Eccentric overload differences between loads and training variables on flywheel training.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Biology of Sport Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-05 DOI:10.5114/biolsport.2023.122483
Muñoz-LópezAlejandro, NakamuraFábio Yuzo, BeatoMarco
{"title":"Eccentric overload differences between loads and training variables on flywheel training.","authors":"Muñoz-LópezAlejandro, NakamuraFábio Yuzo, BeatoMarco","doi":"10.5114/biolsport.2023.122483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is considerable debate about the existence of a real eccentric overload in flywheel exercises. This study aimed to analyse the differences in concentric: eccentric mechanical output ratios between different loads and variables in the flywheel squat exercise. Twenty physically active men (22.9 ± 2.2 years, height: 1.8 ± 0.1 m, weight: 79.6 ± 8.2 kg) performed a loading test using five moments of inertia. Angular speed was measured using a rotary encoder, while the vertical force was measured using force plates. For each variable (angular speed, angular acceleration, power, vertical force, and torque), mean and peak values were calculated for concentric and eccentric phases to allow comparisons across the loads. We tested the possible differences in Load × Phase (concentric and eccentric) and Load × Variable. The level of significance was established as p < 0.05. A significant Load × Phase interaction was found in mean angular speed, peak vertical force, peak angular acceleration, peak power and peak torque. Higher eccentric overload values were observed with speed-derived variables (angular speed, angular acceleration and power). In conclusion, speed-derived peak variables and lower loads are more likely to show an eccentric overload and can be used to monitor responses to flywheel training.</p>","PeriodicalId":55365,"journal":{"name":"Biology of Sport","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10588593/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biology of Sport","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2023.122483","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is considerable debate about the existence of a real eccentric overload in flywheel exercises. This study aimed to analyse the differences in concentric: eccentric mechanical output ratios between different loads and variables in the flywheel squat exercise. Twenty physically active men (22.9 ± 2.2 years, height: 1.8 ± 0.1 m, weight: 79.6 ± 8.2 kg) performed a loading test using five moments of inertia. Angular speed was measured using a rotary encoder, while the vertical force was measured using force plates. For each variable (angular speed, angular acceleration, power, vertical force, and torque), mean and peak values were calculated for concentric and eccentric phases to allow comparisons across the loads. We tested the possible differences in Load × Phase (concentric and eccentric) and Load × Variable. The level of significance was established as p < 0.05. A significant Load × Phase interaction was found in mean angular speed, peak vertical force, peak angular acceleration, peak power and peak torque. Higher eccentric overload values were observed with speed-derived variables (angular speed, angular acceleration and power). In conclusion, speed-derived peak variables and lower loads are more likely to show an eccentric overload and can be used to monitor responses to flywheel training.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

飞轮训练中载荷与训练变量的偏心过载差异
关于飞轮运动中是否存在真正的偏心过载存在着相当大的争论。本研究旨在分析在飞轮深蹲练习中不同负荷和变量之间同心:偏心机械输出比的差异。对20名体力活动男性(22.9±2.2岁,身高1.8±0.1 m,体重79.6±8.2 kg)进行5转动惯量加载试验。角速度用旋转编码器测量,垂直力用测力板测量。对于每个变量(角速度、角加速度、功率、垂直力和扭矩),计算同心和偏心相位的平均值和峰值,以便在负载之间进行比较。我们测试了负载×相位(同心和偏心)和负载×变量可能存在的差异。p < 0.05为显著性水平。平均角速度、峰值垂直力、峰值角加速度、峰值功率和峰值扭矩均存在显著的载荷-相位交互作用。用速度衍生变量(角速度、角加速度和功率)观察到较高的偏心过载值。总之,速度衍生的峰值变量和较低负荷更有可能显示偏心过载,可用于监测飞轮训练的响应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biology of Sport
Biology of Sport 生物-运动科学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
12.50%
发文量
113
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biology of Sport is the official journal of the Institute of Sport in Warsaw, Poland, published since 1984. Biology of Sport is an international scientific peer-reviewed journal, published quarterly in both paper and electronic format. The journal publishes articles concerning basic and applied sciences in sport: sports and exercise physiology, sports immunology and medicine, sports genetics, training and testing, pharmacology, as well as in other biological aspects related to sport. Priority is given to inter-disciplinary papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信