Stimulating critical thinking in higher education

Dragan Partalo, Margareta Skopljak, Tatjana V. Mihajlović
{"title":"Stimulating critical thinking in higher education","authors":"Dragan Partalo, Margareta Skopljak, Tatjana V. Mihajlović","doi":"10.5937/nasvas1902231p","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Critical thinking as an ideal of higher education is particularly important in the education of prospective teachers, who are expected to be critical thinkers capable of teaching others to think critically. Critical thinking is a complex and multidimensional concept encompassing a broad range of abilities and dispositions. Different approaches to critical thinking instruction are rooted in different understandings of the concept. Authors tend to debate the relative merits of three approaches: a separate module aimed at developing general critical thinking abilities, critical thinking instruction integrated into existing courses, or a combination of the two. A Likert-type scale was used to elicit the attitudes to the promotion of critical thinking in education of a sample of 539 pedagogy and education students of the University of Banja Luka. Factor analysis identified four ways of stimulating critical thinking in higher education: meaningful learning, thought-provoking questions, exploratory teaching and learning strategies, and stimulating practice. The results indicate that most students believe critical thinking is best promoted through meaningful learning in the classroom, while exploratory teaching and learning strategies are least cited. Differences were identified between students of different study programs and different years of study. The research findings indicate that there is a need for designing new models of critical thinking stimulation while taking into account different study programs, years of study and students' needs in terms of their future careers in education.","PeriodicalId":31565,"journal":{"name":"Nastava i Vaspitanje","volume":"190 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nastava i Vaspitanje","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/nasvas1902231p","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Critical thinking as an ideal of higher education is particularly important in the education of prospective teachers, who are expected to be critical thinkers capable of teaching others to think critically. Critical thinking is a complex and multidimensional concept encompassing a broad range of abilities and dispositions. Different approaches to critical thinking instruction are rooted in different understandings of the concept. Authors tend to debate the relative merits of three approaches: a separate module aimed at developing general critical thinking abilities, critical thinking instruction integrated into existing courses, or a combination of the two. A Likert-type scale was used to elicit the attitudes to the promotion of critical thinking in education of a sample of 539 pedagogy and education students of the University of Banja Luka. Factor analysis identified four ways of stimulating critical thinking in higher education: meaningful learning, thought-provoking questions, exploratory teaching and learning strategies, and stimulating practice. The results indicate that most students believe critical thinking is best promoted through meaningful learning in the classroom, while exploratory teaching and learning strategies are least cited. Differences were identified between students of different study programs and different years of study. The research findings indicate that there is a need for designing new models of critical thinking stimulation while taking into account different study programs, years of study and students' needs in terms of their future careers in education.
在高等教育中激发批判性思维
批判性思维作为高等教育的一种理想,在未来教师的教育中尤为重要,他们被期望成为具有批判性思维能力的人,能够教别人批判性地思考。批判性思维是一个复杂而多维的概念,包含了广泛的能力和性格。批判性思维教学的不同方法源于对这一概念的不同理解。作者倾向于讨论三种方法的相对优点:一个单独的模块,旨在发展一般批判性思维能力,批判性思维教学融入现有课程,或两者的结合。本研究以巴尼亚卢卡大学539名教育学与教育系学生为样本,采用李克特式量表来了解学生对批判性思维教育的态度。因子分析确定了在高等教育中激发批判性思维的四种方式:有意义的学习,发人深省的问题,探索性教学和学习策略,以及激发实践。结果表明,大多数学生认为批判性思维最好通过课堂上有意义的学习来促进,而探索性教学和学习策略被引用最少。不同学习项目和不同学习年限的学生之间存在差异。研究结果表明,有必要设计新的批判性思维刺激模式,同时考虑到不同的学习项目、学习年限和学生未来教育事业的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信