Aristotelismus und Petrarkismus in der Accademia Fiorentina des Cinquecento: Das Beispiel von G.B. Gellis Interpretation zu Petrarca, Canzoniere No. 78
{"title":"Aristotelismus und Petrarkismus in der Accademia Fiorentina des Cinquecento: Das Beispiel von G.B. Gellis Interpretation zu Petrarca, Canzoniere No. 78","authors":"B. Huss","doi":"10.5281/ZENODO.46041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyses the specific interrelation between Aristotelianism and Petrarchism in literary exe- gesis as it was pursued by the Accademia Fiorentina in the sixteenth century. It exemplarily concentrates on G.B. Gelli's public interpretation of Petrarch's sonnet Quando giunse a Simon l'alto concetto (Rerum vulgarium frag- menta no. 78), a text written, according to Gelli, on a philosophical basis which is to be considered as strictly Aristotelian. Gelli's philosophical exegesis is much more sophisticated and ambitious than previous interpretations of this lyrical piece of Petrarch's. When constructing an Aristotelian horizon of philosophical reference, which serves as lead text to the interpretation proper, Gelli on the whole delineates, despite some didactic simplification, a coherent picture of Aristotelian doctrine regarding the creation of natural and artificial things. As far as Pe- trarch's sonnet is concerned with the origin of works of art, Gelli's exegesis manages to stay remarkably close to the literary text. However, when in the last lines of the sonnet the speaker's strong sexual longing for his beloved Laura breaks through, Gelli is forced to abandon Aristo- telianism (which is, in his view, oriented towards an em- pirical interpretation of reality and a description of human life based on sense perception) in favour of the dogmatic and metaphysical Platonism of Marsilio Ficino's theory of love. By using Ficinian theorems, Gelli wants to ethically domesticate Petrarch's text and to avoid the risk of having Petrarch make morally precarious statements. This is con- sonant with the Medici's official politics for which norms of social and cultural decorum (as reflected in the Acad- emy's statutes) had a binding character.","PeriodicalId":37926,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Readings","volume":"1 1","pages":"28-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophical Readings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.46041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
This article analyses the specific interrelation between Aristotelianism and Petrarchism in literary exe- gesis as it was pursued by the Accademia Fiorentina in the sixteenth century. It exemplarily concentrates on G.B. Gelli's public interpretation of Petrarch's sonnet Quando giunse a Simon l'alto concetto (Rerum vulgarium frag- menta no. 78), a text written, according to Gelli, on a philosophical basis which is to be considered as strictly Aristotelian. Gelli's philosophical exegesis is much more sophisticated and ambitious than previous interpretations of this lyrical piece of Petrarch's. When constructing an Aristotelian horizon of philosophical reference, which serves as lead text to the interpretation proper, Gelli on the whole delineates, despite some didactic simplification, a coherent picture of Aristotelian doctrine regarding the creation of natural and artificial things. As far as Pe- trarch's sonnet is concerned with the origin of works of art, Gelli's exegesis manages to stay remarkably close to the literary text. However, when in the last lines of the sonnet the speaker's strong sexual longing for his beloved Laura breaks through, Gelli is forced to abandon Aristo- telianism (which is, in his view, oriented towards an em- pirical interpretation of reality and a description of human life based on sense perception) in favour of the dogmatic and metaphysical Platonism of Marsilio Ficino's theory of love. By using Ficinian theorems, Gelli wants to ethically domesticate Petrarch's text and to avoid the risk of having Petrarch make morally precarious statements. This is con- sonant with the Medici's official politics for which norms of social and cultural decorum (as reflected in the Acad- emy's statutes) had a binding character.
本文分析了16世纪佛罗伦萨学院所追求的亚里士多德主义和彼特拉克主义在文学创作中的具体相互关系。它典型地集中在G.B. Gelli对彼特拉克十四行诗“Quando giunse a Simon l’alto concetto”的公开解释上。78),根据Gelli的说法,这篇文章的哲学基础被认为是严格意义上的亚里士多德。Gelli的哲学注释比之前对彼特拉克这首抒情作品的解释更加复杂和雄心勃勃。在构建亚里士多德的哲学参照视界(作为解释的引子文本)时,尽管有一些说教式的简化,Gelli总体上描绘了亚里士多德关于自然和人工事物创造的学说的连贯图景。就佩特拉奇的十四行诗所涉及的艺术作品的起源而言,盖利的注释设法与文学文本保持非常接近。然而,当在十四行诗的最后几行,说话者对他心爱的劳拉强烈的性渴望突破时,Gelli被迫放弃阿里斯托主义(在他看来,这是一种对现实的实证解释和基于感官感知的对人类生活的描述),而倾向于马西利奥·菲西诺的教条主义和形而上学的柏拉图式的爱情理论。通过使用菲西尼定理,Gelli想要在伦理上驯化彼特拉克的文本,并避免彼特拉克做出道德上不稳定的陈述的风险。这与美第奇的官方政治是一致的,社会和文化礼仪的规范(反映在学院的章程中)具有约束力。
期刊介绍:
Philosophical Readings, a four-monthly journal, ISSN 2036-4989, features articles, discussions, translations, reviews, and bibliographical information on all philosophical disciplines. Philosophical Readings is a Open Access journal devoted to the promotion of competent and definitive contributions to philosophical knowledge. Not associated with any school or group, not the organ of any association or institution, it is interested in persistent and resolute inquiries into root questions, regardless of the writer’s affiliation. The journal welcomes also works that fall into various disciplines: religion, history, literature, law, political science, computer scnfoience, economics, and empirical sciences that deal with philosophical problems. Philosophical Readings uses a policy of blind review by at least two consultants to evaluate articles accepted for serious consideration. Philosophical Readings promotes special issues on particular topics of special relevance in the philosophical debates. Philosophical Readings occasionally has opportunities for Guest Editors for special issues of the journal. Anyone who has an idea for a special issue and would like that idea to be considered, should contact the Executive editor. Philosophical Readings publishes at least 9 original researches in a calendar year.