Gleason Score Correlation Between Prostate Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Specimens

IF 0.1 Q4 ONCOLOGY
E. Öztürk, T. N. Yıkılmaz
{"title":"Gleason Score Correlation Between Prostate Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Specimens","authors":"E. Öztürk, T. N. Yıkılmaz","doi":"10.4274/UOB.921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy in men and the second cause of cancer-related mortality. Prostate biopsy and the Gleason score guide treatment decisions in prostate cancer. Several studies have investigated the correlation between biopsy scores and radical prostatectomy specimen scores. We also evaluated the correlation of Gleason scores of these specimens in our patient series. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data of 468 men who were diagnosed with prostate cancer and underwent radical prostatectomy between 2008 and 2017. Patients’ age, prostate-specific antigen levels at diagnosis, and prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen Gleason scores were recorded. Upgrading and downgrading were defined as increase or decrease of Gleason score of radical prostate specimen compared to Gleason score of prostate biopsy. Results: A total of 442 men diagnosed with prostate cancer were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 62.62±6.26 years (44-84 years) and mean prostate specific antigen level was 9.01±6.84 ng/mL (1.09-49 ng/mL). Prostate biopsy Gleason score was <7 in 335 (75.8%) men, 7 in 80 (18.1%) men, and >7 in 27 (6.1%) men. Radical prostatectomy specimen Gleason score was <7 in 267 (60.4%) men, 7 in 113 (25.5%) men and >7 in 62 (14%) men. Gleason correlation was highest in the 240 patients (71.6%) with score <7 and was lowest in the 31 (38.75%) patients with score =7. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the discordance rate between Gleason scores of prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens was 35.7%.","PeriodicalId":40816,"journal":{"name":"Uroonkoloji Bulteni-Bulletin of Urooncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Uroonkoloji Bulteni-Bulletin of Urooncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/UOB.921","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Objective: Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy in men and the second cause of cancer-related mortality. Prostate biopsy and the Gleason score guide treatment decisions in prostate cancer. Several studies have investigated the correlation between biopsy scores and radical prostatectomy specimen scores. We also evaluated the correlation of Gleason scores of these specimens in our patient series. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data of 468 men who were diagnosed with prostate cancer and underwent radical prostatectomy between 2008 and 2017. Patients’ age, prostate-specific antigen levels at diagnosis, and prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen Gleason scores were recorded. Upgrading and downgrading were defined as increase or decrease of Gleason score of radical prostate specimen compared to Gleason score of prostate biopsy. Results: A total of 442 men diagnosed with prostate cancer were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 62.62±6.26 years (44-84 years) and mean prostate specific antigen level was 9.01±6.84 ng/mL (1.09-49 ng/mL). Prostate biopsy Gleason score was <7 in 335 (75.8%) men, 7 in 80 (18.1%) men, and >7 in 27 (6.1%) men. Radical prostatectomy specimen Gleason score was <7 in 267 (60.4%) men, 7 in 113 (25.5%) men and >7 in 62 (14%) men. Gleason correlation was highest in the 240 patients (71.6%) with score <7 and was lowest in the 31 (38.75%) patients with score =7. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the discordance rate between Gleason scores of prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens was 35.7%.
前列腺活检与根治性前列腺切除术标本的Gleason评分相关性分析
目的:前列腺癌是男性最常见的恶性肿瘤,也是癌症相关死亡的第二大原因。前列腺活检和Gleason评分指导前列腺癌的治疗决策。一些研究调查了活检评分和根治性前列腺切除术标本评分之间的相关性。我们还在我们的患者系列中评估了这些标本的Gleason评分的相关性。材料和方法:我们回顾性分析了2008年至2017年间468名被诊断患有前列腺癌并接受根治性前列腺切除术的男性的数据。记录患者年龄、诊断时前列腺特异性抗原水平、前列腺活检和根治性前列腺切除术标本Gleason评分。升级和降级的定义是根治性前列腺标本的Gleason评分较前列腺活检的Gleason评分升高或降低。结果:共有442名诊断为前列腺癌的男性被纳入研究。患者平均年龄为62.62±6.26岁(44 ~ 84岁),平均前列腺特异性抗原水平为9.01±6.84 ng/mL (1.09 ~ 49 ng/mL)。前列腺活检Gleason评分为7 / 27(6.1%)。62例(14%)男性根治性前列腺切除术标本Gleason评分为7分。Gleason相关性在评分<7的240例患者中最高(71.6%),在评分=7的31例患者中最低(38.75%)。结论:本研究表明前列腺活检与根治性前列腺切除术标本Gleason评分的不一致性为35.7%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
50.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信