Serve efficiency development in women’s vs. men’s professional tennis

Q2 Health Professions
Ralph Grambow, Philipp Born, Craig O’Shannessy, Jonas Breuer, D. Meffert, T. Vogt
{"title":"Serve efficiency development in women’s vs. men’s professional tennis","authors":"Ralph Grambow, Philipp Born, Craig O’Shannessy, Jonas Breuer, D. Meffert, T. Vogt","doi":"10.5114/hm.2022.109071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose. The purpose was to identify possible gender-specific differences in long-term serve efficiency development in professional women’s and men’s tennis. Methods. The analyses focused on 2 approaches: (1) total tournament comparison and (2) 2 nd tournament week vs. 1 st tournament week comparison. The data include all single matches at the Wimbledon Championship between 2002 and 2015 (ladies: n = 1771, gentlemen: n = 1772). Results. The findings showed significant development differences in favour of elite men over elite women in both comparisons. regarding the total tournament comparison, men’s development of 2 nd serve points won ( p < 0.001; r = 0.86), 1 st serves in ( p < 0.05; r = 0.72), and double fault ( p < 0.001; r = 0.85) percentages improved significantly more. As per the 2 nd tournament week vs. 1 st tournament week comparison, men’s development of 2 nd serve points won ( p < 0.05; r = 0.68) and double fault ( p < 0.01; r = 0.86) percentages improved significantly more. Conclusions. The study revealed serve efficiency development advantages for men over women in both comparisons, especially regarding the quality of the 2 nd serve, whereas no development advantages in favour of women over men could be observed in any analysed parameter, indicating possible needs to adapt elite women’s coaching.","PeriodicalId":35354,"journal":{"name":"Human Movement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Movement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/hm.2022.109071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose was to identify possible gender-specific differences in long-term serve efficiency development in professional women’s and men’s tennis. Methods. The analyses focused on 2 approaches: (1) total tournament comparison and (2) 2 nd tournament week vs. 1 st tournament week comparison. The data include all single matches at the Wimbledon Championship between 2002 and 2015 (ladies: n = 1771, gentlemen: n = 1772). Results. The findings showed significant development differences in favour of elite men over elite women in both comparisons. regarding the total tournament comparison, men’s development of 2 nd serve points won ( p < 0.001; r = 0.86), 1 st serves in ( p < 0.05; r = 0.72), and double fault ( p < 0.001; r = 0.85) percentages improved significantly more. As per the 2 nd tournament week vs. 1 st tournament week comparison, men’s development of 2 nd serve points won ( p < 0.05; r = 0.68) and double fault ( p < 0.01; r = 0.86) percentages improved significantly more. Conclusions. The study revealed serve efficiency development advantages for men over women in both comparisons, especially regarding the quality of the 2 nd serve, whereas no development advantages in favour of women over men could be observed in any analysed parameter, indicating possible needs to adapt elite women’s coaching.
女子职业网球与男子职业网球发球效率的发展
目的。目的是确定职业女子和男子网球在长期发球效率发展方面可能存在的性别差异。方法。分析主要集中在两种方法上:(1)总锦标赛比较;(2)第2个锦标赛周与第1个锦标赛周的比较。数据包括2002年至2015年间温布尔登锦标赛的所有单打比赛(女性:n = 1771,男性:n = 1772)。结果。研究结果显示,在两种比较中,精英男性与精英女性在发展方面存在显著差异。在总赛事比较中,男子二发球发展得分领先(p < 0.001);R = 0.86), 1份(p < 0.05;R = 0.72),双故障(p < 0.001;R = 0.85)的百分比显著提高。按第2个赛事周与第1个赛事周比较,男子第2次发球得分的发展情况(p < 0.05);R = 0.68)和双重故障(p < 0.01;R = 0.86)的百分比显著提高。结论。研究显示,在两种比较中,男性的发球效率发展优势都高于女性,特别是在第二发球的质量方面,而在任何分析参数中都没有观察到有利于女性的发展优势,这表明可能需要适应精英女子教练。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Movement
Human Movement Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信