{"title":"Skull Triangles: Flinders Petrie, Race Theory and Biometrics","authors":"D. Challis","doi":"10.5334/BHA-556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1902 the Egyptian archaeologist William Matthew Flinders Petrie published a graph of triangles indicating skull size, shape and ‘racial ability’. In the same year a paper on Naqada crania that had been excavated by Petrie’s team in 1894–5 was published in the anthropometric journal Biometrika , which played an important part in the methodology of cranial measuring in biometrics and helped establish Karl Pearson’s biometric laboratory at University College London. Cicely D. Fawcett’s and Alice Lee’s paper on the variation and correlation of the human skull used the Naqada crania to argue for a controlled system of measurement of skull size and shape to establish homogeneous racial groups, patterns of migration and evolutionary development. Their work was more cautious in tone and judgement than Petrie’s pronouncements on the racial origins of the early Egyptians but both the graph and the paper illustrated shared ideas about skull size, shape, statistical analysis and the ability and need to define ‘race’. This paper explores how Petrie shared his archaeological work with a broad number of people and disciplines, including statistics and biometrics, and the context for measuring and analysing skulls at the turn of the twentieth century.","PeriodicalId":41664,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the History of Archaeology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5334/BHA-556","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the History of Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/BHA-556","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
Abstract
In 1902 the Egyptian archaeologist William Matthew Flinders Petrie published a graph of triangles indicating skull size, shape and ‘racial ability’. In the same year a paper on Naqada crania that had been excavated by Petrie’s team in 1894–5 was published in the anthropometric journal Biometrika , which played an important part in the methodology of cranial measuring in biometrics and helped establish Karl Pearson’s biometric laboratory at University College London. Cicely D. Fawcett’s and Alice Lee’s paper on the variation and correlation of the human skull used the Naqada crania to argue for a controlled system of measurement of skull size and shape to establish homogeneous racial groups, patterns of migration and evolutionary development. Their work was more cautious in tone and judgement than Petrie’s pronouncements on the racial origins of the early Egyptians but both the graph and the paper illustrated shared ideas about skull size, shape, statistical analysis and the ability and need to define ‘race’. This paper explores how Petrie shared his archaeological work with a broad number of people and disciplines, including statistics and biometrics, and the context for measuring and analysing skulls at the turn of the twentieth century.
1902年,埃及考古学家威廉·马修·弗林德斯·皮特里(William Matthew Flinders Petrie)发表了一幅三角形图,显示了头骨的大小、形状和“种族能力”。同年,一篇关于那卡达头颅的论文发表在人体计量学杂志《生物计量学》上,该论文在生物计量学的颅骨测量方法中发挥了重要作用,并帮助卡尔·皮尔森在伦敦大学学院建立了生物计量实验室。Cicely D. Fawcett和Alice Lee在关于人类头骨的变异和相关性的论文中,利用那卡达头骨来论证一种测量头骨大小和形状的受控系统,以建立同质的种族群体、迁徙模式和进化发展。与皮特里关于早期埃及人种族起源的声明相比,他们的工作在语气和判断上更为谨慎,但图表和论文都阐述了关于头骨大小、形状、统计分析以及定义“种族”的能力和需要的共同观点。本文探讨了Petrie是如何与大量的人和学科分享他的考古工作的,包括统计学和生物识别学,以及在20世纪之交测量和分析头骨的背景。