Conceptualizations and approaches in defining cooperative learning

Marina Semiz
{"title":"Conceptualizations and approaches in defining cooperative learning","authors":"Marina Semiz","doi":"10.5937/NASVAS2003291S","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The uses of the concept of cooperative learning in the literature, in practice and in everyday speech suggest considerable vagueness and fluidity, particularly with regard to its content, namely, whether it refers primarily to a form of learning, a learning strategy, a teaching method, an instructional strategy, a pedagogical approach, or a system of instruction. This paper aims to present and critically analyze existing conceptualizations of cooperative learning and approaches to its definition, and thus present the position of cooperative learning in relation to relevant and related concepts within a concept network. Through analysis of concepts and definitions within the logic and methodology of social sciences (pedagogical) research, the following conclusions have been drawn: a) in the papers analyzed there are multiple meanings of cooperative learning; b) there are descriptive, prescriptive and connotative definitions of cooperative learning; c) there are psychological and pedagogical approaches to its definition, and there is an evident lack of consensus among authors on the position of this concept in the network of related concepts. The plurality of meanings in which this concept is used, and the difficulties with its definition, have been related to the different contexts of its application, the variety of authors' theoretical and methodological approaches, the complexity of the concept itself, and, in some cases, the inaccurate uses of the concept for research and practical purposes.","PeriodicalId":31565,"journal":{"name":"Nastava i Vaspitanje","volume":"69 1","pages":"291-312"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nastava i Vaspitanje","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/NASVAS2003291S","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The uses of the concept of cooperative learning in the literature, in practice and in everyday speech suggest considerable vagueness and fluidity, particularly with regard to its content, namely, whether it refers primarily to a form of learning, a learning strategy, a teaching method, an instructional strategy, a pedagogical approach, or a system of instruction. This paper aims to present and critically analyze existing conceptualizations of cooperative learning and approaches to its definition, and thus present the position of cooperative learning in relation to relevant and related concepts within a concept network. Through analysis of concepts and definitions within the logic and methodology of social sciences (pedagogical) research, the following conclusions have been drawn: a) in the papers analyzed there are multiple meanings of cooperative learning; b) there are descriptive, prescriptive and connotative definitions of cooperative learning; c) there are psychological and pedagogical approaches to its definition, and there is an evident lack of consensus among authors on the position of this concept in the network of related concepts. The plurality of meanings in which this concept is used, and the difficulties with its definition, have been related to the different contexts of its application, the variety of authors' theoretical and methodological approaches, the complexity of the concept itself, and, in some cases, the inaccurate uses of the concept for research and practical purposes.
定义合作学习的概念和方法
合作学习这一概念在文献、实践和日常用语中的运用表明了相当大的模糊性和流动性,特别是在其内容方面,即,它主要指的是一种学习形式、一种学习策略、一种教学方法、一种教学策略、一种教学方法还是一种教学系统。本文旨在提出并批判性地分析合作学习的现有概念及其定义方法,从而提出合作学习在概念网络中与相关概念的关系。通过对社会科学(教育学)研究逻辑和方法论中的概念和定义的分析,得出以下结论:a)在分析的论文中,合作学习具有多重含义;B)有描述性、规定性和内蕴性的合作学习定义;C)有心理学和教育学的方法来定义它,并且作者之间对这个概念在相关概念网络中的位置明显缺乏共识。使用这一概念的多种含义及其定义的困难,与其应用的不同背景、作者的理论和方法方法的多样性、概念本身的复杂性以及在某些情况下,为了研究和实践目的而不准确地使用这一概念有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信