Local elections in the Republic of Serbia 2016 and 2020: Political consequences of lowering the electoral threshold

Nikola Perišić, Boris Kaličanin
{"title":"Local elections in the Republic of Serbia 2016 and 2020: Political consequences of lowering the electoral threshold","authors":"Nikola Perišić, Boris Kaličanin","doi":"10.5937/spm79-42701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper examines the political consequences of the change in electoral legislation through a comparative analysis of election results at the local level in 2016 and 2020. In addition to the analysis of the election results themselves, and bearing in mind the boycott of the majority of the opposition in the 2020 elections, the paper will also show a simulation of the election results of 2016 with a reduced electoral threshold of 3% in order to better understand the effect of lowering the electoral threshold, considering that at that time all relevant political parties participated in local elections. The electoral results from cities that are the seat of administrative districts (24) in the Republic of Serbia, excluding the city of Belgrade and Kosovo and Metohija, are used as a sample for the analysis. The main findings of the research show that the lowering of the electoral threshold did not increase representativeness. More precisely, the number of lists represented in local parliaments did not increase, neither in absolute nor in effective numbers. However, the impact of the boycott of the opposition parties in the 2020 election process should be taken into account. On the other hand, the analysis shows that a larger number of lists would have crossed the electoral threshold if the three-percent electoral threshold had been applied in 2016. In addition, in 2020, a smaller number of so-called \"wasted votes\" was observed. Lastly, lowering the electoral threshold did not help the citizens groups to achieve better election results in 2020.","PeriodicalId":34288,"journal":{"name":"Srpska Politicka Misao","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Srpska Politicka Misao","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/spm79-42701","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper examines the political consequences of the change in electoral legislation through a comparative analysis of election results at the local level in 2016 and 2020. In addition to the analysis of the election results themselves, and bearing in mind the boycott of the majority of the opposition in the 2020 elections, the paper will also show a simulation of the election results of 2016 with a reduced electoral threshold of 3% in order to better understand the effect of lowering the electoral threshold, considering that at that time all relevant political parties participated in local elections. The electoral results from cities that are the seat of administrative districts (24) in the Republic of Serbia, excluding the city of Belgrade and Kosovo and Metohija, are used as a sample for the analysis. The main findings of the research show that the lowering of the electoral threshold did not increase representativeness. More precisely, the number of lists represented in local parliaments did not increase, neither in absolute nor in effective numbers. However, the impact of the boycott of the opposition parties in the 2020 election process should be taken into account. On the other hand, the analysis shows that a larger number of lists would have crossed the electoral threshold if the three-percent electoral threshold had been applied in 2016. In addition, in 2020, a smaller number of so-called "wasted votes" was observed. Lastly, lowering the electoral threshold did not help the citizens groups to achieve better election results in 2020.
2016年和2020年塞尔维亚共和国地方选举:降低选举门槛的政治后果
本文通过对2016年和2020年地方选举结果的比较分析,考察了选举法变化的政治后果。除了对选举结果本身的分析,并考虑到2020年选举中大多数反对派的抵制,本文还将展示2016年选举结果的模拟,将选举门槛降低3%,以更好地了解降低选举门槛的效果,考虑到当时所有相关政党都参加了地方选举。塞尔维亚共和国24个行政区所在城市(不包括贝尔格莱德、科索沃和梅托希亚)的选举结果被用作分析样本。研究的主要结果显示,降低选举门槛并没有增加代表性。更确切地说,在地方议会中所代表的名单数目没有增加,无论是绝对数目还是实际数目都没有增加。但是,应该考虑到2020年大选过程中在野党的抵制所带来的影响。另一方面,分析认为,如果2016年采用3%的选举门槛,将会有更多的名单超过选举门槛。此外,在2020年,观察到的所谓“浪费选票”数量较少。最后,降低选举门槛并没有帮助市民团体在2020年取得更好的选举结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
92
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信