Low performance-related physical fitness levels are associated with clustered cardiometabolic risk score in schoolchildren: a cross-sectional study

Q2 Health Professions
Neri Filho, C. Reuter, J. Silveira, Leticia Borfe, J. Renner, H. Pohl
{"title":"Low performance-related physical fitness levels are associated with clustered cardiometabolic risk score in schoolchildren: a cross-sectional study","authors":"Neri Filho, C. Reuter, J. Silveira, Leticia Borfe, J. Renner, H. Pohl","doi":"10.5114/hm.2022.107976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose. the study aim was to verify if there were associations between performance-related physical fitness levels and the clustered cardiometabolic risk score among children and adolescents. Methods. the cross-sectional study involved 1200 (655 females) children and adolescents aged 7–17 years. Performance-related physical fitness levels (upper limb strength [ULS], lower limb strength [LLS], agility, speed, and cardiorespiratory fitness [CRF]) were evaluated and categorized as healthy or unhealthy levels. Waist circumference, systolic blood pressure, glucose, and blood lipoprotein (triglycerides, total cholesterol, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol) were measured. the clustered cardiometabolic risk score constituted the sum of internationally-derived standardized values (z-scores) for each risk factor divided by 5. Associations between performance-related physical fitness levels and the clustered cardiometabolic risk score were determined with linear regression models. Results. Participants with healthy ULS levels exhibited a less favourable clustered cardiometabolic risk score, whereas healthy levels of LLS, agility (only in girls), and CRF (only in boys) were related with a more favourable clustered cardiometabolic risk score. ULS ( : –0.091 [95% CI: –0.120; –0.062]), LLS ( : –0.272 [95% CI: –0.368; –0.177]), and CRF ( : –0.218 [95% CI: –0.324; –0.112]) were inversely associated with the clustered cardiometabolic risk score, while agility ( : 0.112 [95% CI: 0.082; 0.142]) and speed ( : 0.079 [95% CI: 0.039; 0.119]) demonstrated a positive association with the clustered cardiometabolic risk score. Conclusions. Our results emphasize the importance of following moderate-to-vigorous physical activity guidelines to better develop physical fitness levels for the maintenance of cardiometabolic health during childhood and adolescence.","PeriodicalId":35354,"journal":{"name":"Human Movement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Movement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/hm.2022.107976","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Purpose. the study aim was to verify if there were associations between performance-related physical fitness levels and the clustered cardiometabolic risk score among children and adolescents. Methods. the cross-sectional study involved 1200 (655 females) children and adolescents aged 7–17 years. Performance-related physical fitness levels (upper limb strength [ULS], lower limb strength [LLS], agility, speed, and cardiorespiratory fitness [CRF]) were evaluated and categorized as healthy or unhealthy levels. Waist circumference, systolic blood pressure, glucose, and blood lipoprotein (triglycerides, total cholesterol, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol) were measured. the clustered cardiometabolic risk score constituted the sum of internationally-derived standardized values (z-scores) for each risk factor divided by 5. Associations between performance-related physical fitness levels and the clustered cardiometabolic risk score were determined with linear regression models. Results. Participants with healthy ULS levels exhibited a less favourable clustered cardiometabolic risk score, whereas healthy levels of LLS, agility (only in girls), and CRF (only in boys) were related with a more favourable clustered cardiometabolic risk score. ULS ( : –0.091 [95% CI: –0.120; –0.062]), LLS ( : –0.272 [95% CI: –0.368; –0.177]), and CRF ( : –0.218 [95% CI: –0.324; –0.112]) were inversely associated with the clustered cardiometabolic risk score, while agility ( : 0.112 [95% CI: 0.082; 0.142]) and speed ( : 0.079 [95% CI: 0.039; 0.119]) demonstrated a positive association with the clustered cardiometabolic risk score. Conclusions. Our results emphasize the importance of following moderate-to-vigorous physical activity guidelines to better develop physical fitness levels for the maintenance of cardiometabolic health during childhood and adolescence.
低能相关体能水平与学童群集心脏代谢风险评分相关:一项横断面研究
目的。这项研究的目的是验证在儿童和青少年中,与运动表现相关的身体健康水平和聚集性心脏代谢风险评分之间是否存在关联。方法。横断面研究涉及1200名(655名女性)7-17岁的儿童和青少年。评估与表演相关的体能水平(上肢力量[ULS]、下肢力量[LLS]、敏捷性、速度和心肺健康[CRF]),并将其分类为健康或不健康水平。测量腰围、收缩压、葡萄糖和血脂(甘油三酯、总胆固醇和高密度脂蛋白胆固醇)。聚类心脏代谢风险评分由每个危险因素的国际衍生标准值(z-scores)之和除以5组成。使用线性回归模型确定与运动相关的体能水平与聚类心脏代谢风险评分之间的关系。结果。健康ULS水平的参与者表现出较不利的群集心脏代谢风险评分,而健康的LLS水平、敏捷性(仅在女孩中)和CRF(仅在男孩中)与较有利的群集心脏代谢风险评分相关。Uls (: -0.091; 95% ci: -0.120;-0.062]), LLS (: -0.272 [95% ci: -0.368;-0.177]), CRF (: -0.218 [95% CI: -0.324;-0.112])与聚集性心脏代谢风险评分呈负相关,而敏捷性(:0.112 [95% CI: 0.082;0.142])和速度(:0.079 [95% CI: 0.039;0.119])与聚集性心脏代谢风险评分呈正相关。结论。我们的研究结果强调了遵循中等到高强度体育活动指南的重要性,以更好地发展儿童和青少年时期维持心脏代谢健康的身体健康水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Movement
Human Movement Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信