Piriformis: Sparing approach, is it better?

Korica Stefan, Ivana Glišović-Jovanović, Uroš Moljević, Dejan Tabaković, Dejan Virijević, S. Matić, M. Kadija
{"title":"Piriformis: Sparing approach, is it better?","authors":"Korica Stefan, Ivana Glišović-Jovanović, Uroš Moljević, Dejan Tabaković, Dejan Virijević, S. Matić, M. Kadija","doi":"10.5937/pramed2104031k","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hip fractures as well as coxarthrosis are conditions that are becoming more common in everyday orthopedic practice. With the aging of the world's population, there is an increasing need for partial (HA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA). No elective procedure is as important to quality of life as total hip arthroplasty, and partial hip arthroplasty is a method of treatment in elder population who suffered fracture of the femoral neck. There are several hip approaches that can be used for arthroplasty. Hip dislocation is a serious complication after hip arthroplasty and occurs somewhat more frequently when the posterior hip approach is used. The aim of this study is to show that the piriformis sparing technique gives better results in terms of reducing the frequency of dislocations in the early postoperative period (one year). We operated od 249 patients, and after follow-up that lasted from 13 to 22 months we had four dislocations, three in patient with THA(0.021) and one after HA(0.009). Preservation of the piriformis tendon is a minor modification in the operative technique that can lead to a great benefit in the quality of treatment and a reduced risk of complications.","PeriodicalId":31688,"journal":{"name":"Praxis Medica","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Praxis Medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/pramed2104031k","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hip fractures as well as coxarthrosis are conditions that are becoming more common in everyday orthopedic practice. With the aging of the world's population, there is an increasing need for partial (HA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA). No elective procedure is as important to quality of life as total hip arthroplasty, and partial hip arthroplasty is a method of treatment in elder population who suffered fracture of the femoral neck. There are several hip approaches that can be used for arthroplasty. Hip dislocation is a serious complication after hip arthroplasty and occurs somewhat more frequently when the posterior hip approach is used. The aim of this study is to show that the piriformis sparing technique gives better results in terms of reducing the frequency of dislocations in the early postoperative period (one year). We operated od 249 patients, and after follow-up that lasted from 13 to 22 months we had four dislocations, three in patient with THA(0.021) and one after HA(0.009). Preservation of the piriformis tendon is a minor modification in the operative technique that can lead to a great benefit in the quality of treatment and a reduced risk of complications.
梨状肌:保留入路更好吗?
髋部骨折和髋关节错位是在日常骨科实践中越来越常见的情况。随着世界人口的老龄化,对部分(HA)或全髋关节置换术(THA)的需求越来越大。全髋关节置换术对生活质量的重要性无可比拟,部分髋关节置换术是老年股骨颈骨折患者的一种治疗方法。有几种髋关节入路可用于关节置换术。髋关节脱位是髋关节置换术后的一个严重并发症,当采用髋关节后路入路时发生的频率更高。本研究的目的是表明梨状肌保留技术在减少术后早期(一年)脱位频率方面具有更好的效果。我们对249例患者进行了手术,随访13至22个月,我们发现4例脱位,3例THA患者(0.021),1例HA患者(0.009)。保留梨状肌肌腱是对手术技术的一个小修改,可以在治疗质量和减少并发症的风险方面带来很大的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信