Study on the Safety of Different Pressure Artificial Pneumothorax on Endoscopic Radical Esophagectomy

Yafei Bao, Lei Zhang, L. Zhen, Bo Jiang, C. Yang
{"title":"Study on the Safety of Different Pressure Artificial Pneumothorax on Endoscopic Radical Esophagectomy","authors":"Yafei Bao, Lei Zhang, L. Zhen, Bo Jiang, C. Yang","doi":"10.4236/jct.2022.134017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To study the effect of different pressure artificial pneumothorax on total endoscopic radical esophagectomy during and after an operation. Methods: From 2019 to 2021, 64 patients with esophageal cancer underwent vid-eo-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in the same surgical treatment group. The pressure of CO 2 artificial pneumothorax was randomly divided into Group A (pressure 6 mmHg), Group B (pressure 8 mmHg), and Group C (pressure 10 mmHg). Heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), end-expiratory CO 2 partial pressure (PETCO 2 ), arterial blood pH and PaCO 2 , operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and anesthesia resuscitation time were recorded at different time points. Observe the changes in inflammatory indexes, coagulation function, and the incidence of complications in the three groups, and statistically analyze and compare the differences among the three groups of patients. Results: Sixty-four patients with esophageal cancer were included in this clinical study. There were no significant differences in gender, age, lung function, BMI, and coagulation function among the three groups (P > 0.05). There were significant differences in PETCO 2 , arterial pH, and PaCO 2 in T2, T3, and T4 among the three groups (P < 0.05). The arterial blood gas index at T5 in mmHg pressure and 8 L/min flow rate can satisfy the operation, and its safety and postoperative recovery are also better.","PeriodicalId":66197,"journal":{"name":"癌症治疗(英文)","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"癌症治疗(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/jct.2022.134017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To study the effect of different pressure artificial pneumothorax on total endoscopic radical esophagectomy during and after an operation. Methods: From 2019 to 2021, 64 patients with esophageal cancer underwent vid-eo-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in the same surgical treatment group. The pressure of CO 2 artificial pneumothorax was randomly divided into Group A (pressure 6 mmHg), Group B (pressure 8 mmHg), and Group C (pressure 10 mmHg). Heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), end-expiratory CO 2 partial pressure (PETCO 2 ), arterial blood pH and PaCO 2 , operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and anesthesia resuscitation time were recorded at different time points. Observe the changes in inflammatory indexes, coagulation function, and the incidence of complications in the three groups, and statistically analyze and compare the differences among the three groups of patients. Results: Sixty-four patients with esophageal cancer were included in this clinical study. There were no significant differences in gender, age, lung function, BMI, and coagulation function among the three groups (P > 0.05). There were significant differences in PETCO 2 , arterial pH, and PaCO 2 in T2, T3, and T4 among the three groups (P < 0.05). The arterial blood gas index at T5 in mmHg pressure and 8 L/min flow rate can satisfy the operation, and its safety and postoperative recovery are also better.
不同压力人工气胸在内镜下根治性食管切除术中的安全性研究
目的:探讨不同压力人工气胸在内镜下食管根治术中及术后的应用效果。方法:2019 - 2021年,同一手术治疗组64例食管癌患者行内镜辅助胸腔镜手术。co2人工气胸压力随机分为A组(压力6 mmHg)、B组(压力8 mmHg)、C组(压力10 mmHg)。记录不同时间点心率(HR)、平均动脉压(MAP)、呼气末co2分压(PETCO 2)、动脉血pH值、PaCO 2、手术时间、术中出血量、麻醉复苏时间。观察三组患者炎症指标、凝血功能、并发症发生率的变化,并统计分析比较三组患者的差异。结果:本研究纳入64例食管癌患者。三组患者性别、年龄、肺功能、BMI、凝血功能差异均无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。三组患者T2、T3、T4期PETCO 2、动脉pH、PaCO 2比较,差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。T5 mmHg压下的动脉血气指数和8 L/min流速均能满足手术要求,其安全性和术后恢复也较好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1185
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信