A new integrated morpho- and molecular systematic classification of Cenozoic radiolarians (Class Polycystinea) – suprageneric taxonomy and logical nomenclatorial acts

IF 1.5 3区 地球科学 Q2 PALEONTOLOGY
Noritoshi Suzuki, L. O’Dogherty, J. Caulet, P. Dumitrică
{"title":"A new integrated morpho- and molecular systematic classification of Cenozoic radiolarians (Class Polycystinea) – suprageneric taxonomy and logical nomenclatorial acts","authors":"Noritoshi Suzuki, L. O’Dogherty, J. Caulet, P. Dumitrică","doi":"10.5252/geodiversitas2021v43a15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT A revised taxonomy of Cenozoic radiolarian families is of particular importance because exhaustive molecular phylogenetic analyses for Collodaria, Entactinaria, Nassellaria and Spumellaria have shown high level of confidence at family or higher taxonomic ranks. In this sense, this study presents a new comprehensive taxonomy at the family level that integrated a classification based on ribosomal taxonomic marker genes (rDNA) and classical morphological taxonomy. However, many family names commonly used in Cenozoic radiolarians (Polycystinea) are derived from genera whose type species were never illustrated at the time of the generic definition. Obviously, in the vast majority of those cases, the “Principle of Typification” regulated in the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN 1999: Art. 61) cannot be logically applied. This has contributed to a century-long misunderstanding about the validity of Cenozoic taxa (species, genera and/or family-group names) erected without any illustration or drawing of their types, in particular the huge contribution of Ernst Haeckel from samples of the Challenger expedition (1872-1876). Reexamination of Haeckel's collection definitively confirmed that all the original types series (the specimens on which Haeckel established the nominal species-group taxon) being nonextant; in other words, all name-bearing specimens (the types) are restricted to the illustrations given in Haeckel's drawings. Because “types” in taxonomy are precious things, a nominal species-group taxon lacking at all of illustration (or indication to a repository) do not ensure the recognition of the species. Following the rules and recommendations of the ICZN, these names should be excluded from all nomenclatorial and taxonomical acts. This revision presents the state of the art of all proposed family-group names (with full synonymy lists) for Cenozoic Polycystinea. The list of family-group nominal taxa and their names was inventoried from 6694 publications (89% of the whole known references on radiolarians). The references were examined in order to clarify and fix the status of family names; hence these family-group names were rigidly classified as: valid, junior synonym, nomen dubium, nomen nudum, homonym, and invalid names. A total of 372 family-group names were proposed for the Cenozoic. These consist of 94 valid family-groups, 118 junior synonym family-groups, 111 nomen dubium family-groups (mainly artificially created in a hypothetical conceptual framework), 6 junior homonym family-groups, 19 nomen nudum family-groups, as well as 24 invalid names. In addition, one nomen novum et four new families are presented. The description of 25 families have been also emended. This study also outlines the advantages of an integrated approach to taxonomy of Polycystinea by the combination of both morphological and molecular systematics. Based on molecular phylogenetic studies, the systematic classification proposed at suprageneric level is arranged as follows: a) Order Spumellaria: three Phylogenetic Molecular Lineages (PM Lineages = suborders), 13 superfamilies and 42 families; b) Order Entactinaria: one PM Lineage, five superfamilies and nine families; c) Order Nassellaria: four PM Lineages, 16 superfamilies and 37 families; d) Order Collodaria: three superfamilies and six families.","PeriodicalId":55111,"journal":{"name":"Geodiversitas","volume":"43 1","pages":"405 - 573"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geodiversitas","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5252/geodiversitas2021v43a15","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PALEONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

