Availability of Orphan drugs: Basic legal issues of development and financing

Q4 Social Sciences
Sanja Stojković-Zlatanović
{"title":"Availability of Orphan drugs: Basic legal issues of development and financing","authors":"Sanja Stojković-Zlatanović","doi":"10.5937/PRAVZAP0-20657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper critically analyzes the basic models for the development and financing of orphan drugs, i.e. medicines for the treatment of rare diseases, starting from the principle of equality in health care proclaimed within the framework of the World Health Organization and to the protection of the rights of vulnerable categories of the population as well. A comparative and normative method has been applied. On the basis of the regulations of the European Union and the national laws of the member states, the paper emphasizes the possible solutions for the development of domestic law in the context of ensuring access to patients and exercising the right to health care. The opinion of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Nitecki v. Poland is, specifically, analyzed from the aspect of refunding the price of an orphan medicinal product and exercising the right to access to health care services for patients. The model of public-private partnership was identified as the most adequate one in the conditions of limited public resources, taking into account the interest of the state, and the need for expressing social responsibility considering the interest of the (pharmaceutical) companies. The model is based on the (bio)ethic principle of justice, conceptualized as assistance to those people who suffer from bad health condition and who are economically worse off.","PeriodicalId":53056,"journal":{"name":"Pravni Zapisi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pravni Zapisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/PRAVZAP0-20657","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper critically analyzes the basic models for the development and financing of orphan drugs, i.e. medicines for the treatment of rare diseases, starting from the principle of equality in health care proclaimed within the framework of the World Health Organization and to the protection of the rights of vulnerable categories of the population as well. A comparative and normative method has been applied. On the basis of the regulations of the European Union and the national laws of the member states, the paper emphasizes the possible solutions for the development of domestic law in the context of ensuring access to patients and exercising the right to health care. The opinion of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Nitecki v. Poland is, specifically, analyzed from the aspect of refunding the price of an orphan medicinal product and exercising the right to access to health care services for patients. The model of public-private partnership was identified as the most adequate one in the conditions of limited public resources, taking into account the interest of the state, and the need for expressing social responsibility considering the interest of the (pharmaceutical) companies. The model is based on the (bio)ethic principle of justice, conceptualized as assistance to those people who suffer from bad health condition and who are economically worse off.
孤儿药的可得性:发展和筹资的基本法律问题
本文从世界卫生组织框架内宣布的保健平等原则出发,并从保护人口中弱势群体的权利出发,批判性地分析了孤儿药(即治疗罕见疾病的药物)开发和筹资的基本模式。采用了比较和规范的方法。根据欧洲联盟的条例和成员国的国内法,该文件强调了在确保接触病人和行使保健权的背景下制定国内法的可能解决办法。具体地说,从退还孤儿医药产品的价格和为病人行使获得保健服务的权利这两个方面来分析欧洲人权法院在Nitecki诉波兰案中的意见。在公共资源有限的情况下,考虑到国家的利益,考虑到(制药)公司的利益,表达社会责任的需要,公私合作模式被认为是最合适的模式。该模式以(生物)正义伦理原则为基础,其概念是向健康状况不佳和经济状况较差的人提供援助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pravni Zapisi
Pravni Zapisi Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信