Support in the education of families at risk within the organization of civil society: The experience of users of the association MoSt

Q4 Social Sciences
Toni Maglica, Maja Ljubetić, Ante Grčić
{"title":"Support in the education of families at risk within the organization of civil society: The experience of users of the association MoSt","authors":"Toni Maglica, Maja Ljubetić, Ante Grčić","doi":"10.5937/specedreh19-27569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Some families need additional support in performing a demanding parenting role, especially families at risk who do not have suffcient capacity to adequately respond to the child's needs. The functioning of such families is infuenced by risk factors arising from the family, but also from the wider social environment. Sometimes, the support and the role of a protective factor are taken over by civil society organizations that base their interventions mainly on quality interpersonal relationships and fully and timely meet the needs of children and families at risk. Objective. This research aimed to identify and understand the factors that families at risk perceive as support and assistance. Methods. The theoretical framework of the research is Bronfenbrenner's ecological model of human development. The interview method was used to collect data from 14 participants (mothers, fathers and children), users of the MoSt association from Split. Results. The results obtained by thematic analysis provide insight into: manifest forms of behavioral problems in children in the sample, service providers to families at risk, risk factors leading to the problem, assessment of support by civil society organizations and outcomes of the intervention. Research participants particularly emphasize the feeling of support that arises from the experienced, perceived feeling of comfort, security, friendliness, recognition and acceptance, and even the feeling of \"as if you are in a family.\" Both children and parents value the values behind support, which are respect, friendship, acceptance, and polite, decent communication. Conclusion. It has been shown that the organization of civil society is a kind of \"bridge\", i.e. that it moderates and facilitates between the family and state institutions. What is visible in the testimony of the participants is the perceived availability of the organization itself, its resources, services and people, as well as the specifcity of the services provided to the family.","PeriodicalId":36810,"journal":{"name":"Specijalna Edukacija i Rehabilitacija","volume":"19 1","pages":"145-164"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Specijalna Edukacija i Rehabilitacija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/specedreh19-27569","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Some families need additional support in performing a demanding parenting role, especially families at risk who do not have suffcient capacity to adequately respond to the child's needs. The functioning of such families is infuenced by risk factors arising from the family, but also from the wider social environment. Sometimes, the support and the role of a protective factor are taken over by civil society organizations that base their interventions mainly on quality interpersonal relationships and fully and timely meet the needs of children and families at risk. Objective. This research aimed to identify and understand the factors that families at risk perceive as support and assistance. Methods. The theoretical framework of the research is Bronfenbrenner's ecological model of human development. The interview method was used to collect data from 14 participants (mothers, fathers and children), users of the MoSt association from Split. Results. The results obtained by thematic analysis provide insight into: manifest forms of behavioral problems in children in the sample, service providers to families at risk, risk factors leading to the problem, assessment of support by civil society organizations and outcomes of the intervention. Research participants particularly emphasize the feeling of support that arises from the experienced, perceived feeling of comfort, security, friendliness, recognition and acceptance, and even the feeling of "as if you are in a family." Both children and parents value the values behind support, which are respect, friendship, acceptance, and polite, decent communication. Conclusion. It has been shown that the organization of civil society is a kind of "bridge", i.e. that it moderates and facilitates between the family and state institutions. What is visible in the testimony of the participants is the perceived availability of the organization itself, its resources, services and people, as well as the specifcity of the services provided to the family.
在民间社会组织内支持对处于危险中的家庭的教育:MoSt协会用户的经验
介绍。一些家庭需要额外的支持来履行苛刻的养育角色,特别是那些没有足够能力充分满足儿童需要的处于危险中的家庭。这些家庭的运作不仅受到来自家庭的风险因素的影响,也受到更广泛的社会环境的影响。有时,保护因素的支持和作用由民间社会组织接管,这些组织的干预主要基于高质量的人际关系,并充分和及时地满足处于危险中的儿童和家庭的需要。目标。本研究旨在识别和理解处于危险中的家庭认为是支持和帮助的因素。方法。本研究的理论框架是布朗芬布伦纳的人类发展生态模型。采用访谈法收集来自斯普利特MoSt协会用户的14名参与者(母亲、父亲和孩子)的数据。结果。专题分析获得的结果有助于深入了解:样本中儿童行为问题的明显形式、风险家庭的服务提供者、导致问题的风险因素、民间社会组织支持的评估以及干预的结果。研究参与者特别强调支持的感觉,这种感觉来自于体验到的、感知到的舒适、安全、友好、认可和接受的感觉,甚至是“好像你在一个家庭里”的感觉。孩子和父母都重视支持背后的价值,即尊重、友谊、接受以及礼貌、得体的沟通。结论。研究表明,公民社会的组织是一种“桥梁”,即它在家庭和国家机构之间起到调节和促进作用。从参与者的证词中可以看出,该组织本身、其资源、服务和人员的可用性,以及向家庭提供的服务的特殊性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Specijalna Edukacija i Rehabilitacija
Specijalna Edukacija i Rehabilitacija Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信