Physiological and physical effects associated with task constraints, pitch size, and floater player participation in U-12 1 × 1 soccer small-sided games

Q2 Health Professions
Fernando Jorge Santos, Teresa P. Figueiredo, Cátia C. Ferreira, M. Espada
{"title":"Physiological and physical effects associated with task constraints, pitch size, and floater player participation in U-12 1 × 1 soccer small-sided games","authors":"Fernando Jorge Santos, Teresa P. Figueiredo, Cátia C. Ferreira, M. Espada","doi":"10.5114/hm.2022.108316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose. The study aim was to analyse 1 × 1 small-sided games (SSGs) with and without floating players, in different pitch sizes. Methods. Ten U-12 soccer players were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 ( n = 4) performed 1 × 1 SSG and group 2 ( n = 6) performed 1 × 1 + 1 SSG. Field sizes of 5 × 10 m (SSG1), 10 × 15 m (SSG2), and 15 × 20 m (SSG3) were used, all with small goals. The studied variables were heart rate (HR), total distance, explosive distance (> 12 km/h), accelerations, decelerations, maximum sprint, player load (PL) intensity and volume. The data were collected through WIMU PROTM and analysed with IbM SPSS Statistics. Descriptive analyses and comparisons between the effects of internal and external PL and SSG were performed with the Mann-Whitney U test. Results. Increasing the pitch size in 1 × 1 and 1 × 1 + 1 SSGs led to raised total distance, maximum sprint, and PL. In 1 × 1 and 1 × 1 + 1 SSGs, the time practice was predominantly associated with HR max intervals above 90%. Statistically sig ni ficant differences were observed between 1 × 1 and 1 × 1 + 1 SSGs in explosive distance (SSG2: 46.40 ± 5.07 / 28.99 ± 4.93, p = 0.02, ES( r ) = 0.82), PL intensity (SSG2: 2.03 ± 0.11 / 1.78 ± 0.12, p = 0.02, ES( r ) = 0.82), HR max (SSG1: 189.50 ± 1.91 / 199.50 ± 2.38, p = 0.01, ES( r ) = 0.82), and HR mean (SSG1: 174.50 ± 3.31 / 181.75 ± 2.21, p = 0.01, ES( r ) = 0.82). Floating players’ physical and physiological demands were lower compared with the other athletes. Conclusions. The pitch size influences the physiological and physical response of young soccer players in SSGs. The demand of 1 × 1 SSG is higher compared with 1 × 1 + 1. Floating player participation could result in a fruitful strategy to adjust the training intensity of specific soccer players.","PeriodicalId":35354,"journal":{"name":"Human Movement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Movement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/hm.2022.108316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose. The study aim was to analyse 1 × 1 small-sided games (SSGs) with and without floating players, in different pitch sizes. Methods. Ten U-12 soccer players were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 ( n = 4) performed 1 × 1 SSG and group 2 ( n = 6) performed 1 × 1 + 1 SSG. Field sizes of 5 × 10 m (SSG1), 10 × 15 m (SSG2), and 15 × 20 m (SSG3) were used, all with small goals. The studied variables were heart rate (HR), total distance, explosive distance (> 12 km/h), accelerations, decelerations, maximum sprint, player load (PL) intensity and volume. The data were collected through WIMU PROTM and analysed with IbM SPSS Statistics. Descriptive analyses and comparisons between the effects of internal and external PL and SSG were performed with the Mann-Whitney U test. Results. Increasing the pitch size in 1 × 1 and 1 × 1 + 1 SSGs led to raised total distance, maximum sprint, and PL. In 1 × 1 and 1 × 1 + 1 SSGs, the time practice was predominantly associated with HR max intervals above 90%. Statistically sig ni ficant differences were observed between 1 × 1 and 1 × 1 + 1 SSGs in explosive distance (SSG2: 46.40 ± 5.07 / 28.99 ± 4.93, p = 0.02, ES( r ) = 0.82), PL intensity (SSG2: 2.03 ± 0.11 / 1.78 ± 0.12, p = 0.02, ES( r ) = 0.82), HR max (SSG1: 189.50 ± 1.91 / 199.50 ± 2.38, p = 0.01, ES( r ) = 0.82), and HR mean (SSG1: 174.50 ± 3.31 / 181.75 ± 2.21, p = 0.01, ES( r ) = 0.82). Floating players’ physical and physiological demands were lower compared with the other athletes. Conclusions. The pitch size influences the physiological and physical response of young soccer players in SSGs. The demand of 1 × 1 SSG is higher compared with 1 × 1 + 1. Floating player participation could result in a fruitful strategy to adjust the training intensity of specific soccer players.
U-12 1x1小型足球比赛中与任务限制、球场大小和浮动球员参与相关的生理和物理效应
目的。研究的目的是分析在不同的球场尺寸下,有和没有浮动球员的1 × 1小型比赛(ssg)。方法。10名U-12足球运动员被分为两组。组1 (n = 4)行1 × 1 SSG,组2 (n = 6)行1 × 1 + 1 SSG。场地面积分别为5 × 10 m (SSG1)、10 × 15 m (SSG2)和15 × 20 m (SSG3),均为小目标。研究变量为心率(HR)、总距离、爆炸距离(> - 12km /h)、加速、减速、最大冲刺、运动员负荷(PL)强度和体积。数据通过WIMU PROTM采集,用IbM SPSS统计软件进行分析。使用Mann-Whitney U检验对内外PL和SSG的影响进行描述性分析和比较。结果。在1 × 1和1 × 1 + 1 ssg中,增加间距大小导致总距离、最大冲刺和PL增加。在1 × 1和1 × 1 + 1 ssg中,时间练习主要与HR max间隔90%以上相关。统计团体倪ficant之间的差异观察1×1和1×1 + 1江源发展促进会在爆炸距离(SSG2: 46.40±5.07/28.99±4.93,p = 0.02, ES (r) = 0.82), PL强度(SSG2: 2.03±0.11/1.78±0.12,p = 0.02, ES (r) = 0.82),人力资源部马克斯(SSG1: 189.50±1.91/199.50±2.38,p = 0.01, ES (r) = 0.82),和人力资源意味着(SSG1: 174.50±3.31/181.75±2.21,p = 0.01, ES (r) = 0.82)。与其他运动员相比,流动运动员的身体和生理需求较低。结论。球场大小影响青少年足球运动员的生理和身体反应。与1 × 1 + 1相比,1 × 1 SSG的需求量更高。浮动球员参与可以产生有效的策略来调整特定足球运动员的训练强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Movement
Human Movement Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信