Prediction of Accident Severity Using Artificial Neural Network: A Comparison of Analytical Capabilities between Python and R

Imran Chowdhury Dipto, A. F. M. Moshiur Rahman, Tanzila Islam, H. Rahman
{"title":"Prediction of Accident Severity Using Artificial Neural Network: A Comparison of Analytical Capabilities between Python and R","authors":"Imran Chowdhury Dipto, A. F. M. Moshiur Rahman, Tanzila Islam, H. Rahman","doi":"10.4236/jdaip.2020.83008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Large amount of data has been generated by Organizations. Different Analytical Tools are being used to handle such kind of data by Data Scientists. There are many tools available for Data processing, Visualisations, Predictive Analytics and so on. It is important to select a suitable Analytic Tool or Programming Language to carry out the tasks. In this research, two of the most commonly used Programming Languages have been compared and contrasted which are Python and R. To carry out the experiment two data sets have been collected from Kaggle and combined into a single Dataset. This study visualizes the data to generate some useful insights and prepare data for training on Artificial Neural Network by using Python and R language. The scope of this paper is to compare the analytical capabilities of Python and R. An Artificial Neural Network with Multilayer Perceptron has been implemented to predict the severity of accidents. Furthermore, the results have been used to compare and tried to point out which programming language is better for data visualization, data processing, Predictive Analytics, etc.","PeriodicalId":71434,"journal":{"name":"数据分析和信息处理(英文)","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"数据分析和信息处理(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1093","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/jdaip.2020.83008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Large amount of data has been generated by Organizations. Different Analytical Tools are being used to handle such kind of data by Data Scientists. There are many tools available for Data processing, Visualisations, Predictive Analytics and so on. It is important to select a suitable Analytic Tool or Programming Language to carry out the tasks. In this research, two of the most commonly used Programming Languages have been compared and contrasted which are Python and R. To carry out the experiment two data sets have been collected from Kaggle and combined into a single Dataset. This study visualizes the data to generate some useful insights and prepare data for training on Artificial Neural Network by using Python and R language. The scope of this paper is to compare the analytical capabilities of Python and R. An Artificial Neural Network with Multilayer Perceptron has been implemented to predict the severity of accidents. Furthermore, the results have been used to compare and tried to point out which programming language is better for data visualization, data processing, Predictive Analytics, etc.
用人工神经网络预测事故严重程度:Python和R分析能力的比较
组织产生了大量的数据。数据科学家正在使用不同的分析工具来处理这类数据。有许多工具可用于数据处理、可视化、预测分析等。选择合适的分析工具或编程语言来执行任务是很重要的。在本研究中,对Python和r这两种最常用的编程语言进行了比较和对比。为了进行实验,我们从Kaggle收集了两个数据集,并将其合并为一个数据集。本研究通过使用Python和R语言对数据进行可视化处理,生成一些有用的见解,并为人工神经网络的训练准备数据。本文的范围是比较Python和r的分析能力。实现了一个带有多层感知器的人工神经网络来预测事故的严重程度。此外,结果被用来比较,并试图指出哪种编程语言更适合数据可视化,数据处理,预测分析等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信