El "primer sistema de la libertad" y la "aniquilación de toda libertad". Objeciones de Hegel a la idea fichteana de libertad

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Klaus Vieweg
{"title":"El \"primer sistema de la libertad\" y la \"aniquilación de toda libertad\". Objeciones de Hegel a la idea fichteana de libertad","authors":"Klaus Vieweg","doi":"10.5281/ZENODO.46034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Fichtean conception of freedom, even if certainly becomes the first system that frees the human being from the chains of the sensible, does not exceed the framework of the particular, because it refers to the level of self-consciousness that is enclosed in its mere possibility. Hegel's criticism against this conception shows that the particular is precisely the annihilation of the intended freedom advocated by Fichte. The inte- gration of the particular into the universal expressed as an activity involved the true realization of modern subjective freedom identified with the expansion of spirit char- acteristic of the antiquity. A trading system with restrictive laws and a repressive state converted into a tyranny constituted an attack to the true realization of individual wishes integrated in a community.","PeriodicalId":37926,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Readings","volume":"1 1","pages":"15-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophical Readings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.46034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Fichtean conception of freedom, even if certainly becomes the first system that frees the human being from the chains of the sensible, does not exceed the framework of the particular, because it refers to the level of self-consciousness that is enclosed in its mere possibility. Hegel's criticism against this conception shows that the particular is precisely the annihilation of the intended freedom advocated by Fichte. The inte- gration of the particular into the universal expressed as an activity involved the true realization of modern subjective freedom identified with the expansion of spirit char- acteristic of the antiquity. A trading system with restrictive laws and a repressive state converted into a tyranny constituted an attack to the true realization of individual wishes integrated in a community.
“第一种自由制度”和“一切自由的毁灭”。黑格尔对费希特自由思想的反对
费希特的自由概念,即使确实成为把人从感性的枷锁中解放出来的第一个体系,也没有超出特殊的框架,因为它指的是自我意识的水平,它被封闭在它的纯粹可能性中。黑格尔对这一概念的批判表明,特殊性恰恰是对费希特所倡导的自由的毁灭。作为一种活动的特殊与普遍的结合,涉及到现代主观自由的真正实现,这与古代精神特征的扩展是一致的。一个具有限制性法律的贸易体系和一个转变为暴政的压迫性国家构成了对真正实现融入社区的个人愿望的攻击。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Philosophical Readings
Philosophical Readings Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Philosophical Readings, a four-monthly journal, ISSN 2036-4989, features articles, discussions, translations, reviews, and bibliographical information on all philosophical disciplines. Philosophical Readings is a Open Access journal devoted to the promotion of competent and definitive contributions to philosophical knowledge. Not associated with any school or group, not the organ of any association or institution, it is interested in persistent and resolute inquiries into root questions, regardless of the writer’s affiliation. The journal welcomes also works that fall into various disciplines: religion, history, literature, law, political science, computer scnfoience, economics, and empirical sciences that deal with philosophical problems. Philosophical Readings uses a policy of blind review by at least two consultants to evaluate articles accepted for serious consideration. Philosophical Readings promotes special issues on particular topics of special relevance in the philosophical debates. Philosophical Readings occasionally has opportunities for Guest Editors for special issues of the journal. Anyone who has an idea for a special issue and would like that idea to be considered, should contact the Executive editor. Philosophical Readings publishes at least 9 original researches in a calendar year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信