Treatment methods of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder: Review with therapeutic implications

S. Tamás, Melinda Cserép
{"title":"Treatment methods of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder: Review with therapeutic implications","authors":"S. Tamás, Melinda Cserép","doi":"10.5937/PSIHDAN1701005D","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The introduction of Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID) have refined childhood and adolescent eating disorders, however it meant a significant change in the diagnostics. Hardly anything is known about its effective interventions and there is a lack of specific treatment guidelines. Thus, our aim was to review the risk factors, assessment methods, and chiefly the treatment methods of ARFID to support its clinical management and psychotherapy. Method: The reviewing process was conducted in two steps, with the primary focus on the literature since the introduction of ARFID using the term of ‘avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder’ with dates 2012 -2015. The PRISMA flow algorithm was applied to filter results. Results and discussion: Assessment methods involve structured DSM-V interview, supplemented with BryantWaugh’s diagnostic guideline, and the Children’s Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire, or the Eating Disturbances in Youth-Questionnaire. The heterogeneous treatment shall fit the patients’ and families individual needs, and the different presentations ARFID (e.g. sensory-based selective eating, of chocking or vomiting phobia and interactional difficulties). A combination of medical treatment with the primary focus on the weight recovery, nutritional management, and psychotherapeutic interventions are suggested; in children parents should be involved. Behavior therapy with exposure, systematic desensitization, CBT with cognitive restructuring, anxiety management, and family based interventions seemed to be the most useful psychotherapeutic interventions. Conclusions: Studies should start assessing the effectiveness of different treatment approaches based on longitudinal researches to describe strict evidence-based guidelines for each presentations of ARFID.","PeriodicalId":31896,"journal":{"name":"Psihijatrija Danas","volume":"49 1","pages":"5-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psihijatrija Danas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/PSIHDAN1701005D","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The introduction of Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID) have refined childhood and adolescent eating disorders, however it meant a significant change in the diagnostics. Hardly anything is known about its effective interventions and there is a lack of specific treatment guidelines. Thus, our aim was to review the risk factors, assessment methods, and chiefly the treatment methods of ARFID to support its clinical management and psychotherapy. Method: The reviewing process was conducted in two steps, with the primary focus on the literature since the introduction of ARFID using the term of ‘avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder’ with dates 2012 -2015. The PRISMA flow algorithm was applied to filter results. Results and discussion: Assessment methods involve structured DSM-V interview, supplemented with BryantWaugh’s diagnostic guideline, and the Children’s Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire, or the Eating Disturbances in Youth-Questionnaire. The heterogeneous treatment shall fit the patients’ and families individual needs, and the different presentations ARFID (e.g. sensory-based selective eating, of chocking or vomiting phobia and interactional difficulties). A combination of medical treatment with the primary focus on the weight recovery, nutritional management, and psychotherapeutic interventions are suggested; in children parents should be involved. Behavior therapy with exposure, systematic desensitization, CBT with cognitive restructuring, anxiety management, and family based interventions seemed to be the most useful psychotherapeutic interventions. Conclusions: Studies should start assessing the effectiveness of different treatment approaches based on longitudinal researches to describe strict evidence-based guidelines for each presentations of ARFID.
回避/限制性食物摄入障碍的治疗方法:回顾与治疗意义
背景:回避/限制性食物摄入障碍(ARFID)的引入改善了儿童和青少年的饮食失调,但这意味着诊断的重大变化。对其有效的干预措施几乎一无所知,而且缺乏具体的治疗指南。因此,我们的目的是回顾ARFID的危险因素,评估方法,主要是治疗方法,以支持其临床管理和心理治疗。方法:回顾过程分两个步骤进行,主要关注自ARFID引入以来的文献,使用术语“回避/限制性食物摄入障碍”,时间为2012 -2015年。采用PRISMA flow算法对滤波结果进行处理。结果和讨论:评估方法包括结构化的DSM-V访谈,辅以BryantWaugh的诊断指南,以及儿童饮食失调检查问卷,或青少年饮食失调问卷。异质治疗应符合患者和家庭的个体需求,以及ARFID的不同表现(如基于感官的选择性进食,窒息或呕吐恐惧症和互动困难)。建议将药物治疗与体重恢复、营养管理和心理治疗干预相结合;对于孩子,父母应该参与进来。暴露行为疗法、系统脱敏、认知重构CBT、焦虑管理和基于家庭的干预似乎是最有用的心理治疗干预。结论:研究应该开始评估基于纵向研究的不同治疗方法的有效性,以描述ARFID的每种表现的严格循证指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信