Reverse Diagnostic Workflow to Shortlist Mers-Cov Spike Antigenic Epitopes in Dromedary Camels

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
S. El-Bahr, M. Kandeel, I. Albokhadaim, M. Al-Nazawi, H. Ahmed
{"title":"Reverse Diagnostic Workflow to Shortlist Mers-Cov Spike Antigenic Epitopes in Dromedary Camels","authors":"S. El-Bahr, M. Kandeel, I. Albokhadaim, M. Al-Nazawi, H. Ahmed","doi":"10.5958/2277-8934.2022.00016.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, we provide a comprehensive reverse diagnostic workflow, in which, the in-silico amino acid composition was employed retrogradely to shortlist the viral spike antigenic epitopes to infer diagnostics efficiency. This study was aimed to explore the analytical estimates of changes in epitope composition among MERS-CoV lineages. This can be used as a predictor of the effectiveness of rapid diagnostic testing. Therefore, MERS-CoV lineage-specific spike protein sequences were extracted, aligned and compared. In addition, the degree of sequence similarity, as well as pairwise comparison, phylogenetic relations and antigenic epitopes analysis, have been conducted. The current findings indicated that no differences were observed in length and range of epitopes for each virus among all studied lineages. Most of epitopes sequences were conserved. However, few sequences showed few single amino acid mutations. About 20% of epitopes were located at the receptor-binding domain (RBD) and 80% of these were located in the other Spike`s domains. These mutations were related to lineage 2 and 3 and not for lineage 1, 4 and 5. The number of difference among viruses accession no (ALA49781, ALA49594, ALA49440, ALA50001, ALA49935, ALA49847, ALA49825, ALA49561, ALA49374, ALA49803, ALA49660, ALA49352, ALA49671, ALA49341, AHX00711, AHY22565, AJG44124, AJG44091, ALA49429, ALA49418, ALA49902, AHY22525, AHX71946, AHE78108.1, AHI48672.1, AHI48550) was maximum of 8. No gaps were observed in the epitopes alignment. The identity of spike protein among the lineages ranged from 99.5 -100%. The study concluded that any of studied epitopes are suitable for production of rapid tests of MERS CoV in dromedary camels, particularly that produced from lineages 1, 4 and 5.","PeriodicalId":15097,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Camel Practice and Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Camel Practice and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5958/2277-8934.2022.00016.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we provide a comprehensive reverse diagnostic workflow, in which, the in-silico amino acid composition was employed retrogradely to shortlist the viral spike antigenic epitopes to infer diagnostics efficiency. This study was aimed to explore the analytical estimates of changes in epitope composition among MERS-CoV lineages. This can be used as a predictor of the effectiveness of rapid diagnostic testing. Therefore, MERS-CoV lineage-specific spike protein sequences were extracted, aligned and compared. In addition, the degree of sequence similarity, as well as pairwise comparison, phylogenetic relations and antigenic epitopes analysis, have been conducted. The current findings indicated that no differences were observed in length and range of epitopes for each virus among all studied lineages. Most of epitopes sequences were conserved. However, few sequences showed few single amino acid mutations. About 20% of epitopes were located at the receptor-binding domain (RBD) and 80% of these were located in the other Spike`s domains. These mutations were related to lineage 2 and 3 and not for lineage 1, 4 and 5. The number of difference among viruses accession no (ALA49781, ALA49594, ALA49440, ALA50001, ALA49935, ALA49847, ALA49825, ALA49561, ALA49374, ALA49803, ALA49660, ALA49352, ALA49671, ALA49341, AHX00711, AHY22565, AJG44124, AJG44091, ALA49429, ALA49418, ALA49902, AHY22525, AHX71946, AHE78108.1, AHI48672.1, AHI48550) was maximum of 8. No gaps were observed in the epitopes alignment. The identity of spike protein among the lineages ranged from 99.5 -100%. The study concluded that any of studied epitopes are suitable for production of rapid tests of MERS CoV in dromedary camels, particularly that produced from lineages 1, 4 and 5.
单峰骆驼Mers-Cov刺突抗原表位候选名单的反向诊断流程
在这项研究中,我们提供了一个全面的反向诊断工作流程,其中,利用硅氨基酸组成逆行筛选病毒刺突抗原表位,以推断诊断效率。本研究旨在探讨中东呼吸综合征冠状病毒谱系中表位组成变化的分析估计。这可以作为快速诊断测试有效性的预测指标。因此,提取MERS-CoV谱系特异性刺突蛋白序列,进行比对。此外,还进行了序列相似度、两两比较、系统发育关系和抗原表位分析。目前的研究结果表明,在所有研究谱系中,每种病毒的表位长度和范围没有差异。大多数表位序列是保守的。然而,少数序列显示很少的单氨基酸突变。约20%的表位位于受体结合域(RBD), 80%位于其他Spike 's结构域。这些突变与谱系2和3有关,而与谱系1、4和5无关。病毒编号(ALA49781、ALA49594、ALA49440、ALA50001、ALA49935、ALA49847、ALA49825、ALA49561、ALA49374、ALA49803、ALA49660、ALA49352、ALA49671、ALA49341、AHX00711、AHY22565、AJG44124、AJG44091、ALA49429、ALA49418、ALA49902、AHY22525、AHX71946、AHE78108.1、AHI48672.1、AHI48550)之间的差异最大为8个。表位比对未见间隙。刺突蛋白在世系间的同源性为99.5% ~ 100%。该研究得出的结论是,所研究的任何一个表位都适合于在单峰骆驼中生产中东呼吸综合征冠状病毒的快速检测,特别是从谱系1、4和5中产生的检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: JCPR is an exclusive journal which brings out the manuscripts based on New World and Old World camelids. This journal provided a very good platform to publish camelid literature with a view to find the missing links of research and to update the camelids practitioners and researchers with latest research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信