The applicability of the Internet of Things (IoT) between fundamental rights to health and to privacy

IF 0.3 Q3 LAW
Mateus de Oliveira Fornasier
{"title":"The applicability of the Internet of Things (IoT) between fundamental rights to health and to privacy","authors":"Mateus de Oliveira Fornasier","doi":"10.5380/rinc.v6i2.67592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work aims to study main insecurities and uncertainties regarding to IoT, verifying its impact to the exercise of the fundamental rights to healthcare and to privacy. Its specific objectives are: i) to present promises of IoT to healthcare and treatments; ii) to expose risks and uncertainties identified with IoT until the present moment; iii) to analyze ethical and legal principles (mainly in Brazil) concerning to IoT uses. Its main hypothesis is that healthcare can be revolutionarily improved with IoT, but despite of all of that revolution in good practices, good technologies of security, securitized by public policies and legal practices, have also to be implemented and improved by scholars, jurists and politicians. Methodology: hypothetical-deductive method of research, with a qualitative and transdisciplinar method of approach, and a bibliographical research technique. Results: IoT/IoMT presents a great potential of actualization of the fundamental right to health, but the security of the collection and storage of sensitive data should be the first concern in the development of systems involving such technologies, since there is an immense potential of disrespect to the fundamental right to the privacy of individuals from their use, not only by private third parties, but also, by the State.","PeriodicalId":43129,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Investigacoes Constitucionais-Journal of Constitutional Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5380/rinc.v6i2.67592","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Investigacoes Constitucionais-Journal of Constitutional Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5380/rinc.v6i2.67592","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

This work aims to study main insecurities and uncertainties regarding to IoT, verifying its impact to the exercise of the fundamental rights to healthcare and to privacy. Its specific objectives are: i) to present promises of IoT to healthcare and treatments; ii) to expose risks and uncertainties identified with IoT until the present moment; iii) to analyze ethical and legal principles (mainly in Brazil) concerning to IoT uses. Its main hypothesis is that healthcare can be revolutionarily improved with IoT, but despite of all of that revolution in good practices, good technologies of security, securitized by public policies and legal practices, have also to be implemented and improved by scholars, jurists and politicians. Methodology: hypothetical-deductive method of research, with a qualitative and transdisciplinar method of approach, and a bibliographical research technique. Results: IoT/IoMT presents a great potential of actualization of the fundamental right to health, but the security of the collection and storage of sensitive data should be the first concern in the development of systems involving such technologies, since there is an immense potential of disrespect to the fundamental right to the privacy of individuals from their use, not only by private third parties, but also, by the State.
物联网(IoT)在基本健康权和隐私权之间的适用性
这项工作旨在研究物联网的主要不安全和不确定性,验证其对行使医疗保健和隐私基本权利的影响。其具体目标是:i)展示物联网对医疗保健和治疗的承诺;ii)暴露物联网的风险和不确定性,直到现在;iii)分析有关物联网使用的道德和法律原则(主要在巴西)。它的主要假设是,医疗保健可以通过物联网得到革命性的改善,但尽管在良好的实践中发生了所有这些革命,但良好的安全技术,由公共政策和法律实践证券化,也必须由学者,法学家和政治家实施和改进。方法论:假设-演绎的研究方法,采用定性和跨学科的方法,以及书目研究技术。结果:物联网/物联网在实现基本健康权方面具有巨大潜力,但在开发涉及此类技术的系统时,敏感数据的收集和存储的安全性应是首要考虑的问题,因为无论是私人第三方还是国家,都有可能在使用这些数据时不尊重个人的基本隐私权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
33.30%
发文量
10
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal’s editorial line follows the main research areas developed by the research group (NINC), with focus on the critic study of Constitutional Law and legal and political institutions, and their connections with democracy, state intervention, fundamental rights and theories of justice, with particular emphasis on issues inserted into the contact points with fields of Public Law intimately connected with Constitutional Law, such as Administrative Law, Electoral Law and Theory of the State.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信