ABSTRACT A revised taxonomy of Cenozoic radiolarian families is of particular importance because exhaustive molecular phylogenetic analyses for Collodaria, Entactinaria, Nassellaria and Spumellaria have shown high level of confidence at family or higher taxonomic ranks. In this sense, this study presents a new comprehensive taxonomy at the family level that integrated a classification based on ribosomal taxonomic marker genes (rDNA) and classical morphological taxonomy. However, many family names commonly used in Cenozoic radiolarians (Polycystinea) are derived from genera whose type species were never illustrated at the time of the generic definition. Obviously, in the vast majority of those cases, the “Principle of Typification” regulated in the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN 1999: Art. 61) cannot be logically applied. This has contributed to a century-long misunderstanding about the validity of Cenozoic taxa (species, genera and/or family-group names) erected without any illustration or drawing of their types, in particular the huge contribution of Ernst Haeckel from samples of the Challenger expedition (1872-1876). Reexamination of Haeckel's collection definitively confirmed that all the original types series (the specimens on which Haeckel established the nominal species-group taxon) being nonextant; in other words, all name-bearing specimens (the types) are restricted to the illustrations given in Haeckel's drawings. Because “types” in taxonomy are precious things, a nominal species-group taxon lacking at all of illustration (or indication to a repository) do not ensure the recognition of the species. Following the rules and recommendations of the ICZN, these names should be excluded from all nomenclatorial and taxonomical acts. This revision presents the state of the art of all proposed family-group names (with full synonymy lists) for Cenozoic Polycystinea. The list of family-group nominal taxa and their names was inventoried from 6694 publications (89% of the whole known references on radiolarians). The references were examined in order to clarify and fix the status of family names; hence these family-group names were rigidly classified as: valid, junior synonym, nomen dubium, nomen nudum, homonym, and invalid names. A total of 372 family-group names were proposed for the Cenozoic. These consist of 94 valid family-groups, 118 junior synonym family-groups, 111 nomen dubium family-groups (mainly artificially created in a hypothetical conceptual framework), 6 junior homonym family-groups, 19 nomen nudum family-groups, as well as 24 invalid names. In addition, one nomen novum et four new families are presented. The description of 25 families have been also emended. This study also outlines the advantages of an integrated approach to taxonomy of Polycystinea by the combination of both morphological and molecular systematics. Based on molecular phylogenetic studies, the systematic classification proposed at suprageneric level is arranged as follows: a) Order Spumellaria: three Phylogenetic Molecular Lineages (PM Lineages = suborders), 13 superfamilies and 42 families; b) Order Entactinaria: one PM Lineage, five superfamilies and nine families; c) Order Nassellaria: four PM Lineages, 16 superfamilies and 37 families; d) Order Collodaria: three superfamilies and six families.
新生代放射虫(多胱氨酸纲)形态与分子系统的新分类——超属分类学与逻辑命名行为
摘要新生代放射虫科的修订分类尤其重要,因为对Collodaria、Entactinaria、Nassellaria和Spumellaria的详尽分子系统发育分析显示出在科或更高分类等级上的高可信度。从这个意义上说,本研究提出了一种新的基于核糖体分类标记基因(rDNA)和经典形态分类的科水平综合分类方法。然而,在新生代放射虫(polycystiinea)中常用的许多科名是由其类型种在属定义时从未说明过的属派生而来的。显然,在绝大多数情况下,《国际动物命名规则》(ICZN 1999:第61条)规定的“类型化原则”不能在逻辑上适用。这导致了对新生代分类群(种、属和/或科群名称)的有效性长达一个世纪的误解,这些分类群在没有任何说明或绘制其类型的情况下建立起来,特别是恩斯特·海克尔从挑战者号探险(1872-1876)的样本中做出的巨大贡献。对海克尔收藏的重新检查明确证实,所有原始类型系列(海克尔建立名义种群分类单元的标本)都不存在;换句话说,所有的命名标本(类型)都被限制在海克尔的图纸中给出的插图中。因为在分类学中“类型”是很宝贵的东西,一个没有任何例证(或对库的指示)的名义种群分类单元不能保证该物种的识别。按照国际命名委员会的规则和建议,这些名称应排除在所有命名和分类学行为之外。这一修订提出了所有拟议的科群名称(与完整的同义词表)为新生代多胱氨酸的艺术状态。对6694份文献(占已知放射虫文献总数的89%)的科群命名分类群及其名称进行了整理。审查参考资料是为了澄清和确定姓氏的地位;因此,这些科群的名字被严格地分为:有效的、低级的同义名、普通的dubium、普通的nudum、同义名和无效名。为新生代提出了372个科群名称。其中包括94个有效的科群,118个次要的同义科群,111个不知名的dubium科群(主要是在假设的概念框架中人为创造的),6个次要的同音科群,19个不知名的nuum科群,以及24个无效的名字。此外,还介绍了一个新家族和四个新家族。对25个家庭的描述也进行了修订。本研究还概述了形态系统学和分子系统学相结合的多胱氨酸分类方法的优势。基于分子系统发育研究,在超属水平上提出的系统分类如下:a)刺甲目:3个系统发育分子谱系(PM谱系=亚目),13个超科和42个科;b) Entactinaria目:1个PM谱系,5个超科,9个科;c)纳塞拉目:4个PM谱系,16个超科,37个科;d)茶花目:3个超科和6个科。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geodiversitas
Geodiversitas 地学-古生物学
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
31
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Geodiversitas is a fully electronic journal, with a continuous publication stream, devoted to varied aspects of Earth Sciences. It publishes original results particularly on systematics, phylogeny, paleobiodiversity and paleoenvironment. Thematic issues may also be published under the responsibility of a guest editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信