Validity and reliability of inertial measurement units for jump height estimations: a systematic review

Q2 Health Professions
F. Clemente, G. Badicu, Uday Hassan, Zeki Akyildiz, J. Pino-Ortega, R. Silva, Markel Rico-González
{"title":"Validity and reliability of inertial measurement units for jump height estimations: a systematic review","authors":"F. Clemente, G. Badicu, Uday Hassan, Zeki Akyildiz, J. Pino-Ortega, R. Silva, Markel Rico-González","doi":"10.5114/hm.2023.111548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Inertial measurement units (IMUs) have been extensively used for measuring human motion. One particular outcome of interest in sports is vertical jump height, which is assessed in specific performance tests or actions occurring in training or match scenarios. This systematic review aimed to (1) identify and summarize studies that have examined the validity of wearable wireless IMUs for measuring jump height and (2) identify and summarize studies that have examined the reliability of wearable wireless IMUs for measuring jump height. A systematic review of the Cochrane Library, EBSCO, PubMed, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science databases was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. From the 596 studies initially identified, 30 were fully reviewed, and their outcome measures were extracted and analysed. Among the 16 different IMU models, 15 were considered valid, with only one device not validated. Of the 7 IMUs that were tested for reliability, all were considered reliable for measuring jump height. In general, however, despite these findings, IMUs are not considered accurate enough to detect small changes in performance. Also, generalizations were not possible for athletic populations given the lack of studies with such samples. in the abstract an informative and balanced summary of what was done and what was found (item 1). State specific objectives, including any prespecified hypotheses (item 2). Give the eligibility criteria, and the sources and methods of selection of participants (item 3). For each variable of interest, give sources of data and details of methods of assessment (measurement). Describe comparability of assessment methods if there is more than one group (item 4). Explain how quantitative variables were handled in the analyses. If applicable, describe which groupings were chosen and why (item 5). Give characteristics of study participants (item 6). Summarize key results with reference to study objectives (item 7). Discuss limitations of the study, considering sources of potential bias or imprecision. Discuss both direction and magnitude of any potential bias (item 8). Give a cautious overall interpretation of results considering objectives, limitations, multiplicity of analyses, results from similar studies, and other relevant evidence (item 9). Give the source of funding and the role of the funders for the present study and, if applicable, for the original study on which the present article is based (item 10).","PeriodicalId":35354,"journal":{"name":"Human Movement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Movement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/hm.2023.111548","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Inertial measurement units (IMUs) have been extensively used for measuring human motion. One particular outcome of interest in sports is vertical jump height, which is assessed in specific performance tests or actions occurring in training or match scenarios. This systematic review aimed to (1) identify and summarize studies that have examined the validity of wearable wireless IMUs for measuring jump height and (2) identify and summarize studies that have examined the reliability of wearable wireless IMUs for measuring jump height. A systematic review of the Cochrane Library, EBSCO, PubMed, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science databases was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. From the 596 studies initially identified, 30 were fully reviewed, and their outcome measures were extracted and analysed. Among the 16 different IMU models, 15 were considered valid, with only one device not validated. Of the 7 IMUs that were tested for reliability, all were considered reliable for measuring jump height. In general, however, despite these findings, IMUs are not considered accurate enough to detect small changes in performance. Also, generalizations were not possible for athletic populations given the lack of studies with such samples. in the abstract an informative and balanced summary of what was done and what was found (item 1). State specific objectives, including any prespecified hypotheses (item 2). Give the eligibility criteria, and the sources and methods of selection of participants (item 3). For each variable of interest, give sources of data and details of methods of assessment (measurement). Describe comparability of assessment methods if there is more than one group (item 4). Explain how quantitative variables were handled in the analyses. If applicable, describe which groupings were chosen and why (item 5). Give characteristics of study participants (item 6). Summarize key results with reference to study objectives (item 7). Discuss limitations of the study, considering sources of potential bias or imprecision. Discuss both direction and magnitude of any potential bias (item 8). Give a cautious overall interpretation of results considering objectives, limitations, multiplicity of analyses, results from similar studies, and other relevant evidence (item 9). Give the source of funding and the role of the funders for the present study and, if applicable, for the original study on which the present article is based (item 10).
跳跃高度估计惯性测量单元的有效性和可靠性:系统综述
惯性测量单元(imu)被广泛用于测量人体运动。对运动感兴趣的一个特定结果是垂直跳跃高度,这是在特定的性能测试或训练或比赛场景中发生的动作中评估的。本系统综述旨在(1)识别和总结验证可穿戴无线imu测量跳高有效性的研究;(2)识别和总结验证可穿戴无线imu测量跳高可靠性的研究。根据系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目,对Cochrane图书馆、EBSCO、PubMed、SPORTDiscus和Web of Science数据库进行了系统评价。从最初确定的596项研究中,对30项进行了全面审查,并提取和分析了它们的结果指标。在16种不同的IMU型号中,15种被认为是有效的,只有一种设备未被验证。在对7个imu进行可靠性测试中,所有imu都被认为可以可靠地测量跳跃高度。然而,总的来说,尽管有这些发现,imu被认为不够精确,无法检测到性能的微小变化。此外,由于缺乏对这类样本的研究,对运动人群进行概括是不可能的。在摘要中,对所做的工作和发现的内容进行翔实和平衡的总结(第1项)。说明具体目标,包括任何预先指定的假设(第2项)。给出资格标准,以及选择参与者的来源和方法(第3项)。对于每个感兴趣的变量,给出数据来源和评估(测量)方法的细节。如果有多于一组,请描述评估方法的可比性(第4项)。解释在分析中如何处理定量变量。如果适用,描述选择的分组和原因(第5项)。给出研究参与者的特征(第6项)。根据研究目标总结关键结果(第7项)。讨论研究的局限性,考虑潜在偏差或不精确的来源。讨论任何潜在偏倚的方向和程度(第8项)。考虑到目标、局限性、分析的多样性、类似研究的结果和其他相关证据,对结果进行谨慎的总体解释(第9项)。给出本研究的资金来源和资助者的作用,如果适用的话,也包括本文所依据的原始研究(第10项)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Movement
Human Movement Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信