Schooling in Modernity: The Politics of Sponsored Films in Postwar Italy by Paola Bonifazio (review)

IF 0.2 3区 艺术学 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION
Brian Real
{"title":"Schooling in Modernity: The Politics of Sponsored Films in Postwar Italy by Paola Bonifazio (review)","authors":"Brian Real","doi":"10.5860/choice.186090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SCHOOLING IN MODERNITY: THE POLITICS OF SPONSORED FILMS IN POSTWAR ITALY By Paola Bonifazio Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2014, 304 ppREVIEWED BY BRIAN REALPaola Bonifazio's Schooling in Modernity: The Politics of Sponsored Films in Postwar Italy presents a previously neglected but important perspective on the history of post-World War II Italian cinema. Bonifazio analyzes a portion of the thousands of documentary and informational films made by governments, nonprofits, and corporations from 1948 through the end of the 1950s, demonstrating that various forces had an interest in guiding the structural, social, and political reconstruction of Italy. Common trends emerge throughout many of these films, but the end result was not a unified, hegemonic force that attempted to persuade Italians to adapt to a single viewpoint. Instead, Bonifazio adeptly analyzes differences of opinion between the leaders of various organizations who attempted to influence the Italian people. Additionally, the works discussed in Schooling in Modernity do not remain independent of well-known, contemporary trends in Italian cinema. Rather, the author demonstrates that many government, industrial, and educational films were in dialogue with neorealism, borrowing stylistically from these better known works while often arguing against their sociopolitical messages.The book's strength lies in Bonifazio's skillful analysis of a representative sample of these works. Each of the six chapters begins with a basic overview, before flowing into brief case studies of about a half-dozen films. Three of these chapters focus on major national issues. The first chapter discusses films that dealt with unemployment issues, while the third and fourth chapters are respectively on the national housing crisis and the economic division between the north and south. These chapters include analyses of these themes across films produced by the Italian and American governments, nonprofits, and neorealist directors. Meanwhile, the second, fifth, and sixth chapters focus specifically on corporateproduced works, educational films, and newsreels, respectively, while occasionally connecting works in these genres to those discussed in other chapters. The end result is discussions on how Italian business, education, and the media each interacted with and shaped post-Fascist society. Additionally, the main text is followed by a filmography detailing films made by the organizations discussed throughout the book, opening the door to further research by other scholars.In her introduction, Bonifazio explains the scope of her work and provides a logical reason for limiting the time frame of her study. Italian society went through a period of reinvention after the fall of Fascism, with numerous forces attempting to influence the direction of this change. The Americans had a vested interest in Italy not falling to communist influence and the Economic Cooperation Administration (ECA)-the agency set up to administer the Marshall Plan-oversaw persuasion efforts on this front. The Italian government largely cooperated with American messaging, but the Christian Democrat majority hoped to justify its continued control of the Italian government by showing that the country's progress reached beyond that spurred by outside funding and other support. Both the ECA and the Italian government depended on the growth of domestic industry to provide ongoing stability, with major businesses often conforming to governmental messages, but sometimes positing their own ideas on the proper direction for Italian society. And, as major social problems emerged or were brought to light at the end of the war, organizations such as the National Union for the Fight against Illiteracy and the Catholic Center for Cinematography moved to bring attention to such issues.Bonifazio details how all of these sponsoring organizations made use of film to convey their messages as theatres throughout the nation allowed these materials to be shown before features and outdoor exhibitors in towns without cinemas-mainly in the south of the country-gladly filled their programs with sponsored films that were provided at little or no cost. …","PeriodicalId":41748,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Film Studies-Revue Canadienne d Etudes Cinematographiques","volume":"47 1","pages":"100 - 97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Film Studies-Revue Canadienne d Etudes Cinematographiques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.186090","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

