To: First Brazilian recommendation on physiotherapy with sensory motor stimulation in newborns and infants in the intensive care unit

Q2 Medicine
S. T. Almeida, D. S. Levy, Carla Lucchi Pagliaro, C. Silvério
{"title":"To: First Brazilian recommendation on physiotherapy with sensory motor stimulation in newborns and infants in the intensive care unit","authors":"S. T. Almeida, D. S. Levy, Carla Lucchi Pagliaro, C. Silvério","doi":"10.5935/0103-507X.20220032-en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The special article presented by Johnston et al., entitled “First Brazilian recommendation of physical therapy for sensorimotor stimulation of newborns and infants in an intensive care unit”,(1) aimed to provide guidelines for sensorimotor stimulation. However, caution should be used when analyzing and interpreting the results of the included studies and developing guidelines for the recommendations. To recommend the modalities of therapeutic massage, i.e., tactile-kinesthetic stimulation and multisensory stimulation to improve sucking, the results were aggregated for two different outcomes: weight and sucking. For a better interpretation of the results of the studies, it should be noted in tables 5S, 6S and 8S of the commented article that only in the latter, there is a a single publication that evaluated suction.(2) According to the analysis of the authors of this recommendation, the study has a moderate level of evidence, which we agree with. However, the results and conclusions should be interpreted with caution due to the limitations of the study, as noted by the authors themselves: the small sample size; the heterogeneous sample of infants with and without medical complications; and the lack of daily collection of data on sucking, which hinders the understanding of the variability of daily behaviors. All these findings limit the ability to generalize a recommendation. When analyzing the multisensory approach, this study did not control for confounding factors, thus leading to a risk of measurement bias. Therefore, there is no way to isolate the effect of multisensory stimulation as the only factor favoring the sucking performance of newborns subjected to auditory, tactile, visual and vestibular stimulation.(2) The authors of this document, which integrates and represents the 20202022 management of the Department of Dysphagia of the Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia (SBFa), also highlight the role of the speech therapist as responsible and qualified for prevention, evaluation, diagnosis, functional/functional rehabilitation and management of sucking and swallowing disorders, acting in units of low, medium and high complexity, hospitals (including neonatal intensive care units), rehabilitation centers, among others.(3) Thus, specialized literature in this area may provide more robust evidence focused on the functions of sucking, swallowing and feeding. For example, a double-blinded randomized clinical trial using an oral stimulation program (applied by speech therapists) before the first attempt at oral assessment showed promising results. The intervention group reached level 4 of oral feeding ability 8 days before the control group, and 75.7% of participants reached level 4in the first oral attempt. The control group had a lower probability of reaching 100% of the diet when compared to the intervention in the same Sheila Tamanini de Almeida1 , Deborah Salle Levy2 , Carla Lucchi Pagliaro3 , Carolina Castelli Silvério4","PeriodicalId":53519,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva","volume":"34 1","pages":"308 - 309"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/0103-507X.20220032-en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The special article presented by Johnston et al., entitled “First Brazilian recommendation of physical therapy for sensorimotor stimulation of newborns and infants in an intensive care unit”,(1) aimed to provide guidelines for sensorimotor stimulation. However, caution should be used when analyzing and interpreting the results of the included studies and developing guidelines for the recommendations. To recommend the modalities of therapeutic massage, i.e., tactile-kinesthetic stimulation and multisensory stimulation to improve sucking, the results were aggregated for two different outcomes: weight and sucking. For a better interpretation of the results of the studies, it should be noted in tables 5S, 6S and 8S of the commented article that only in the latter, there is a a single publication that evaluated suction.(2) According to the analysis of the authors of this recommendation, the study has a moderate level of evidence, which we agree with. However, the results and conclusions should be interpreted with caution due to the limitations of the study, as noted by the authors themselves: the small sample size; the heterogeneous sample of infants with and without medical complications; and the lack of daily collection of data on sucking, which hinders the understanding of the variability of daily behaviors. All these findings limit the ability to generalize a recommendation. When analyzing the multisensory approach, this study did not control for confounding factors, thus leading to a risk of measurement bias. Therefore, there is no way to isolate the effect of multisensory stimulation as the only factor favoring the sucking performance of newborns subjected to auditory, tactile, visual and vestibular stimulation.(2) The authors of this document, which integrates and represents the 20202022 management of the Department of Dysphagia of the Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia (SBFa), also highlight the role of the speech therapist as responsible and qualified for prevention, evaluation, diagnosis, functional/functional rehabilitation and management of sucking and swallowing disorders, acting in units of low, medium and high complexity, hospitals (including neonatal intensive care units), rehabilitation centers, among others.(3) Thus, specialized literature in this area may provide more robust evidence focused on the functions of sucking, swallowing and feeding. For example, a double-blinded randomized clinical trial using an oral stimulation program (applied by speech therapists) before the first attempt at oral assessment showed promising results. The intervention group reached level 4 of oral feeding ability 8 days before the control group, and 75.7% of participants reached level 4in the first oral attempt. The control group had a lower probability of reaching 100% of the diet when compared to the intervention in the same Sheila Tamanini de Almeida1 , Deborah Salle Levy2 , Carla Lucchi Pagliaro3 , Carolina Castelli Silvério4
致:巴西首个关于新生儿和重症监护病房婴儿用感觉运动刺激进行物理治疗的建议
Johnston等人发表的特别文章题为“巴西首次推荐新生儿和重症监护病房婴儿的感觉运动刺激物理疗法”,(1)旨在提供感觉运动刺激的指导方针。然而,在分析和解释纳入研究的结果以及为建议制定指导方针时,应谨慎行事。为了推荐治疗按摩的方式,即触觉-动觉刺激和多感官刺激来改善吮吸,结果汇总为两个不同的结果:体重和吮吸。为了更好的解释研究的结果,在评论文章的表5S, 6S和8S中需要注意的是,只有在评论文章中,只有一篇出版物评估了吸力。(2)根据本推荐作者的分析,该研究具有中等水平的证据,我们同意。然而,由于研究的局限性,结果和结论应谨慎解释,正如作者自己所指出的:样本量小;有和没有医学并发症的婴儿的异质样本;而且缺乏关于吸吮的日常数据收集,这阻碍了对日常行为可变性的理解。所有这些发现限制了推广建议的能力。在分析多感官方法时,本研究没有控制混杂因素,从而导致测量偏倚的风险。因此,没有办法将多感觉刺激的影响作为影响新生儿在听觉、触觉、视觉和前庭刺激下吮吸表现的唯一因素。(2)本文件的作者整合并代表了巴西听觉学会(SBFa)吞咽困难科的20202022年管理,也强调了语言治疗师在预防、评估、诊断方面的责任和资格。吮吸和吞咽障碍的功能/功能康复和管理,适用于低、中、高复杂性的单位,医院(包括新生儿重症监护病房),康复中心等。(3)因此,该领域的专业文献可能会提供更有力的证据,关注吮吸、吞咽和喂养的功能。例如,一项双盲随机临床试验在第一次尝试进行口腔评估之前使用了口腔刺激计划(由语言治疗师应用),结果显示出很好的效果。干预组比对照组早8天达到4级口服喂养能力,75.7%的参与者在第一次口腔尝试中达到4级。对照组达到100%饮食目标的可能性低于同样的实验组:希拉·塔马尼尼·德·阿尔梅达、黛博拉·萨勒·莱维、卡拉·卢奇·帕格里亚罗、卡罗莱纳·卡斯泰利·西尔维萨里
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva Medicine-Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
114
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信