Can Tense Be Subject to Grammatical Illusion? Part 1: A Design of an ERP Study on the Processing of Tense and Aspect Mismatches in Compound Future Constructions in Polish

Q2 Arts and Humanities
J. Błaszczak, Juliane Domke
{"title":"Can Tense Be Subject to Grammatical Illusion? Part 1: A Design of an ERP Study on the Processing of Tense and Aspect Mismatches in Compound Future Constructions in Polish","authors":"J. Błaszczak, Juliane Domke","doi":"10.4467/23005920spl.19.018.11336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This two-part paper is concerned with the processing of two types of compound future in Polish, with infinitival and participial complements. In the first part we present a design and predictions of an ERP study whose goal was to monitor the EEG correlates of two types of temporal mismatches: i) tense mismatches between the future auxiliary and the past tense modifier wczoraj (‘yesterday’) relative to the jutro (‘tomorrow’) baseline and ii) aspect mismatches between the future auxiliary and the perfective aspect of the lexical complement relative to the imperfective baseline. In addition, we wanted to assess whether matching tense specifications in different words of a sentence can cause grammatical illusions. To this aim, we tested whether the presence of the adverb wczoraj (‘yesterday’) (specified for [past]) could give rise to an illusion of grammaticality for perfectives as l -participles (allegedly [past] marked), but not as infinitives (not having any [past] speci-fication). The study and its results as well as a general discussion of the findings will be presented in Part II of the paper.","PeriodicalId":37336,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Polish Linguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Polish Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4467/23005920spl.19.018.11336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This two-part paper is concerned with the processing of two types of compound future in Polish, with infinitival and participial complements. In the first part we present a design and predictions of an ERP study whose goal was to monitor the EEG correlates of two types of temporal mismatches: i) tense mismatches between the future auxiliary and the past tense modifier wczoraj (‘yesterday’) relative to the jutro (‘tomorrow’) baseline and ii) aspect mismatches between the future auxiliary and the perfective aspect of the lexical complement relative to the imperfective baseline. In addition, we wanted to assess whether matching tense specifications in different words of a sentence can cause grammatical illusions. To this aim, we tested whether the presence of the adverb wczoraj (‘yesterday’) (specified for [past]) could give rise to an illusion of grammaticality for perfectives as l -participles (allegedly [past] marked), but not as infinitives (not having any [past] speci-fication). The study and its results as well as a general discussion of the findings will be presented in Part II of the paper.
时态会受到语法错觉的影响吗?第一部分:波兰语复合将来式时位不匹配处理的ERP研究设计
这篇论文分为两部分,研究了波兰语中两种类型的复合将来时的处理,包括不定式和分词补语。在第一部分中,我们提出了一项ERP研究的设计和预测,其目的是监测两种类型的时间不匹配的脑电图相关性:1)将来助词和过去时修饰语wczoraj(“昨天”)相对于jutro(“明天”)基线的时态不匹配;2)将来助词和词汇补语的完成体相对于不完成基线的时态不匹配。此外,我们想评估在一个句子的不同单词中匹配时态规范是否会导致语法错觉。为此,我们测试了副词wczoraj(“昨天”)(指定为[过去])的存在是否会导致完成时作为l分词(据称标记为[过去])的语法错误,而不是作为不定式(没有任何[过去]说明)。该研究及其结果以及对研究结果的一般性讨论将在论文的第二部分中提出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Studies in Polish Linguistics
Studies in Polish Linguistics Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信