SCHOOLING IN MODERNITY: THE POLITICS OF SPONSORED FILMS IN POSTWAR ITALY By Paola Bonifazio Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2014, 304 ppREVIEWED BY BRIAN REALPaola Bonifazio's Schooling in Modernity: The Politics of Sponsored Films in Postwar Italy presents a previously neglected but important perspective on the history of post-World War II Italian cinema. Bonifazio analyzes a portion of the thousands of documentary and informational films made by governments, nonprofits, and corporations from 1948 through the end of the 1950s, demonstrating that various forces had an interest in guiding the structural, social, and political reconstruction of Italy. Common trends emerge throughout many of these films, but the end result was not a unified, hegemonic force that attempted to persuade Italians to adapt to a single viewpoint. Instead, Bonifazio adeptly analyzes differences of opinion between the leaders of various organizations who attempted to influence the Italian people. Additionally, the works discussed in Schooling in Modernity do not remain independent of well-known, contemporary trends in Italian cinema. Rather, the author demonstrates that many government, industrial, and educational films were in dialogue with neorealism, borrowing stylistically from these better known works while often arguing against their sociopolitical messages.The book's strength lies in Bonifazio's skillful analysis of a representative sample of these works. Each of the six chapters begins with a basic overview, before flowing into brief case studies of about a half-dozen films. Three of these chapters focus on major national issues. The first chapter discusses films that dealt with unemployment issues, while the third and fourth chapters are respectively on the national housing crisis and the economic division between the north and south. These chapters include analyses of these themes across films produced by the Italian and American governments, nonprofits, and neorealist directors. Meanwhile, the second, fifth, and sixth chapters focus specifically on corporateproduced works, educational films, and newsreels, respectively, while occasionally connecting works in these genres to those discussed in other chapters. The end result is discussions on how Italian business, education, and the media each interacted with and shaped post-Fascist society. Additionally, the main text is followed by a filmography detailing films made by the organizations discussed throughout the book, opening the door to further research by other scholars.In her introduction, Bonifazio explains the scope of her work and provides a logical reason for limiting the time frame of her study. Italian society went through a period of reinvention after the fall of Fascism, with numerous forces attempting to influence the direction of this change. The Americans had a vested interest in Italy not falling to communist influence and the Economic Cooperation Administration (ECA)-the agency set up to administer the Marshall Plan-oversaw persuasion efforts on this front. The Italian government largely cooperated with American messaging, but the Christian Democrat majority hoped to justify its continued control of the Italian government by showing that the country's progress reached beyond that spurred by outside funding and other support. Both the ECA and the Italian government depended on the growth of domestic industry to provide ongoing stability, with major businesses often conforming to governmental messages, but sometimes positing their own ideas on the proper direction for Italian society. And, as major social problems emerged or were brought to light at the end of the war, organizations such as the National Union for the Fight against Illiteracy and the Catholic Center for Cinematography moved to bring attention to such issues.Bonifazio details how all of these sponsoring organizations made use of film to convey their messages as theatres throughout the nation allowed these materials to be shown before features and outdoor exhibitors in towns without cinemas-mainly in the south of the country-gladly filled their programs with sponsored films that were provided at little or no cost. …
《现代性的学校教育:战后意大利赞助电影的政治》作者:保拉·博尼法齐奥
保拉·博尼法齐奥《现代性教育:战后意大利赞助电影的政治》,作者:保拉·博尼法齐奥《现代性教育:战后意大利赞助电影的政治》为二战后意大利电影史提供了一个以前被忽视但重要的视角。博尼法齐奥分析了从1948年到20世纪50年代末由政府、非营利组织和公司制作的数千部纪录片和信息电影中的一部分,表明各种力量都有兴趣指导意大利的结构、社会和政治重建。这些电影中出现了共同的趋势,但最终的结果并不是一个统一的、霸权的力量,试图说服意大利人适应单一的观点。相反,博尼法齐奥熟练地分析了试图影响意大利人民的各种组织领导人之间的意见分歧。此外,《现代性学校教育》中讨论的作品并没有独立于意大利电影中众所周知的当代趋势。相反,作者证明了许多政府、工业和教育电影都在与新现实主义对话,在风格上借鉴了这些更知名的作品,同时经常反对它们的社会政治信息。这本书的优势在于博尼法齐奥对这些作品的代表性样本进行了熟练的分析。这六章的每一章都以一个基本的概述开始,然后是对大约六部电影的简短案例研究。其中三章聚焦于重大的国家问题。第一章讨论了处理失业问题的电影,而第三章和第四章分别是关于国家住房危机和南北经济分化。这些章节包括对意大利和美国政府、非营利组织和新现实主义导演制作的电影中这些主题的分析。同时,第二章、第五章和第六章分别专门关注企业制作的作品、教育片和新闻片,同时偶尔将这些类型的作品与其他章节中讨论的作品联系起来。最终的结果是讨论意大利的商业、教育和媒体如何相互作用并塑造后法西斯社会。此外,正文之后是一个电影目录,详细介绍了本书中讨论的组织制作的电影,为其他学者的进一步研究打开了大门。在她的介绍中,Bonifazio解释了她的工作范围,并为限制她的研究时间框架提供了一个合乎逻辑的理由。法西斯主义垮台后,意大利社会经历了一段重塑时期,许多力量试图影响这一变化的方向。美国人在意大利不受共产主义影响方面有着既得利益,而经济合作署(ECA)——为执行马歇尔计划而设立的机构——负责监督这方面的说服工作。意大利政府在很大程度上与美国的信息合作,但基督教民主党多数派希望通过展示该国的进步超越了外部资金和其他支持的推动,来证明其继续控制意大利政府是合理的。ECA和意大利政府都依赖于国内工业的增长来提供持续的稳定,主要企业经常遵守政府的信息,但有时也会对意大利社会的正确方向提出自己的想法。随着主要社会问题的出现或在战争结束时暴露出来,诸如全国扫盲联盟和天主教电影摄影中心等组织开始关注这些问题。Bonifazio详细描述了所有这些赞助组织是如何利用电影来传达他们的信息的,因为全国各地的剧院都允许这些材料在没有电影院的城镇和户外放映商(主要是在该国南部)之前放映,他们很乐意用赞助的电影来填补他们的节目,这些电影提供很少或没有成本。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信