Comparing the effectiveness of the flipped classroom model and the traditional instruction model: A meta-analysis

Lidija Ralevic, Biljana Tomašević
{"title":"Comparing the effectiveness of the flipped classroom model and the traditional instruction model: A meta-analysis","authors":"Lidija Ralevic, Biljana Tomašević","doi":"10.5937/nasvas2103301r","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The flipped classroom model has been increasingly implemented in the teaching and learning process at all levels with a view to improving the teaching and learning process, particularly in the present circumstances. Despite the prevalence of the view that the implementation of this approach eliminates the key disadvantages of traditional teaching such as the passivization of students, it is advisable to verify this in practice. In order to examine the effectiveness of the implementation of the flipped classroom model, it is necessary to consider the results of students' learning and their motivation for learning relative to the traditional instruction model. This paper aims to provide insight into the current situation through the systematization of the results of some past research focusing on comparing the implementation of the flipped classroom model and the traditional instruction model in terms of their effects on internal motivation for learning and student achievement on knowledge assessment tests. The results of the conducted meta-analysis of 22 research papers suggest that the implementation of the flipped classroom contributes to the strengthening of students' internal motivation and their higher achievement.","PeriodicalId":31565,"journal":{"name":"Nastava i Vaspitanje","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nastava i Vaspitanje","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/nasvas2103301r","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The flipped classroom model has been increasingly implemented in the teaching and learning process at all levels with a view to improving the teaching and learning process, particularly in the present circumstances. Despite the prevalence of the view that the implementation of this approach eliminates the key disadvantages of traditional teaching such as the passivization of students, it is advisable to verify this in practice. In order to examine the effectiveness of the implementation of the flipped classroom model, it is necessary to consider the results of students' learning and their motivation for learning relative to the traditional instruction model. This paper aims to provide insight into the current situation through the systematization of the results of some past research focusing on comparing the implementation of the flipped classroom model and the traditional instruction model in terms of their effects on internal motivation for learning and student achievement on knowledge assessment tests. The results of the conducted meta-analysis of 22 research papers suggest that the implementation of the flipped classroom contributes to the strengthening of students' internal motivation and their higher achievement.
翻转课堂模式与传统教学模式的有效性比较:元分析
翻转课堂模式越来越多地应用于各个层次的教学过程中,以期改善教学过程,特别是在当前的情况下。尽管普遍认为这种方法的实施消除了传统教学的主要缺点,如学生的被动化,但在实践中验证这一点是可取的。为了检验翻转课堂模式实施的有效性,有必要考虑学生的学习结果和他们的学习动机相对于传统教学模式。本文旨在通过对过去一些研究结果的系统化,对翻转课堂模式的实施与传统教学模式的实施在内在学习动机和学生知识评估测试成绩方面的影响进行比较,从而洞察现状。对22篇研究论文的荟萃分析结果表明,实施翻转课堂有助于增强学生的内在动机,提高学生的学习成绩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信