Kingdom of Dahomey and European traders. Since Law is arguing that Ouidah was not a neutral port of trade as proposed by Karl Polanyi but rather a dependency of Dahomey, the degree of control by the Yovogan was crucial. Out of thirteen officials in the first four decades, most were executed or deposed. While these punishments show that kings were attempting to assert control of their Yovogan and merchants, the incentives for Ouidah to become a neutral port of trade were very strong. Chapter 4 discusses the operation of the Atlantic slave trade. African kings had enough influence to force European powers to respect the neutrality of Ouidah, even during their wars. Though Britain outlawed the slave trade to its colonies in 1808 and France did so in 1818, the slave trade between Portuguese colonies South of the Equator and Brazil legally continued until 1839, when it was finally outlawed in Britain's treaty with Portugal. Chapter 5 shows that Francisco de Souza used his Portuguese nationality to prolong the slave trade in Ouidah. In this he had cooperation of the Yovogan. Even after Portuguese slave trading became illegal, de Souza continued it through his agents in other ports. Chapters 6 and 7 discuss the transition from slave trading to palm oil after 1840. Law argues that the palm oil trade did not interfere with the slave trade, but rather became a cover under which banned trading could continue. Slaves could be bought for easily transportable silver coins, which could then be exchanged for British manufactured goods imported for the palm oil trade. …
乌伊达:西非奴隶“港口”的社会历史,1727-1892
乌伊达:西非奴隶“港口”的社会历史,1727-1892。罗宾·劳著。雅典:俄亥俄大学出版社,2004年。Pp. xi, 297;5地图。布49.95美元,纸29.95美元。法语中的Ouidah,英语中的Whydah,荷兰语中的Fida,葡萄牙语中的Ajuda最初根据当地语言被称为Hueda, Peda或Glehue。罗宾·劳对贝宁、英国和法国的口头传统和官方档案进行了细致的当地研究。劳的第一章涵盖了乌伊达的起源,直到1727年被达荷美王国征服。面对相互竞争的当地建立城镇的说法,没有欧洲文献可供选择,劳提出宗教可能是关键。第二章和第三章讲述了征服达荷米亚人的故事。约沃根人,“白人酋长”,应该控制欧洲堡垒、当地商人和居民,并向他们征税。因此,他是达荷美王国和欧洲商人之间的联络点。劳认为,乌伊达并不是波兰尼所说的中立贸易港,而是达荷美的附属国,因此约沃根人的控制程度至关重要。在最初四十年的十三名官员中,大多数被处决或罢免。虽然这些惩罚表明国王试图控制他们的约沃根和商人,但乌伊达成为中立贸易港口的动机非常强烈。第四章讨论了大西洋奴隶贸易的运作。非洲国王有足够的影响力迫使欧洲列强尊重乌伊达的中立性,即使在战争期间也是如此。尽管英国在1808年宣布其殖民地的奴隶贸易为非法,法国在1818年也宣布了这一禁令,但赤道以南的葡萄牙殖民地与巴西之间的奴隶贸易合法地持续到1839年,直到英国与葡萄牙签订条约才最终宣布为非法。第五章表明Francisco de Souza利用他的葡萄牙国籍延长了在Ouidah的奴隶贸易。在这方面,他得到了约沃根人的合作。即使在葡萄牙的奴隶贸易被定为非法之后,德·索萨仍通过他在其他港口的代理人继续从事奴隶贸易。第六章和第七章讨论1840年后从奴隶贸易到棕榈油贸易的转变。劳认为,棕榈油贸易并没有干扰奴隶贸易,而是成为一种掩护,使被禁止的贸易可以继续下去。奴隶可以用易于运输的银币购买,然后可以用银币兑换进口的英国制成品,用于棕榈油贸易。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The International Journal of African Historical Studies (IJAHS) is devoted to the study of the African past. Norman Bennett was the founder and guiding force behind the journal’s growth from its first incarnation at Boston University as African Historical Studies in 1968. He remained its editor for more than thirty years. The title was expanded to the International Journal of African Historical Studies in 1972, when Africana Publishers Holmes and Meier took over publication and distribution for the next decade. Beginning in 1982, the African Studies Center once again assumed full responsibility for production and distribution. Jean Hay served as the journal’s production editor from 1979 to 1995, and editor from 1998 to her retirement in 2005. Michael DiBlasi is the current editor, and James McCann and Diana Wylie are associate editors of the journal. Members of the editorial board include: Emmanuel Akyeampong, Peter Alegi, Misty Bastian, Sara Berry, Barbara Cooper, Marc Epprecht, Lidwien Kapteijns, Meredith McKittrick, Pashington Obang, David Schoenbrun, Heather Sharkey, Ann B. Stahl, John Thornton, and Rudolph Ware III. The journal publishes three issues each year (April, August, and December). Articles, notes, and documents submitted to the journal should be based on original research and framed in terms of historical analysis. Contributions in archaeology, history, anthropology, historical ecology, political science, political ecology, and economic history are welcome. Articles that highlight European administrators, settlers, or colonial policies should be submitted elsewhere, unless they deal substantially with interactions with (or the affects on) African societies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信